Notes on Two Types of Fragments
1
조회
0
다운로드
48
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean has two types of fragments: Case-marked and case-less fragments. We suggest that they must be treated differently: Case-marked fragments are derived from TP ellipsis, while caseless fragments are just CPs directly dominating non-sentential NPs. Patterns of fragments containing negative polarity items or temporal adverbs support our claim that caseless fragments do not correlate with any sentential source. One of the issues regarding the architectures of grammar is whether the pragmatic/semantic factors come into play independently from syntax. Culicover & Jackendoff (2005) suggest that the grammar consists of parallel generative components, at least independent components for phonology, syntax, and semantics, each of which creates its own type of combinatorial complexity (this architecture of grammar is often called parallelism). This paper aims to defend the syntactocentrism advocated in Minimalism led by Chomsky (1995) that the grammar permits sound structure and semantic/pragmatic structure to interact only by way of syntax proper by exploring two kinds of fragments in Korean.
Abstract
Korean has two types of fragments: Case-marked and case-less fragments. We suggest that they must be treated differently: Case-marked fragments are derived from TP ellipsis, while caseless fragments are just CPs directly dominating non-sentential NPs. Patterns of fragments containing negative polarity items or temporal adverbs support our claim that caseless fragments do not correlate with any sentential source. One of the issues regarding the architectures of grammar is whether the pragmatic/semantic factors come into play independently from syntax. Culicover & Jackendoff (2005) suggest that the grammar consists of parallel generative components, at least independent components for phonology, syntax, and semantics, each of which creates its own type of combinatorial complexity (this architecture of grammar is often called parallelism). This paper aims to defend the syntactocentrism advocated in Minimalism led by Chomsky (1995) that the grammar permits sound structure and semantic/pragmatic structure to interact only by way of syntax proper by exploring two kinds of fragments in Korean.
참고문헌 (36)
- Ahn, H.-D, "Preliminary remarks on Korean NP, IN Papers from the Sixth International Conference on Korean Linguistics", pp.1~15 (1988), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Ahn,H.-D, "Two faces of fragments", Paper presented at the Fall 2010 Conference of the Korean Generative Grammar Circle (2010), Korea University (Sejong Campus)
- Ahn, H.-D, "On form-function mismatch puzzles in fragments: An ellipsis analysis", Discourse and Cognition, 13, pp.91~110 (2006)
- 안희돈, "Fragments, Clause Type, and Clausal Architecture", 생성문법연구, 21(1), pp.201~214 (2011), 한국생성문법학회
- Barton, E, "Nonsentential constituents" (1990), John Benjamins
- Barton, E, "Nonsentential constituents and theories of phrase structure ,in: Views on Phrase Structure", pp.193~214 (1991), Kluwer
- Barton,E, "The grammar of telegraphic structures: sentential and nonsentential derivation", Journal of English Linguistics, 26, pp.37~67 (1998)
- Barton, E, "Nonsententials in minimalism ,in: Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech", pp.71~93 (2005), New York
- Choi, Y, "Fragments with or without articulated constituents at LF", NELS, 29, pp.177~188 (2009)
- Chomsky,N, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
- Culicover, P.W, "Simpler Syntax" (2005), Oxford University
- Ginzburg, J, "Interrogative Investigations" (2000), CSLI Publications
- Fiengo, R, "Indices and Identity" (1994), MIT Press
- Fortin,C, "Some (not all) nonsententials are only a phrase", Lingua, 117, pp.67~94 (2007)
- Hankamer, J, "Deletion in coordinate structures", 박사, pp.1979
- Jackendoff,R., "Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Kim,K.-S, "A paradox in Korean NPI licensing", Studies in Generative Grammar, 9, pp.403~428 (1999)
- Lappin,S, "The interpretation of ellipsis ,in: Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory", pp.145~75 (1996), Blackwell
- López,L, "A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure" (2009), Oxford University Press
- Ludlow,P, "A note on alleged cases of non-sentential assertion ,in: Ellipsis and Non-sentential Speech", pp.95~108 (2005), Springer
- Merchant,J, "Fragments and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27, pp.661~738 (2004)
- Morgan,J, "Sentence fragments and the notion ‘sentence’ ,in: Issues in Linguistics", pp.719~51 (1973), University of Illinois Press
- Morgan,J, "Sentence fragments revisited ,in:CLS 25: Parasession on Language and Context" (1989), Chicago Linguistic Society
- Sag, I, "Deletion and logical form", 박사, pp.1979
- Sells,P, "Negative polarity licensing and interpretation", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, IX, pp.3~22 (2001)
- Sells,P, "Interactions of negative polarity items in Korean", Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, XI, pp.724~737 (2006)
- Stainton,R, "Non-sentential assertions and semantic ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.281~296 (1995)
- Stainton,R, "Utterance meaning and syntactic ellipsis", Pragmatics and Cognition, 5, pp.51~8 (1997)
- Stainton,R, "Quantifier phrases, meaningfulness ‘n isolation’ and ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 18, pp.281~296 (1998)
- Stainton,R, "In defense of non-sentential assertion ,in: Semantics vs. Pragmatics", pp.383~457 (2005), Oxford University
- Stainton,R, "Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis, and the Philosophy of Language" (2006), Oxford University Press
- Stanley,J, "Context and logical form", Linguistics and Philosophy, 23, pp.391~34 (2000)
- Tancredi,C, "Deletion, deaccenting and presupposition", 박사, pp.1992
- Tateishi,K, "SPEC in Japanese and universality of X'-Theory", Syntax Generals Paper (1988), University of Massachusetts
- Wasow,T, "Anaphoric relations in English", 박사, pp.1972
- Williams,E, "Discourse and logical form", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.101~39 (1977)