본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Merge of Topic and Pronominal Apposition Construction in AAVE

임채경
한국현대언어학회 (The Modern Linguistic Society Of Korea)|2011.04|언어연구 (Linguistic Research)|제28권 제1호|pp. 37-51|DOI 10.17250/khisli.28.1.201104.003

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

localitypronominal apposition constructionSpecifier Incorporation PrincipleMultiple Sphere Hypothesis3 dimension Merge
주제분류언어학

초록

This paper is an attempt to explain the pronominal apposition construction in AAVE based on the Multiple Sphere Hypothesis suggested in Im (2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009) as well as the Merge principle suggested in van Gelderen (2006). We argue that the noun phrase followed by the pronominal subject is not moved from inside the sentence but base-generated as a topic by 3D-Merge in Ω-sphere and the Specifier Incorporation Principle. The simultaneous Merge in three spheres guarantees the licensing of the topic phrase and the pronominal subject without causing the locality problem.

Abstract

This paper is an attempt to explain the pronominal apposition construction in AAVE based on the Multiple Sphere Hypothesis suggested in Im (2004, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009) as well as the Merge principle suggested in van Gelderen (2006). We argue that the noun phrase followed by the pronominal subject is not moved from inside the sentence but base-generated as a topic by 3D-Merge in Ω-sphere and the Specifier Incorporation Principle. The simultaneous Merge in three spheres guarantees the licensing of the topic phrase and the pronominal subject without causing the locality problem.

참고문헌 (44)

  1. Barbosa, P, "Clitics: a Window into the Null Subject Property ,in: Portuguese Syntax-New Comparative Studies", pp.31~93 (2000), Oxford University
  2. Belletti, A, "Verb Positions: Evidence from Italian ,in: Verb Movement", pp.19~40 (1994), Cambridge
  3. Belletti, A, "The Order of Verbal Complements: A Comparative Study", NLLT, 13, pp.489~526 (1995)
  4. Boeckx,C, "Bare Syntax" (2008), Oxford University
  5. Burzio,L, "Italian Syntax" (1986), Reidel
  6. Calabrese,A, "Some Remarks on Focus and Logical Structures in Italian", Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics (1991), Harvard U
  7. Chomsky,N, "On Wh-Movement ,in: Formal Syntax" (1977), Academic Press
  8. Chomsky,N, "Some concepts and consequences of the theory of government and binding" (1982), MIT Press
  9. Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  10. Chomsky,N, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
  11. Chomsky,N, "Minimalist inquiries: The framework", MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15 (1998), Mass
  12. Chomsky, N, "Derivation by phase", MITWPL, 18 (1999)
  13. Chomsky,N, "Beyond explanatory adequacy", MITOPL, 20 (2001)
  14. Clark,R., "The selection of syntactic knowledge", Language Acquisition, 2, pp.83~149 (1992)
  15. Costa,J, "Positions for subjects in European Portuguese", Proceedings of WCCFL, XV (1996), CLSI Publications
  16. Dryer, M. S, "World Atlas of Language Structures" (2005), Oxford University
  17. van Gelderen,E, "Grammaticalization as Economy" (2004), John Benjamins
  18. van Gelderen,E, "Economy of Merge and Grammaticalization: Two Steps in the Evolution of Language" (2006)
  19. van Gelderen, E, "Where did the late merge go? Grammaticalization as feature economy", Studia Linguistica, 62(3), pp.287~300 (2008)
  20. van Gelderen, E, "Feature Economy in the Linguistic Cycle, IN Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory", pp.93~109 (2008)
  21. Givȯn,T, "From Discourse to Syntax: Grammar as a Processing Strategy", Syntax and Semantics 12. Discourse and Syntax, ~ (1979)
  22. Grimshaw, J, "J. Beckman", Papers in Optimality Theory, UMOP 18, ~ (1995)
  23. Grohmann, K. K, "Prolific Peripheries" (2003), John Benjamins
  24. Grohmann, K. K, "Natural Relations" (2003), University of Cyprus
  25. Grolla,E, "Resumptive Pronouns as Last Resort: Implications for Language Acquisition", Proceedings of the 28th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium (2004), University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics
  26. Haegeman,L, "Introduction to Government and Binding Theory" (1994), Blackwell
  27. Im,C.G, "Derivational economy and Multiple Spheres Hypothesis", Journal of Linguistic Science, 30, pp.277~298 (2004)
  28. 임채경, "Interpretation vs. Generation of ＂-self＂", 현대문법연구, 44(44), pp.91~119 (2006), 현대문법학회
  29. Chegyong Im, "Move is Occur; the First Step to Eliminate Movement", 언어학, 15(4), pp.197~221 (2007), 대한언어학회
  30. 임채경, "분리주어의 주어상승분석에 대한 대안", 현대문법연구, (53), pp.39~55 (2008), 현대문법학회
  31. 임채경, "How to Numerate and What to Compute: An Alternative Approach to Solve the Late Merge of Adjunct", 언어학, 17(3), pp.1~24 (2009), 대한언어학회
  32. Im. C. G, "Multiple Transfer and Honorification in Korean", Proceedings, 2010. The Society of Modern Grammar Spring Conference, pp.45~58 (2010)
  33. 이필환, "Two Economy Principles for Merge and Grammaticalization - with Special Reference to the Categorial Changes of Like", 영미어문학, (97), pp.235~253 (2010), 한국영미어문학회
  34. Li,C.N, "Subject and Topic: A New Typology of Language ,in: Subject and Topic" (1976), Academic Press
  35. Pinto,M, "Subjects in Italian: Distribution and Interpretation" (1994), John Benjamins
  36. Reinhart,T, "Interface Strategies: Reference-Set Computation", LI Monographs, 45 (2006)
  37. Rizzi, L, "Issues in Italian Syntax", ~ (1982)
  38. Rizzi, L, "The fine structure of the left periphery ,in: Elements of Grammar", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
  39. Rosen,S.T, "Structured Events, Structured Discourse", The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, ~ (2007)
  40. Ross,J, "Constraints on Variables in Syntax", 박사, pp.1967
  41. Rydėn,M, "The Emergence of who as relativizer", Studia Linguistica, 37, pp.126~134 (1983)
  42. Samek-Lodovici,V, "Structural Focusing and Subject Inversion in Italian", Paper presented at the Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages XXIV (1994)
  43. Sells,P, "The Syntax and Semantics of Resumptive Pronouns", 박사, pp.1984
  44. Uriagereka,J, "Multiple Spell-Out ,in: Working Minimalism", pp.251~82 (1999), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천

Double Subject Constructions in Korean: A Purely Derivational 3D Merge Approach임채경한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2012 · 제29권 제1호Topic Constructions in Korean이혜란사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2008 · 제16권 제4호Internally Headed Relative Clause in Korean: Structure and Interpretation최영식사단법인 한국언어학회 · 언어학2014 · 제22권 제3호Subject Positions in Locative Inversion Constructions in English and Korean이성용한국언어과학회 · 언어과학2018 · 제25권 제4호A-movement: Its successive cyclicity revisitedManabu Mizuguchi한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2020 · 제37권 제3호Predicate topicalization in Korean: A construction-based HPSG Approach김종복한국언어학회 · 언어2019 · 제44권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

Case in 'ECM' Resultatives박명관pp. 1-18Notes on Two Types of Fragments안희돈, 조성은pp. 19-35Omissibility of a Preposition in the Omission of a Prepositional Object in English Prepositional Phrases정인식pp. 53-73Typological Adaptation of Japanese Stops in Korean이주희pp. 75-93Ordering Paradoxes in English Suffixation: An Account Based on Relative Frequency홍성훈, 이주은pp. 95-115
원문 보기