본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

독일과 프랑스의 친권제한제도에 관한 고찰 - 부모에 의한 아동학대사례를 중심으로 -

Study on the limit of parental right in Germany and France - Focusing on the child abuse by parents -

0

조회

0

다운로드

21

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Our civil law has some limit in protecting abused child since they regulate only the termination of parental right in limiting the right of parents who abused the child. In addition, the current actions for abused child are not enough for protection of parents or children because they are usually taken by only administration without the intervention of family law. Therefore, we might be in the desperate situation to consider the introduction of the limit of parental right. To solve this matter, I'd like to present a couple of effective ways after getting tips from the systems of Germany and France that have strong legal systems regarding the limit of parental right, that is, the cooperative systems and divided roles of court and administration from Germany, and concrete and systematic measures regarding the limit of parental right from France. First, it is recommended that the termination of parental right should be set aside as the last steps by the court considering that the significance of the aftermath. Instead, various steps in limiting parental right which are appropriate for each concrete situation should be taken before the termination of parental right. Therefore, we need to regulate the possibility and variety in limiting parental right to utilize as the previous step in terminating parental right under the civil law. In addition, it is recommended that the protective actions the court needs to take to fight against child abuse and the concrete regulation of judicial judgement should be regulated in Child Welfare Act. Second, in case of limiting the right of the parents who abused the child, family court should take various protective actions considering comprehensive reasons, degree, continuance, repetition of child abuse, abused child's opinion and the possibility of continued danger. Third, the administration that takes protective measures must play an important role in assisting family court through the protection of abused child and the assistance for whole family. And it is significant that proper actions should be taken in the view point of guardianship and welfare. To make these actions more effective, the court should keep strong connections and protective relations with many organizations which are related with child abuse as the agency of guardianship and welfare.

Abstract

Our civil law has some limit in protecting abused child since they regulate only the termination of parental right in limiting the right of parents who abused the child. In addition, the current actions for abused child are not enough for protection of parents or children because they are usually taken by only administration without the intervention of family law. Therefore, we might be in the desperate situation to consider the introduction of the limit of parental right. To solve this matter, I'd like to present a couple of effective ways after getting tips from the systems of Germany and France that have strong legal systems regarding the limit of parental right, that is, the cooperative systems and divided roles of court and administration from Germany, and concrete and systematic measures regarding the limit of parental right from France. First, it is recommended that the termination of parental right should be set aside as the last steps by the court considering that the significance of the aftermath. Instead, various steps in limiting parental right which are appropriate for each concrete situation should be taken before the termination of parental right. Therefore, we need to regulate the possibility and variety in limiting parental right to utilize as the previous step in terminating parental right under the civil law. In addition, it is recommended that the protective actions the court needs to take to fight against child abuse and the concrete regulation of judicial judgement should be regulated in Child Welfare Act. Second, in case of limiting the right of the parents who abused the child, family court should take various protective actions considering comprehensive reasons, degree, continuance, repetition of child abuse, abused child's opinion and the possibility of continued danger. Third, the administration that takes protective measures must play an important role in assisting family court through the protection of abused child and the assistance for whole family. And it is significant that proper actions should be taken in the view point of guardianship and welfare. To make these actions more effective, the court should keep strong connections and protective relations with many organizations which are related with child abuse as the agency of guardianship and welfare.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 김유미, "아동의 권리실현을 위한 관련법에 관한 고찰", 가족법연구, (10) (1996), 한국 가족법학회
  2. 김유미, "자녀복리의 관점에서 본 한국 친권법: 특히 신상에 관한 효력의 검토를 중심으로", 박사, pp.1995
  3. 김주수, (2008), 법문사
  4. 명순구, "프랑스민법전" (2004), 법문사
  5. 박주영, "자녀의 이익을 위한 가사사건 절차상 대리인제도 -영국과 독일의 제도를 중심으로-", 민사법학, (46), pp.477~518 (2009), 한국민사법학회
  6. 박주영, "피학대아동에 대한 법적 보호", 박사, pp.2008
  7. 제정을 위한 전문가토론회(자료), "2010"
  8. 이호중, "아동학대에 대한 대응시스템의 문제점과 전문법원제도의 도입방안-피학대아동에 대한 보호서비스와 친권제한 등의 유기적 연계를 중심으로-", 피해자학연구, 15(2), pp.207~238 (2007), 한국피해자학회
  9. 이화숙, "현행 친권법상 자녀의 이익과 부모의 책임", 정신건강연구, 15 (1996), 한양대학교 정신건강연구소
  10. 제정을 위한 전문가토론회자료집, "2010"
  11. 최진섭, "미국의 친권상실제도. in: 현대민사법연구: 일헌최병욱교수정년기념논문집" (2002), 법문사
  12. 한봉희, "친권법의 새로운 전개", 가족법연구, (11) (1997), 한국가족법학회
  13. 전국아동학대현황보고서, "보건복지부", ~ (2010)
  14. Bénabent, Alain, "Droit Civil La Famille, 11e éd" (2003), Litec
  15. Cornu, Gérard, "Droit Civil la Famille, 9e éd" (2006), Montchrestien
  16. Häußermann, Röse, "Das neue Familienverfahrensrecht. in: Reform des familiengerichtlichenVerfahrens" (2009), Universitätsverlag Göttingen
  17. MünchKomm, "1666 BGB, Familienrecht Ⅱ, 5. Aufl", ~ (2008)
  18. MünchKomm, "42 SGB Ⅷ, Bd. 8", ~ (2008)
  19. Palandt, "1666 BGB, 68. Aufl", ~ (2009)
  20. Schwab, Dieter, "Familienrecht, 17. Aufl", ~ (2009)
  21. Staudinger, "1666 BGB", ~ (2009)
  22. Wiesner Kommentar, "SGB Ⅷ: Kinder-und Jugendhilfe, 3. Aufl", ~ (2006)
  23. "KG vom 25. 1. 1985, FamRZ", ~ (1985)
  24. "OLG Hamm vom 8. 8. 2001, FamRZ", ~ (2002)
  25. "BT-Drucks. 16", 6308
  26. "BT-Drucks. 16", 6815
  27. "BT-Drucks. 16", 9733
  28. 兒童虐待防止のための親權制度硏究會, "報告書", ~ (2010)
  29. 田中通裕, "フランスの親權法", 民商法雜誌, 136(4.5) (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)