노부모부양에 대한 소고
A Study of Support of Aged Parents
1
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Korean civil law has the separated regulation of support; matrimonial support, support for underage children, and support for relatives. These regulations of korean civil law are grouped by kinship, not by the type and substance of the support. So the detailed contents needs to be defined by the regulation and the interpretation of the law. The common view of regulation of support tells ‘two-typology’; primary duty of support (=Unterhaltspflicht), and supplementary duty of support(=Unterstützung- spflicht). The precedent also follows this two typology. This typology invented around early 1900s, to meet the change of the previous family into nuclear family, and the basic structure is from swiss civil law(ZGB). Even though this theory succeeded to make us understand the strategy of support, it also has problem that it considers the duty of support for aged parents as an assistant (secondary) support. This problem is caused by the deferences between the family system and the sense of family of Japan, Swiss and Korea. Korean people has big burden to nurse, nurture and attend to their children until the children grow up, and then the children support them. We need to consider this inherently problems of the theory, and adjust to our situation. In conclusion, the support of children to the parents in Korea, is the primary duty of support, and is different from the other duty of support to other relatives. In addition, contents and nature of private support, including support of aged pararents, should be considered within situation of public assistance.
Abstract
Korean civil law has the separated regulation of support; matrimonial support, support for underage children, and support for relatives. These regulations of korean civil law are grouped by kinship, not by the type and substance of the support. So the detailed contents needs to be defined by the regulation and the interpretation of the law. The common view of regulation of support tells ‘two-typology’; primary duty of support (=Unterhaltspflicht), and supplementary duty of support(=Unterstützung- spflicht). The precedent also follows this two typology. This typology invented around early 1900s, to meet the change of the previous family into nuclear family, and the basic structure is from swiss civil law(ZGB). Even though this theory succeeded to make us understand the strategy of support, it also has problem that it considers the duty of support for aged parents as an assistant (secondary) support. This problem is caused by the deferences between the family system and the sense of family of Japan, Swiss and Korea. Korean people has big burden to nurse, nurture and attend to their children until the children grow up, and then the children support them. We need to consider this inherently problems of the theory, and adjust to our situation. In conclusion, the support of children to the parents in Korea, is the primary duty of support, and is different from the other duty of support to other relatives. In addition, contents and nature of private support, including support of aged pararents, should be considered within situation of public assistance.
참고문헌 (43)
- 김상용, "부양법 및 상속법에 있어서 가족간의 연대(유대)", 중앙법학, 11(2), pp.615~636 (2009), 중앙법학회
- 권재문, "민법상 부양의무의 한계", 석사, pp.2001
- 김용욱, "노부모의 부양관계 (Ⅰ)", 사법행정, 18(1), pp.60~ (1997), 한국사법행정학회
- 김용욱, "노친부양에 관한 연구. in: 정범석박사화갑기념논문집", pp.105~ (1977), 법전출판사
- 김용한, "친족상속법" (2004), 박영사
- 김윤정, "한국 대학생과 일본 대학생의 부모 부양의식 비교", 日本文化學報, (39), pp.211~229 (2008), 한국일본문화학회
- 김윤정, "한국 대학생과 일본 대학생의 부모 부양의식 비교", 日本文化學報, (39), pp.211~229 (2008), 한국일본문화학회
- 김은아, "부모부양의 상속법적 접근", 법학연구, (23), pp.113~132 (2006), 한국법학회
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2009), 법문사
- 박도희, "부모부양에 대한 제고 - 민법상 부모부양 의무규정의 해석, 적용에 관하여 -", 한양법학, (22), pp.242~264 (2008), 한양법학회
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2009), 박영사
- 박병호, "아버지는 법률이 만드는가?. in: 변화하는 사회, 변화하는 아버지", 한국가정법률상담소 심포지움자료집, pp.5~ (1997)
- 배경숙, "친족상속법강의" (2004), 제일법규
- 백승흠, "노인부양과 상속법리의 연결", 비교법연구, 4(1), pp.137~ (2003), 동국대학교 비교법문화연구소
- 송다영, "부양의식을 통해 본 노인부양지원정책 방향성 : 기혼여성의 부양경험을 중심으로", 사회복지정책, (19), pp.207~234 (2004), 한국사회복지정책학회
- 신영호, "21세기를 향한 상속법상의 과제 - 상속과 부양과의 관련을 통하여 본 상속법의 미래상 -", 한일법학연구, 17, pp.157~ (1988), 한일법학회
- 신영호, "피상속인에 대한 상속인의 부양과 상속과의 관계", 가정법원사건의 제문제, 102, pp.175~ (2003), 재판자료
- 신영호, "가족법강의" (2010), 세창출판사
- 안봉근, "국민기초생활보장법상 보충성원리에 관한 연구", 한국사회복지학, 61(3), pp.5~28 (2009), 한국사회복지학회
- 이경희, "가족법" (2009), 법원사
- 이병운, "민법상 부양의무와 사회보장법상 가족책임의 사회적 평가와 조정", 사회보장연구, 20(2), pp.179~207 (2004), 한국사회보장학회
- 이승우, "노친부양소고", 가족법연구, (14), pp.185~ (2000), 한국가족법학회
- 이승우, "특별한 부양과 기여분", 성균관법학, 13(2), pp.177~ (2010), 성균관대학교 비교법연구소
- 이희배, "노친부양의 법리 - 자․공동의 제일차적 책임으로서의 노친부양 -", 외법논집, 2, pp.207~ (1995), 한국외국어대학교 법학연구소
- 이희배, "노친부양의 법리", 가족법연구, (9), pp.299~ (1995), 한국가족법학회
- 이희배, "민법상 부양법리에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, (2), pp.299~ (1988), 한국가족법학회
- 정귀호, "부양에 관한 연구 - 한국부양법리의 내포와 외연 -", 박사, pp.1987
- 조승현, "친족․상속법" (2009), 신조사
- 한웅길, "한국에서의 노부모부양과 부양료구상 - 사법적 보호의 관점에서", 저스티스, (46), pp.50~ (1997), 한국법학원
- 岡村勉, "現代家族法學" (1999), 法律文化史
- 吉田恒雄, "親族法․相續法" (2006), 尙學社
- 渡辺信英, "福祉のための家族法 (親族編)" (2002), 南窓社
- 召正也, "過去の扶養料請求, 判例演習 (親族․相續法)〔18〕" (1964), 有斐閣
- 於保不二雄, "(新版) 注釋民法 25 , 親族(5), 親權·後見·保佐及び補助·扶養 §§ 818-888", ~ (1994)
- 鈴木祿彌, "生活保持義務と生活扶助義務との問には、いかなる差異があるか", 民法の基礎知識, (1) (1964), 有斐閣
- 佐藤隆夫, "生活保持と生活扶助, 現代家族法大系 3 - 親子․親權․厚絹․扶養 (中川善之助先生追悼)" (1979), 有斐閣
- 中川善之助, "(新訂) 親族法" (1965), 青林書院新社
- 中川淳, "現代家族の法學" (2000), 日本加除出版
- 浦本寬雄, "家族法 〔第2版〕" (2003), 法律文化社
- Amstutz, Marc, "Handkommentar zum Schweizer Privatrecht" (2007), Schlthess Verlag
- Ehinger, Uta, "Elternunterhalt - Gesetzliche Vorraussetzungen und Beschränkungen der Inanspruchnahme durch Rechtsprechung und Gesetzgebung", NJW, pp.2465~ (2008)
- Gerhardt, Peter, "Handbuch des Fachanwalts Fallienrecht" (2008), Luchterhand
- Kostkiewicz, Jolanta Kren, "ZGB - Hand- kommentar zum Schweizerischen Zivilgesetzbuch" (2006), orell füssli