법원의 개입을 통한 강제적 친자분리제도에 관한 고찰 ―일본과 영국을 중심으로―
A Study on the Compulsory Parent-Child Separation System by Court ― Focusing on Japanese and United Kingdom’s situations ―
0
조회
0
다운로드
13
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In child abuse cases, an administrative agency to take actions to protect a child against an abusing parent, a parental consent is necessary. In this respect, if a parent does not consent to it or if a parent asks her or his child to be home at any time after she or he agreed, it is the reality of our protection of abused children that the administrative agency should send the child back to the parent, according to the parental authority’s decision. In Japan, in a case of hindering a child’s welfare remarkably such as child abuse, taking actions to protect a child (protection measures) may approved by Family Court, according to Article 28 of the Child Welfare Act. In addition, these actions may be done even against a decision of parental authority. Separation and protection of a child against an abusing parent is proper. In this circumstance, substantial restrictions of the parental rights are possible, as well. However, there are no supplementary measures which are applicable, and support the system for abused children. This problem arises because there have been no definite provisions, concerning requirements of the Approval of Family Court. According to the United Kingdom’s Children Act, the court is able to make the care order by restricting parental responsibility, although a parent does not consent it. The British court has promoted integrating between parents and children as well as protecting abused children under the supervision of the court. This court’s guidance makes a local authority obliged to submit the care. In this respect, in order to restrict parental authority to protect an abused child, Korea also needs the regulatory system like Japan and United Kingdom, regardless of parental authority decisions. In addition, under this system, regulating the parental authority may be possible by judicial decisions of Family Court.
Abstract
In child abuse cases, an administrative agency to take actions to protect a child against an abusing parent, a parental consent is necessary. In this respect, if a parent does not consent to it or if a parent asks her or his child to be home at any time after she or he agreed, it is the reality of our protection of abused children that the administrative agency should send the child back to the parent, according to the parental authority’s decision. In Japan, in a case of hindering a child’s welfare remarkably such as child abuse, taking actions to protect a child (protection measures) may approved by Family Court, according to Article 28 of the Child Welfare Act. In addition, these actions may be done even against a decision of parental authority. Separation and protection of a child against an abusing parent is proper. In this circumstance, substantial restrictions of the parental rights are possible, as well. However, there are no supplementary measures which are applicable, and support the system for abused children. This problem arises because there have been no definite provisions, concerning requirements of the Approval of Family Court. According to the United Kingdom’s Children Act, the court is able to make the care order by restricting parental responsibility, although a parent does not consent it. The British court has promoted integrating between parents and children as well as protecting abused children under the supervision of the court. This court’s guidance makes a local authority obliged to submit the care. In this respect, in order to restrict parental authority to protect an abused child, Korea also needs the regulatory system like Japan and United Kingdom, regardless of parental authority decisions. In addition, under this system, regulating the parental authority may be possible by judicial decisions of Family Court.
참고문헌 (64)
- 전국아동학대현황보고서 2006년, "보건복지부", ~ (2007)
- 보건복지부, "아동학대 사례 개입을 위한 법률매뉴얼" (2007)
- 高橋重宏, "일본의 아동학대" (2007)
- 片桐由喜, "兒童虐待に關する判例硏究", 아세아여성법학, 통권 : 5 (2002), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 김상용, "가정위탁양육에 관한 민법상의 쟁점", 법조, 56(7), pp.94~147 (2007), 법조협회
- 오정수, "세계의 아동복지서비스-미국, 영국, 일본을 중심으로-" (2006)
- 우병창, "일본에 있어서 아동인권의 현황 -일본의 里親制度를 중심으로-", 가족법연구, 17(2) (2003), 한국가족법학회
- 이은정, "가정위탁(Foster Care)제도에 대한 소고", 가족법연구, 16(1) (2002), 한국가족법학회
- 이혜원, "아동권리와 아동복지", pp.407~ (2006)
- 이화숙, "가정폭력에 대한 영국가족관련법의 보호조치", 경원대 법학논총, 통권 : 3 (1996), 경원대학교 법학연구소
- 제철웅, "친권과 자녀의 권리의 충돌과 그 조정방향: 子의 인권을 중심으로", 아세아여성법학: 인권과 법 Ⅱ, 통권 : 9 (2006), 아세아여성법학연구소
- 조미경, "영국법상의 아동보호(Gillick 판결)―영국가족법학의 중심동향―", 가족법연구, 통권 : 9 (1995), 한국가족법학회
- 谷口知平, "新版 註釋民法(25)―親族(5): §834" (2004)
- 日本辯護士連合會子どもの權利委員會, (2006)
- 吉田恒雄, (1999)
- 峯本耕治, "子どもを虐待から守る制度と介入手法―イギリス兒童虐待防止制度から見た日本の課題―" (2001)
- 田澤あけみ, "20世紀兒童福祉の展開―イギリス兒童虐待防止の動向から探る" (2006)
- 川田 昇, "親權と子の利益" (2005)
- 深谷松男, (2001)
- 二宮周平, (2005)
- 石川稔, "子ども法の課題と展開" (2000)
- 小泉廣子, "イギリス1989年子ども法における子どもの緊急保護制度", 長崎國際大學論叢, 1 (2001), 長崎國際大學
- 若林昌子, "兒童虐待事件について家裁實務の視點から: 兒童福祉法 二八條事件を中心に", 法律時報, 77(3) (2005)
- 許斐有, "兒童福祉法による親權の制限―保護者による兒童虐待等の場合の强制的措置―", 淑德大學硏究紀要, 23 (1989), 淑德大學硏究公開委員會
- 許末惠, (1999)
- 許末惠, "イギリスにおける兒童虐待の法的對應", 家族<社會と法, 19 (2001), 日本家族<社會と法>學會(日本家除出版株式會社)
- 許末惠, "英國におけ る親責任をめぐる法規制について", 民商法雜誌, 136(4?5) (2007)
- 許末惠, "兒童虐待", 講座, 1992, pp.3, ~[DOI]
- 許末惠, "入所兒童福祉施設の種類を特定して措置を承認した事例", 民商法雜誌, 132(4?5) (2005)
- 吉田恒雄, "心理的虐待等による兒童の福祉施設入所措置の承認", 民商法雜誌, 125(3) (2001)
- 吉田恒雄, "兒童虐待と親權の制限", ジュリスト, 통권 : 1188 (2000)
- 吉田恒雄, (1999)
- 吉田恒雄, "兒童虐待防止法の改正に向けて―法的視點からの檢討―, 兒童虐待防止法制度―改正の課題と方向性" (2003)
- 石川稔, "兒童虐待をめぐる法政策と課題", ジュリスト, 통권 : 1188 (2000)
- 釜井裕子, "兒童福祉法 28條 1項 1號の家庭裁判所の承認のついて", 家裁月報, 50(4) (1998)
- 鈴木博人, "兒童福祉施設收容承認(繼父の性的虐待を放置した母)", 民商法雜誌, 129(4?5) (2004)
- 鈴木隆史, "里親制度の改革と法的對應について, 家族法改正への課題" (1993)
- 古畑淳, "被虐待兒に對する措置の決定過程における家庭裁判所と兒童相談所の役割", 神奈川大學大學院法學硏究論集, 통권 : 9 (2000)
- 古畑淳, "家庭裁判所の承認と福祉の措置の決定: 時の觀点から見た家庭裁判所と兒童相談所の機能分?", 山梨學院大學法學論集, 통권 : 46 (2000), 山梨學院大學法學硏究會
- 南方曉, "父親の虐待で家出した少女の施設入所を承認した事例", 民商法雜誌, 106(4) (1992)
- 川田 昇, "被虐待兒童の兒童養護施設への入所を承認した事例", 民商法雜誌, 125(1) (2001)
- 橋爪幸代, "親權者等の同意に基づかない被虐待兒童の處遇における課題―日英制度比較―", 家族<社會と法, 22 (2006), 日本家族<社會と法>學會(日本家除出版株式會社)
- 津崎哲郞, "親權制度の改革", ジュリスト, 통권 : 1059 (1995)
- 岩瀨純一, "子の監護にかんする諸問題, 離婚を中心とした家族法" (2002)
- 吉田彩, "家庭裁判所から見た兒童虐待の法的問題點", 家族<社會と法, 19 (2001), 日本家族<社會と法>學會(日本家除出版株式會社)
- 田中通裕, "第三者からの子の監護者の指定申立てが却下された事例", 判例タイムズ, 통권 : 1099 (2002)
- 米倉明, "親權槪念の轉換の必要性―親權は權利なのか義務なのか―", 家族法の硏究 (1999), 新靑出版
- 中村 惠, "わが國における親權法をめぐる現狀", 民商法雜誌, 136(4?5) (2007)
- 岩佐嘉彦, (1999)
- 岩佐嘉彦, "實務家から見た兒童虐待の法的問題: 監護權及び親權の問題を中心として", 家族<社會と法, 17 (2001), 日本家族<社會と法>學會(日本家除出版株式會社)
- ?脇美奈子, "兒童虐待と家庭裁判所, (臨時增刊)家事事件裁判例と實務 245題", 判例タイムズ, 통권 : 1100 (2002)
- 床谷文雄, "兒童虐待と福祉施設收容のための家庭裁判所の承認", 判例タイムズ, 통권 : 933 (1997)
- 大幡文德, "民事法的觀點からの兒童虐待防止の檢討, 兒童虐待と現代の家族: 實態の把握?診斷と今後の課題" (2003)
- 峯本耕治, "イギリスの兒童虐待防止制度と日本の課題, 兒童虐待防止法制度―改正の課題と方向性" (2003)
- 梶原和子, "わが國における兒童虐待防止體制の現狀と課題―裁判例を通して―", 九州看護福祉大學紀要, 7(1) (2005), 九州看護福祉大學
- "司法統計"[URL]
- Andrew Bainham, "Children - the Modern Law, Family Law (3rd ed., 2005)", ~ (2005)
- Jill M. Black BA, "Practical Approach to Family Law" (2004)
- Jonathan Herring, "Family Law" (2007)
- Nick Allen, "Making Sense of the Children Act 1989" (2005)
- Mika Oldham, "Blackstone’s Statutes on Family Law 2007-2008" (2007)
- N. Lowe, "Bromley’s Family Law, Butterworths: Lexis Law Pub(9th. ed., Jonathan Herring, Family Law)" (2007)
- S. M. Cretney, "Principles of Family Law" (2003)
- "Department of Health"[URL]