자동차손해배상 보장사업 법제의 법정책적 고찰
A Legal-Politics Study on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Business
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is designed to estimate and to interpret the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act deals with the Articles of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Business. this paper work is progressed to focus on the Articles 30-39 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. On general principle under the private legal system, the right of an individual injured in an automobile accident to be compensated by another person for injuries resulting from such an accident has primarily been predicated on an attribution of fault, in accordance with the principle that the economic cost of injuries to persons or property attributable to the fault of someone should be borne by the negligent party or a person responsible for the party's conduct. But when an injurer is financially irresponsible, innocent accident victim is not assured indemnification. For this instance, the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Business is stipulated in the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. In this paper, I suggest that, for the benefit of victim in the automobile accident, the coverage of the article 30.(1).1 and 2. should be widely and flexibly interpreted. And also I suggest to expansion the unsatisfied judgment funds.
Abstract
This paper is designed to estimate and to interpret the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act deals with the Articles of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Business. this paper work is progressed to focus on the Articles 30-39 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. On general principle under the private legal system, the right of an individual injured in an automobile accident to be compensated by another person for injuries resulting from such an accident has primarily been predicated on an attribution of fault, in accordance with the principle that the economic cost of injuries to persons or property attributable to the fault of someone should be borne by the negligent party or a person responsible for the party's conduct. But when an injurer is financially irresponsible, innocent accident victim is not assured indemnification. For this instance, the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Business is stipulated in the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act. In this paper, I suggest that, for the benefit of victim in the automobile accident, the coverage of the article 30.(1).1 and 2. should be widely and flexibly interpreted. And also I suggest to expansion the unsatisfied judgment funds.
참고문헌 (14)
- 김은경, "자동차책임보험법상 피해자의 지위-피해자의 직접청구권과 자동차손해배상보장기금에 대한 청구권에 대하여-", 상사법연구, 19(1) (1999)
- 김은경, "자동차손해배상보장기금에 대한 청구권의 법적 고찰", 기업법연구, 6 (2000)
- 김희수, "자동차손해배상보장사업 제도 개선방안", 월간 손해보험, 통(485) (2009)
- 박세민, "자동차보험법의 이론과 실무" (2007), 세창출판사
- 박세민, "자동차손해배상보장사업의 적용범위 등에 관한 소고", 보험학회지, (82), pp.95~132 (2009), 한국보험학회
- 박창수, "우리나라 교통사고 실태와 해결책", 월간 손해보험 (2010)
- 신상훈, "책임보험에서 제3자의 직접청구권", 월간 손해보험 (2010)
- 양승규, "보험법 제5판" (2004), 삼지원
- 양승규, "무보험자동차상해담보특약과 보험자대위", 월간 손해보험 (2004)
- 장덕조, "피해자 직접청구권과 피보험자 보험금청구권과의 관계 － 상법 제724조 제1항 해석에 관한 판례 법리의 비판 －", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.337~359 (2008), 한국상사법학회
- 주종완, "자동차손해배상보장제도 개선방향", 월간 손해보험 (2002)
- 사법연수원, "보험법 연구" (2005)
- 한국자동차후유장애인협회, "자동차손해배상 보장사업 활성화를 위한 국회 세미나 계획(안) 자료" (2008)
- Manfred Wandt, "Versicherungsrecht, 5.Aufl., Carl Heymanns Verlag" (2010)