자동차보험의 법적성격과 권리구제 개선방안
A Study on the legal nature and appeal system of automobile insurance
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
As social security in modern society has rapidly evolved and changed, different areas of social security have become segmented and specialized. The specialization and segmentation of social security programs can result in a number of disputes, big or small, over the distribution of benefits, leading to an increased need for national remedies in the area of social insurance. In 1963, the Automobile Accident Compensation Security Act(hereinafter "AACSA") was enacted to protect car accident victims and, in 1983, the Special Act for Traffic Accident Treatment was enacted. Since then, cars have been part and parcel of our daily lives. This study examines the legal nature of automobile insurance in connection with the AACSA and whether there are any problems in terms of the protection of people’s and victims’ rights. Since the legislative grounds for the AACSA are closely related to social security programs, including the protection of car accident victims against offenders, automobile liability insurance can be deemed to be public as a sort of social insurance. However, despite its nature of social insurance, under the current contradictory system, the legal mandate forces people to purchase car insurance run by private insurance companies, raising the following fundamental problems, especially the lack of remedies. Firstly, no appeal procedure is in place for health care organizations in connection with medical fees in automobile insurance. Secondly, no legal protection is provided to protect the rights of car accident victims. Though a few programs are in place to provide remedies for car accident victims, there is no legal protection that allows the victims to seek legal remedies through an appeal procedure. Since automobile insurance plays a role as social insurance, legal remedies should be in place to protect people’s legal rights. The nature of automobile insurance should be clearly established as public insurance whose purchase is a legal mandate, and amendments should be also made to the AACSA, such as new remedy provisions to provide protection against infringement arising out of insurance management. Furthermore, the government should provide assistance in the form of civil rights protection programs and grants, including the formation of the automobile insurance dispute arbitration center responsible for performing the aforementioned activities.
Abstract
As social security in modern society has rapidly evolved and changed, different areas of social security have become segmented and specialized. The specialization and segmentation of social security programs can result in a number of disputes, big or small, over the distribution of benefits, leading to an increased need for national remedies in the area of social insurance. In 1963, the Automobile Accident Compensation Security Act(hereinafter "AACSA") was enacted to protect car accident victims and, in 1983, the Special Act for Traffic Accident Treatment was enacted. Since then, cars have been part and parcel of our daily lives. This study examines the legal nature of automobile insurance in connection with the AACSA and whether there are any problems in terms of the protection of people’s and victims’ rights. Since the legislative grounds for the AACSA are closely related to social security programs, including the protection of car accident victims against offenders, automobile liability insurance can be deemed to be public as a sort of social insurance. However, despite its nature of social insurance, under the current contradictory system, the legal mandate forces people to purchase car insurance run by private insurance companies, raising the following fundamental problems, especially the lack of remedies. Firstly, no appeal procedure is in place for health care organizations in connection with medical fees in automobile insurance. Secondly, no legal protection is provided to protect the rights of car accident victims. Though a few programs are in place to provide remedies for car accident victims, there is no legal protection that allows the victims to seek legal remedies through an appeal procedure. Since automobile insurance plays a role as social insurance, legal remedies should be in place to protect people’s legal rights. The nature of automobile insurance should be clearly established as public insurance whose purchase is a legal mandate, and amendments should be also made to the AACSA, such as new remedy provisions to provide protection against infringement arising out of insurance management. Furthermore, the government should provide assistance in the form of civil rights protection programs and grants, including the formation of the automobile insurance dispute arbitration center responsible for performing the aforementioned activities.
참고문헌 (30)
- 고신정, "자보 지출내역 낱낱이 공개하라", 의협신문, ~ (2011)
- 김영훈, "지역의료보험의 보험료 이전효과 분석", 사회보장연구, 5 (1989), 한국사회보장학회
- 김동희, "행정법Ⅰ론" (1999), 박영사
- 건강보험 의무가입과 재정통합, "김영용", 자유기업원, ~ (2002)
- 김정렬, "자동차손해배상제도 해설: 자동차손해배상보장법령 및 자동차보험약관 해설" (2001), 청화
- 김진수, "사회보험의 중복급여체제 개선방안에 관한 연구- 산재보험과 국민연금의 중복급여를 중심으로 -", 사회보장연구, 19(2)통권 : 28, pp.35~62 (2003), 한국사회보장학회
- 대한의사협회, "자동차보험 진료수가 심사업무위탁 관련 법안에 대한 대한의사협회 의견", 대한의사협회, ~ (2011)
- 문영화, "자동차손해배상보장법 제28조 제2항의 취지와 교통사고의 피해자가 보장사업자로부터 보상금을수령하면서 향후 가해자측으로부터 손해배상금을 받을 경우에 보상금을 반환하기로 하는 약정의의미, In 대법원판례해설 제55호" (2005)
- 박상범, "사회보험론" (1999), 세종출판사
- 박세민, "자동차손해배상보장사업의 적용범위 등에 관한 소고", 보험학회지, (82), pp.95~132 (2009), 한국보험학회
- 배성민, "車보험료 치료비 비중, 한국이 獨 8배 이유는", 머니투데이, ~ (2011)
- 보험미래포럼, "건강보험의 진화와 미래" (2012), 21세기북스
- 송기민, "현행 사회보험 권리구제제도의 문제점 및 개선방안", 사회보장연구, 22(2), pp.183~208 (2006), 한국사회보장학회
- 2005년 교통사고비용 추정, "심재익", 한국교통연구원, ~, pp.정책연구 2007-05 (2007)
- 양승규, "보험법" (2005), 삼지원
- 양승규, "자동차강제책임보험의 이론과 실제 – 자동차손해배상보장법을 중심으로 -", 법학, 2 (1972), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 유광호, "사회보장발달사" (2005), 유풍출판사
- 이순득, "한국의 ‘국민건강보험법’과 독일의 의료보험제도에 관한 비교 연구 : 독일의 ‘보건개혁 2000’을 중심으로", 석사, 인구학, pp.2000
- 이용갑, "독일의 공적 의료보험 개혁 동향", 건강보험포럼, (겨울호) (2007)
- 이재복, "자동차보험론" (2008), 두양사
- 2007 독일 의료보험의 개혁, "이준영", FES, ~, pp.FES-Information-Series, 2007-05 (2007)
- 장덕조, "人身損害에 대한 無過失補償과 自動車保險 ― 뉴질랜드制度의 評價를 中心으로 ―", 상사법연구, 25(3), pp.195~220 (2006), 한국상사법학회
- 전광석, "한국사회보장법론" (2005), 법문사
- 자동차보험 진료체계 개선을 위한기초연구 – 자동차사고 환자 입원․통원 가이드라인 연구, "정수교", 국토해양부․가톨릭대학교 산학협력단, ~ (2011)
- 정규, "자동차손해배상 보장사업 법제의 법정책적 고찰", 법과정책연구, 10(3), pp.1243~1261 (2010), 한국법정책학회
- 대법원, "5.28. 선고, 2009다9294,9300 판결", ~ (2009)
- 대법원, "12. 27. 선고, 2007다54450 판결", ~ (2007)
- 대법원, "4. 15. 선고, 2003다62477 판결", ~ (2005)
- 헌법재판소, "6. 29 선고, 99헌마289 결정", ~ (2002)
- 헌법재판소, "5. 28. 선고 96헌가6․7, 95헌바58(병합)결정", ~ (1998)
