캡스톤 디자인 수업에서 학생들의 주제 결정 패턴 탐색
Exploring Topic Defining Patterns of Students in Interdisciplinary Capstone Design Class
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The goal of this study was to explore topic defining patterns of students in interdisciplinary Capstone Design Class. Thematic analysismethodology was used to examine 85 Korean college students’ lived experience of project topic generation which is for interdisciplinarycapstone design class and Individual open-ended survey for constituted the data sources. Findings show four contexts of student’stopic defining patterns using thematic analysis including (a) one leader’s directed problem representation, (b) team common decisionmaking after brainstorming, (c) empathy with professor proposed issue, (d) problems offered to students by corporate or researchcompetitions. Based on research result, I could suggest instructional strategies of Capstone Design Class of teacher for helping theirstudents’ topic defining. It was necessary to minimize the opinions of the instructors at the beginning of class and minimize thenumber of team members. And also it provided a lot of opportunities to collaborate with companies in the topic selection process,it will help to develop the students' ability to determine the valuable topic in project.
Abstract
The goal of this study was to explore topic defining patterns of students in interdisciplinary Capstone Design Class. Thematic analysismethodology was used to examine 85 Korean college students’ lived experience of project topic generation which is for interdisciplinarycapstone design class and Individual open-ended survey for constituted the data sources. Findings show four contexts of student’stopic defining patterns using thematic analysis including (a) one leader’s directed problem representation, (b) team common decisionmaking after brainstorming, (c) empathy with professor proposed issue, (d) problems offered to students by corporate or researchcompetitions. Based on research result, I could suggest instructional strategies of Capstone Design Class of teacher for helping theirstudents’ topic defining. It was necessary to minimize the opinions of the instructors at the beginning of class and minimize thenumber of team members. And also it provided a lot of opportunities to collaborate with companies in the topic selection process,it will help to develop the students' ability to determine the valuable topic in project.
참고문헌 (28)
- 권순각, "지속적인 기업체 연계 프로젝트 기반의 캡스톤 설계 운영시스템", 공학교육연구, 16(3), pp.61~68 (2013), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 김영민, "잘 알려진 창의적 과학자들의 과학적 문제 발견 패턴 분석", 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), pp.1285~1299 (2013), 한국과학교육학회[DOI]
- 김은경, "창의적 공학설계" (2013), 한빛아카데미
- 박경선, "공학교육에서의 팀티칭기반 융합프로젝트중심 교수학습모형의 개발", 공학교육연구, 17(2), pp.11~24 (2014), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 변문경, "공대 학생들의 프로젝트 주제 선정을 위한 초기 교수학습 지원방안 탐구", 공학교육연구, 19(1), pp.37~46 (2016), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 신재현, "창의성 발현을 위한 구조화된 문제해결 절차, 약인가, 독인가?: 사례를 통한 탐험적 연구", 인사조직연구, 22(4), pp.103~139 (2014), 한국인사조직학회
- 창의·융합지향형공학교육혁신전략-공학교육혁신센터중심, "이요한", 한국산업기술진흥원, ~, pp.산학협력이슈 BRIEF 2015-4 (2015)
- 이태식, "공학대학 캡스톤 디자인(창의적 공학 설계) 교육과정 운영실태 및 학습 만족도 조사", 공학교육연구, 12(2), pp.36~50 (2009), 한국공학교육학회[DOI]
- 조일현, "대학 프로젝트 수업 환경에서 분업화, 상호작용, 공유정신모형이 팀 수행성과와 개인 학습에 미치는 영향", 교육공학연구, 26(3), pp.1~20 (2010), 한국교육공학회
- 조준동, "창의융합 프로젝트 아이디어 북" (2015), 한빛아카데미
- Anderson, J. R., "Cognitive psychology and its implications 7E" (2010), Worth publishers
- Amabile, T. M., "Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity", The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), pp.3~15 (2012)
- Bailin, S, "Achieving extraordinary ends: An essay on creativity" (2012), Springer Science & Business Media
- Braun, V., "Using thematic analysis in psychology", Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), pp.77~101 (2006)
- Capraro R. M., "STEM Project-Based Learning: An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach" (2013), SENSE PUBLISHERS
- The use of instructional interventions: Lean learning environments as a solution for a design problem. Handling complexity in learning environments: Research and theory, "Elen, J.", 185~200 (2006)
- Davis, G. A., "Creativity is forever" (2004), Hunt Publishing Company
- Dunlap, J. C., "Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession", Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(1), pp.65~83 (2005)
- Getzels, J. W., "Individual differences in pupil perceptions of school problems", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53, pp.307~316 (1983)
- Hotaling, N., "A Quantitative Analysis of the Effects of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Course", Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), pp.630~656 (2012)
- Järvelä, S., "Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: designing for CSCL regulation tools", Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(1), pp.125~142 (2015)
- Moore, R., "Taking action: Assessing the impact of preservice teaching on learning", Action in Teacher Education, 28(3), pp.53~60 (2006)
- Palmer, S., "An evaluation of a project based learning initiative in engineering education", European Journal of Engineering Education, 36(4), pp.357~365 (2011)
- Robert M. C., "STEM Project-Based Learning, An Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach" (2013), SENSE PUBLISHERS
- Runco, M. A., "Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity", pp.40~76 (1994), Ablex
- Innovating pedagogy 2016:Open university innovation report 5, "Sharples, M.", ~ (2016)
- Walsh, E., "Reclaiming creativity in the era of impact: Exploring ideas about creative research in science and engineering", Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), pp.1259~1273 (2013)
- Zacher, H., "Leadership and creativity in higher education", Studies in Higher Education, 40(7), pp.1210~1225 (2015)