본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

채권추심명령을 통한 소송사기죄에서 재산상 이익의 취득과 기수시기

The meaning of ‘obtaining pecuniary advantage’ and the time of consummation in procedural fraud committed through creditor’s collection order

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Procedural fraud is a type of a so–called triangular fraud targeting to mislead the judgment of the court, which differs from the structure of a general fraud in that it has some aspects of deeming it sufficient to satisfy its constituent elements. When a broad-minded approach is taken to interpret the element of ‘pecuniary advantage’ in the context of fraud, it is not impossible to construct a theory that procedural fraud in compulsory execution is consummated when a judgment of the executive court at the intermediate stage of the enforcement process is identified as such ‘pecuniary advantage’. However, since the compulsory execution procedure is a series of procedures in which various actions are cumulatively carried out to satisfy the claim based on court judgment/arbitral award which has become final and conclusive, the time of consummation should be when the claim is satisfied or when the compulsory execution procedure terminate. Regarding the time of consummation of procedural fraud, which is related to the issuance of a collection order in a compulsory execution procedure, it is insufficient for the execution creditor merely to obtain an issuance of a collection order but further need the satisfaction of claim by actually collecting the seized claim etc.

Abstract

Procedural fraud is a type of a so–called triangular fraud targeting to mislead the judgment of the court, which differs from the structure of a general fraud in that it has some aspects of deeming it sufficient to satisfy its constituent elements. When a broad-minded approach is taken to interpret the element of ‘pecuniary advantage’ in the context of fraud, it is not impossible to construct a theory that procedural fraud in compulsory execution is consummated when a judgment of the executive court at the intermediate stage of the enforcement process is identified as such ‘pecuniary advantage’. However, since the compulsory execution procedure is a series of procedures in which various actions are cumulatively carried out to satisfy the claim based on court judgment/arbitral award which has become final and conclusive, the time of consummation should be when the claim is satisfied or when the compulsory execution procedure terminate. Regarding the time of consummation of procedural fraud, which is related to the issuance of a collection order in a compulsory execution procedure, it is insufficient for the execution creditor merely to obtain an issuance of a collection order but further need the satisfaction of claim by actually collecting the seized claim etc.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 김성돈, "형법각론" (2016), 성균관대학교 출판부
  2. 김일수, (1997), 박영사
  3. 이시윤, "신민사집행법" (2009), 박영사
  4. 이재상, "형법각론" (2012), 박영사
  5. 이주원, "특별형법" (2016), 弘文社
  6. 임 웅, "형법각론" (2016), 법문사
  7. 김상원, (2004), 한국사법행정학회
  8. 김상원, (2004), 한국사법행정학회
  9. 박재윤, (2006), 한국사법행정학회
  10. (2003), 법원행정처
  11. (2003), 법원행정처
  12. 大塚仁, "大コンメンタール刑法 제13권" (2000), 청림서원
  13. 김관구, "소송사기죄에 대한 실무적 재검토", 사법논집, 56 (2013), 법원도서관
  14. 김경수, "허위의 피담보채권에 기초하여 유치권에 의한 경매를 신청한 경우소송사기죄의 실행의 착수에 해당하는지 여부", 대법원판례해설, (94) (2013), 법원도서관
  15. 金禹辰, "訴訟詐欺의 理論的 基礎 및 그 構成要件에 대한 諸檢討 : 大法院 判例를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1993
  16. 노태악, "소송사기의 구성요건적 분석 ― 최근 대법원 판례를 중심으로", 사법연수원논문집, 1 (2004), 사법연수원
  17. 박동률, "소송사기의 착수시기와 기수시기에 관한 몇가지 문제", 법학논고, 25 (2006), 경북대학교 출판부
  18. 박종민, "지급명령신청에 의한 소송사기와 그 기수시기", 대법원판례해설, (50) (2004), 법원도서관
  19. 안경옥, "소송사기의 가벌성", 형사판례연구, 10 (2002), 박영사
  20. 윤상도, "소송사기 ― 대법원과 일본의 판례를 중심으로", 재판실무연구 (2003), 광주지방법원
  21. 정진수, "정의로운 사법(이용훈대법원장 재임기념)" (2011), 사법발전재단
  22. 조관행, "재판자료 35집: 강제집행 ·임의경매에 관한 제문제(상)" (1987), 법원행정처
  23. 조국, "부동산소유권 보존등기말소청구를 통한 소송사기의 성립요건, 실행의 착수시기 및 기수시기", 비교형사법연구, 8(2), pp.365~380 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
  24. 천진호, "소취하와 사기죄에 있어서 재산적 처분행위", 비교형사법연구, 5(1) (2003), 한국비교형사법학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (17건)