근대한국어 자료의 ‘者’ 구문에 대한 문법사적 고찰
A Study on the zhe (者)-construction in Early Modern Korean in the Historical Linguistic Perspective
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The present paper investigates the characteristics of the Korean sentences of Early Modern Korean corresponding to the Chinese zhe (者)-construction. In Classical Chinese, zhe is a polyfunctional morpheme (or word) that plays a role as a nominalizer, a relativizer, topicalizer, and so on. In this paper, I first classify the zhe-constructions in Classical Chinese by their surface functions. Subsequently, I gather the Korean translations from seventeenth and eighteenth century, divide them into the zhe-construction types established above, and examine the variations in Korean translation with frequency analyses. According to the result, the Korean translations of zhe-construction also show diversity and bear interesting variations. The comparison between seventeenth and eighteenth century does not show a significant differences in most of the cases. However, I can find some constructional changes including the change in the nominalizing suffixes, the change of subordinating function of zhe, the functional change in relativizer zhe which might be induced by Korean-to-Chinese interference, and so on. Last but not least, a variety of Korean constructions are used for the Chinese post-nominal relative clause in order to compensate the word order discrepancy between Chinese and Korean.
Abstract
The present paper investigates the characteristics of the Korean sentences of Early Modern Korean corresponding to the Chinese zhe (者)-construction. In Classical Chinese, zhe is a polyfunctional morpheme (or word) that plays a role as a nominalizer, a relativizer, topicalizer, and so on. In this paper, I first classify the zhe-constructions in Classical Chinese by their surface functions. Subsequently, I gather the Korean translations from seventeenth and eighteenth century, divide them into the zhe-construction types established above, and examine the variations in Korean translation with frequency analyses. According to the result, the Korean translations of zhe-construction also show diversity and bear interesting variations. The comparison between seventeenth and eighteenth century does not show a significant differences in most of the cases. However, I can find some constructional changes including the change in the nominalizing suffixes, the change of subordinating function of zhe, the functional change in relativizer zhe which might be induced by Korean-to-Chinese interference, and so on. Last but not least, a variety of Korean constructions are used for the Chinese post-nominal relative clause in order to compensate the word order discrepancy between Chinese and Korean.
참고문헌 (28)
- 박향란, "고대 중국어 관계절의 유형, 분포 및 의미", 언어과학연구, (82), pp.137~158 (2017), 언어과학회[DOI]
- 박형달, "15세기 국어의 관형형에 나타나는 교체음운(ㅗ", ㅜ)의 기능에 관하여, 1968, pp.4(2), 11~27[DOI]
- 양정호, "名詞形 語尾 體系의 變化에 대하여", 어문연구(語文硏究), 33(4), pp.57~80 (2005), 한국어문교육연구회
- 이지영, "중세국어의 특이 관형사절 구성에 대한 일고찰", 인문과학연구논총, 39(2), pp.13~48 (2018), 인문과학연구소[DOI]
- 이지영, "중세국어 자료의 ‘者’ 구문에 대한 문법사적 해석", 서강대학교 언어정보연구소 2019년 신년학술대회 발표자료집, pp.31~47 (2019)
- 이 용, "차자표기 자료의 ‘者’구문에 대한 문법사적 고찰", 서강대학교 언어정보연구소 2019년 신년학술대회 발표자료집, pp.11~28 (2019)
- 李忠九, "經書 諺解 연구", 박사, 국어국문학, pp.1990
- 이현희, "강신항선생회갑기념국어학논문집", pp.681~703 (1990), 기곡강신항선생회갑기념논문집간행위원회
- 이현희, "중세국어 구문연구" (1994), 신구문화사
- 정만호, "『사서율곡선생언해』 연구", 한문학논집, 20, pp.215~236 (2002), 근역한문학회
- 정재영, "‘-오-’의 변화", 국어사연구, pp.601~643 (1997), 국어사학회
- 채 완, "명사화소 ‘-기’에 대하여", 국어학, 8, pp.95~107 (1979), 국어학회
- 陈丹丹, "汉语史上关系從句的类型学考察", 博士, pp.2009
- 姚振武, "关于自指和转指", 古汉语研究, 1994(3), pp.10~15 (1994)
- 王 力, "古代漢語" (2006), 中華書局
- 吴怀成, "古汉语“者": 自指和转指如何统一", 中国语文, 378, pp.277~289 (2017)
- 朱德熙, "自指和轉指", 方言, 1, pp.16~31 (1983)
- Aldridge, E., "Historical Syntax and Linguistic Theory", pp.233~249 (2009), Oxford University Press
- Comrie, B., "Language Universals and Linguistic Typology" (1989), The University of Chicago Press
- Dixon, R. M. W., "Basic Linguistic Theory 2: Grammatical Topics" (2010), Oxford University Press
- Haiman, J., "Conditionals are topics", Language, 54(3), pp.564~589 (1978)
- Harbsmeier, C., "Aspects of Classical Chinese Syntax" (1981), Curzon Press
- Hawkins, J., "Word Order Universals" (1983), Academic Press
- Lehmann, W., "A structural principle of language and its implication", Language, 49(1), pp.47~66 (1973)
- Pulleyblank, E., "Outline of Classical Chinese Grammar" (1995), UBC Press
- Schachter, P., "Focus and relativization", Language, 49(1), pp.19~46 (1973)
- Thomason, S. G., "Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics" (1988), University of California Press
- Yap, F., "Nominalization in Asian Languages: Diachronic and Typological Perspectives" (2011), John Benjamins