본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

아동의 인지양식이 학업 자아개념 및 자기노출에 미치는 효과

Effects of Children's Cognitive Styles on Academic Self-Concept and Self-Disclosure

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류교육학

초록

본 연구는 아동의 인지양식이 학업 자아개념과 자기노출에 미치는 효과를 알아보고자 실시하였다. 인지양식(장독립형 ․ 장의존형)에 따라 학업 자아개념(학업 능력, 수업, 학업성취 자아개념)과 자기노출(부모,친구, 교사와의 자기노출) 차이를 검증하기 위한 연구이다. 초등학교 6학년 76명 중 연구 대상에 적합한45명을 대상으로 하였다. 집단잠입도형(GEFT) 척도를 통해 장독립형 ․ 장의존형 집단으로 각각 25, 20명씩 구성하였다. 활용된 검사도구는 학업 자아개념 검사도구와 자기노출 검사도구이다. 얻어진 자료를 바탕으로 집단간 평균 및 표준편차, 평균차이 검정(t-test)을 실시하였으며, 인지양식 집단별 학업 자아개념과자기노출에 대한 상관분석을 실시하였다. 연구 결과, 인지양식에 따라 학업 자아개념은 통계적으로 유의한차이를 보였다(p<.01). 자기노출에 있어서 통계적으로 부분적인 유의한 차이를 발견하였다. 또한 인지양식별 학업 자아개념과 자기노출에 상이한 정적 상관을 발견하였다. 연구 결과에 비추어 볼 때, 교수 ․ 학습현장에서 학습자의 인지양식에 적합한 교수활동을 전개하는 것이 바람직하며, 인지양식에 대한 새로운 시각과 적절한 교육적 활용이 요구된다.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify the effects of children's cognitive styles on academic self-concept and self-disclosure. According to cognitive styles (field independence and field dependence), the differences of academic self-concept (academic achievement, lessons, and academic achievement self-perception) and self-disclosure (exposures to parents, friends, and teachers) were examined. There were forty-five participants in this study who were all sixth graders of an elementary school. Through the group embedded figure test (GEFT), the participants were divided into two groups: the field independence group of twenty-five participants and field dependence group of twenty participants, respectively. An academic self-concept test and a self-disclosure test were carried out. Based on the data gathered, each group's means, standard variation, and t-test were calculated. A correlation between group academic self-concept and self-disclosure was also analyzed. The results show that there was a significant difference in academic self-concept (p<.01) and a slight significant difference in self-disclosure in terms of cognitive styles. There was also a positive correlation between academic self-concept and self-disclosure in terms of cognitive styles. To sum up, it is desirable that teaching activities which are appropriate to the learners' cognitive styles should be executed in the teaching and learning field. Also, proper educational applications and a new way of looking at cognitive styles are both required.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 구병두, "학업성취 관련변인" (1996), 양서원
  2. 金龍來, "學業成績에 대한 寄與變因의 影響力 分析", 박사, pp.1993
  3. 송인섭, "인간의 자아개념 탐구" (1998), 학지사
  4. 신수경, "장독립적-장의존적 인지양식에 따른 유아의 의사소통전략과 사회성 분석", 어린이미디어연구, 9(1), pp.243~258 (2010), 한국어린이미디어학회
  5. Berger, C. R., "Interpersonal communication theory and research: An overview, In Communication yearbook 1", pp.217~228 (1977), Transaction
  6. Berry, J. W., "Cultural variations in cognitive style, In Bio-psycho-social Factors in Cognitive Style", pp.289~308 (1990), Erlbaum
  7. Bloom, B. S., "Human Characteristics and School Learning" (1976), McGraw-Hill
  8. Borich, G. D., "Effective Teaching Methods" (2000), Prentice Hall
  9. Busato, V. V., "Intellectual abilities, learning style, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education", Personalities and Individual Differences, 29(6), pp.1057~1068 (2000)
  10. Chadwick, A., "Internet politics : States, citizens, and new communication technologies" (2006), Oxford University Press
  11. Chou, C., "The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system", Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(2), pp.151~176 (1998)
  12. Coolry, E., "Self-concept and success-failure attributions of learning disabled and non-handicapped students", Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, pp.174~178 (1988)
  13. Cozby, P. C., "Self-disclosure : A literature Review", Psychological Bulletin, 79, pp.79~91 (1973)
  14. Davis, J. K., "An information processing view of field dependence- independence, In Cognitive Style and Early Education", pp.61~78 (1990), Gordon and Breach Science
  15. Dies, R. R., "Group therapist self-disclosure; An evaluation by clients", J. of Counseling Psychology, 20, pp.344~348 (1973)
  16. Dester, J. A., "Interview disclosure modeling, information revealed and interviewer verbal behavior", Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, pp.420~426 (1974)
  17. Dweck, C. S., "A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality", Psychological Review, 95, pp.256~273 (1988)
  18. Felker, D. W., "Building Positive Self Concepts" (1974), Burgress Publishing Co
  19. Fromm, E., "Sex and character, In The family : It's Function and destiny", pp.375~392 (1949), Harper
  20. Gardner, R. W., "Cognitive controls of attention deployment as determinants of visual illusions", Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, pp.120~129 (1961)
  21. Goodenough, D. R., "The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory", Psychological Bulletin, 83, pp.675~694 (1976)
  22. Grabinger, R. S., "Rich environments for active learning : a definition", ALT-J, 3(2), pp.5~34 (1995)
  23. Gregorc, A. F., "An adult's guide to style" (1982), Gregorc Associates
  24. Harper, B., "Constructivist simulations : a new design paradigm", Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(2), pp.115~130 (2000)
  25. Holzman, P. S., "Cognitive system-principles of leveling and sharpening : Individual differences in visual time-error assimilation effects", Journal of Psychology, 37, pp.105~122 (1954)
  26. Jersild, A. T., "In search of self" (1952), Bureau of Publications, Teachers College. columbia University
  27. Jih, H. J., "Mental models : A research focus for interactive learning systems", Educational Technology Research and Development, 40(3), pp.39~53 (1992)
  28. Jonassen, D. H., "Handbook of individual difference, learning, and instruction" (1993), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  29. Jourard, M. S., "Self-disclosure : An Experimental Analysis of the Transparent Self" (1971), Wiley Interscience
  30. Kagan, J., "Learning and the educational process", pp.133~161 (1965), Rand McNally
  31. Kagan, J., "Individual variation in cognitive process, In Carmichael's manual of child psychology(3rd ed)", pp.1273~1365 (1970), John Willey
  32. Keefe, J. W., "Assessment of learning style variables : the NASSP task force model", Theory into practice, 24, pp.138~144 (1985)
  33. Leader, L. F., "The Effects of Search Tool and Cognitive Style on Performance During Hypermedia Database Searches", Educational technology research and development, 44(20), pp.5~16 (1996)
  34. Lecky, P., "Self-consistency : A theory of Personality" (1945), Island Press
  35. Means, T. B., "Enhancing relevance : Embedded ARCS strategies vs. purpose", Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), pp.5~18 (1997)
  36. Lin, C., "Effects of Linking Structure and Cognitive Style on Students", Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(4), pp.317~329 (1996)
  37. Marsh, H. W., "Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement and research, In Psychological perspectives on the self(Vol, 4)", pp.59~98 (1993), Erlbaum
  38. The Impact of Cognitive Styles and Educational Computer Environments on Learning Performance, "Parkinson, A. P.", Computer Sc Dept Trinity College, ~, pp.Tech. Rep: CS-2002 (2002)
  39. Perret-Celrmont, A. N., "Social interaction and cognitive development in children" (1980), Academic press
  40. Purkey, W. W., "Invitational theory: Legacy of Sidney M. Jourard, In Invitations to dialogue: The contributions of Sidney M. Jourard", pp.1999, Kendall
  41. Ridding, R., "Cognitive Styles:An Overview and Integration", Educational Psychology, 11(3, pp.4) (1991), 193~216
  42. Riding, R., "The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, pp.297~307 (1993)
  43. Roberts, M. J., "Understanding Strategy Selection", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 54, pp.137~154 (2001)
  44. Rogers, C. R., "Client-centered therapy" (1951), Houghton Mifflin Company
  45. Schneider, C., "Shame, Exposure and Privacy" (1977), Beacon
  46. Shapiro, G. S., "Therapeutic conditions and disclosure beyond the therapeutic encounter", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 13, pp.290~294 (1969)
  47. Shavelson, R. J., "Self-concept : Validation of construct interpretations", Review of Education Research, 46, pp.407~441 (1976)
  48. Sheriff, D. E., "Field-Dependence", Field Independence and Instructional Development, 1980, ~
  49. Simonson, N. R., "Self-disclosure by the professional and paraprofessional therapists", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, pp.359~363 (1974)
  50. Taylor, R. L., "Exceptional children: integration research and teaching" (1989), Florida Atlantic Univ. Boca Roton
  51. Tinajero, C., "Field dependence-independence and academic achievement : a re-examination of their relationship", British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(2), pp.199~212 (1997)
  52. Witkin, H. A., "Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective", Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, pp.5~87 (1975)
  53. Witkin, H. A., "Field-independent cognitive style and their educational implications", Review of Educational Research, 47(1), pp.1~64 (1977)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)