본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

규범통제 관점에서 방송통신심의위원회 직무규정 분석 - 문제점과 개선방안 도출을 중심으로 -

Content and Application of the Legal Review on Norm - Focusing on Provisions of Tasks for Korea Communications Standard Commission -

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Content and Application of the Legal Review on Norm- Focusing on Provisions of Tasksfor Korea Communications Standard Commission - Joung, Youn-Boo There has been a growing interest in science of legislation. It is very important to supply high quality legislation so as to reduce social costs as well as to pursue lawful legislation. The importance of legislation was made evident by the recent tragedy in South Korea. One opinion on the reason for the cause of the so-called 'sunken ferry Sewol accident', which occurred on April 16th, 2014, insists the accident may have started from the revision of enforcement rule of the Marine Transportation Act in 2009. The provision on the legal limit for the age of a passenger ship was extended from twenty years to thirty years in the amendment. All legislators are supposed to consider a wide variety of factors to make a high quality legislation. The factors that legislators look into could be composed of a legal element and a nonlegal element. A nonlegal element contributes to making a legislation more useful. Meanwhile, a legal element is an indispensable requisite of a legislation which could be deduced from the Legal Review on Norm. This study analyzes the content of the Legal Review on Norm and then applies the content to a concrete case. In this way, this paper attempts to show an essential factor for legislation. the Legal Review on Norm has been mainly discussed on the elements of content and form. In addition, this research adds a discussion on the title of legislation as well. Therefore, the Legal Review on Norm is researched from the perspective of title, form and content of legislation. If the Legal Review on Norm is analyzed only from legal theories, it would be difficult to concretely portray how the indispensable legal requisite of it applies to a legislation. To obtain a specific result, this paper supplements with Provisions of Tasks for Korea Communications Standard Commission as another topic of this paper. Therefore, this study applies the factors of title, form and content to the provisions. Futhermore, it identifies problems and improvement proposals for the provisions. As mentioned above, this paper points out the concrete contents of the Legal Review on Norm. The immediate goal of this research is to seek the problems and improvement methods for Provisions of Tasks for Korea Communications Standard Commission. By extension, the secondary aim of this study is to specifically show indispensable legal requisites which is required in legislation.

Abstract

Content and Application of the Legal Review on Norm- Focusing on Provisions of Tasksfor Korea Communications Standard Commission - Joung, Youn-Boo There has been a growing interest in science of legislation. It is very important to supply high quality legislation so as to reduce social costs as well as to pursue lawful legislation. The importance of legislation was made evident by the recent tragedy in South Korea. One opinion on the reason for the cause of the so-called 'sunken ferry Sewol accident', which occurred on April 16th, 2014, insists the accident may have started from the revision of enforcement rule of the Marine Transportation Act in 2009. The provision on the legal limit for the age of a passenger ship was extended from twenty years to thirty years in the amendment. All legislators are supposed to consider a wide variety of factors to make a high quality legislation. The factors that legislators look into could be composed of a legal element and a nonlegal element. A nonlegal element contributes to making a legislation more useful. Meanwhile, a legal element is an indispensable requisite of a legislation which could be deduced from the Legal Review on Norm. This study analyzes the content of the Legal Review on Norm and then applies the content to a concrete case. In this way, this paper attempts to show an essential factor for legislation. the Legal Review on Norm has been mainly discussed on the elements of content and form. In addition, this research adds a discussion on the title of legislation as well. Therefore, the Legal Review on Norm is researched from the perspective of title, form and content of legislation. If the Legal Review on Norm is analyzed only from legal theories, it would be difficult to concretely portray how the indispensable legal requisite of it applies to a legislation. To obtain a specific result, this paper supplements with Provisions of Tasks for Korea Communications Standard Commission as another topic of this paper. Therefore, this study applies the factors of title, form and content to the provisions. Futhermore, it identifies problems and improvement proposals for the provisions. As mentioned above, this paper points out the concrete contents of the Legal Review on Norm. The immediate goal of this research is to seek the problems and improvement methods for Provisions of Tasks for Korea Communications Standard Commission. By extension, the secondary aim of this study is to specifically show indispensable legal requisites which is required in legislation.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. 김민호, "법률유보의 한계와 위임입법", 공법연구, 28(4) (2000), 한국공법학회
  2. 김승환, "입법의 원칙", 세계헌법연구, 12(2), pp.47~68 (2006), 세계헌법학회한국학회
  3. 김철수, "헌법학개론" (2007), 박영사
  4. 박창석, "미국의 州헌법상 “Single Subject Rule”에 관한 고찰", 미국헌법연구, 24(2), pp.169~195 (2013), 미국헌법학회
  5. 입법학에 관한 선진 외국의 연구결과 분석과 정책적 활용방안, "배병호", 법제처, ~ (2010)
  6. 성낙인, "헌법학 제9판" (2009), 법문사
  7. 이광윤, "최신행정법론" (2002), 법문사
  8. 전종익, "포괄위임금지원칙의 심사기준", 아주법학, 7(3), pp.11~34 (2013), 법학연구소
  9. 정극원, "헌법재판에서의 포괄적 위임입법금지 원칙의 적용", 헌법학연구, 15(3), pp.461~486 (2009), 한국헌법학회
  10. 정남철, "明確性原則의 判斷基準과 司法審査의 限界", 법조, 57(9), pp.109~136 (2008), 법조협회
  11. 정연부, "방송통신심의위원회의 법적 지위 재구성 방안 모색", 공법연구, 41(1), pp.371~395 (2012), 한국공법학회
  12. 정연부, "방송ㆍ통신에 대한 내용규제와 규제기관의 법적 지위 : 심의와 방송통신심위위원회를 중심으로", 원광법학, 28(1), pp.297~325 (2012), 법학연구소
  13. 한수웅, "본질성 이론과 입법위임의 명확성원칙", 헌법논총, 14 (2003), 헌법재판소
  14. David Schoenbrod, "Power without Responsibility" (1993), Yale University Press
  15. Martha J. Dragich, "State Constitutional Restrictions on Legislative Procedure: Rethinking the Analysis of Original Purpose, Single Subject, and Clear Title Challenges", Harv. J. on Legis, 38, pp.103~ (2001)
  16. Michael D. Gilbert, "Single Subject Rules and the Legislative Process", U. Pitt. L. Rev, 67, pp.803~ (2006)
  17. Robert D. Cooter, "A Theory of Direct Democracy and the Single Subject Rule", Colum. L. Rev, 110, pp.687~ (2010)
  18. Robert F. Williams, "Special Issue on Legislation: Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation", U. Pitt. L. Rev, 48, pp.797~ (1987)
  19. Paul Kirchhof, Handbuch des Staatsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland Band Ⅲ, "Vorrang und Vorbehalt des Gesetzes: Josef Isensee", pp.1988, Fritz Ossenbühl
  20. Reinhard Hermes, "Der Bereich des parlamentsgesetzes" (1988), Duncker & Humblot

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)