본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

해상재난관리체계의 법적 문제점과 개선방안 - 여객선 세월호 침몰사건을 중심으로 -

The Legal Problem and the Improvement of the Disaster Management System at Sea - Focused on the SEWOL passenger ship case -

0

조회

0

다운로드

16

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Over a month has passed since the sinking of the SEWOL passenger ship, yet day by day the media is putting forward new analysis for cause of the tragedy. The violation of duty by the crew, inadequate initial response, the absence of a disaster management control tower, the suspicion of preferential treatment of certain private rescue service enterprises, poor standards of vessel inspections, non-compliance of ship operation regulations are just a few of the endless problems that have surfaced as the problem behind the SEWOL disaster. It can be said that through the SEWOL disaster, the present state of the ROK’s crisis management ability has clearly been exposed. At this point, it is crucial to examine disaster management law regarding maritime disasters caused by passenger vessels to prevent a repeat of an incident like the SEWOL disaster. On the other hand, it also holds importance as it calls for interest towards the otherwise neglected disaster management act. Generally, the disaster management system is categorized into the areas of prevention, preparation, response and recovery. When each stage of the disaster management system comes together organizationally and co-operatively, the objectives of disaster management can be reached. Following such divisions, the most crucial stage of disaster management is prevention. In the event of a disaster, there must be thorough preparation to respond in order to effectively protect the lives of the citizens. However, as preparation and response is commonly considered to be related to organization and activities, it is has aspects that prove to be difficult in applying the principles that are traditionally studied in the area of administrative law. For such reasons, the research undertaken in by the field of law has been focused on the safety system of police law’s risk prevention in the area of prevention. Thus, awareness of the neglect of research in disaster management act on the overall is necessary. In addition, there was a greater weakness in the study of maritime disaster management in comparison to general disaster management. The reason such can be related back to the nature of maritime disasters to be more closely linked to a number of international conventions of varying legal natures rather than domestic law. With this background, this paper analyzes the legal system and study of maritime disaster management system and presents the current legal systems problems and also gives a proposal for its improvement. The laws related to maritime disasters caused by passage vessels are 「Framework Act on The Management of Disasters And Safety」, 「Ship Safety Act」, 「Maritime Safety Act」, 「Rescue and Aid at Sea and in the River Act」, 「Seafarers Act」, and 「Marine Transport Act」. The various systems that are regulating these laws were divided by disaster management stages and analyzed to deduce the problems. In addition, this paper clarifies that disaster management is a duty of the nation state, and researches whether the duty of disaster management can be carried out with cooperatively with private organizations, and if so to what extent is private cooperation suitable.

Abstract

Over a month has passed since the sinking of the SEWOL passenger ship, yet day by day the media is putting forward new analysis for cause of the tragedy. The violation of duty by the crew, inadequate initial response, the absence of a disaster management control tower, the suspicion of preferential treatment of certain private rescue service enterprises, poor standards of vessel inspections, non-compliance of ship operation regulations are just a few of the endless problems that have surfaced as the problem behind the SEWOL disaster. It can be said that through the SEWOL disaster, the present state of the ROK’s crisis management ability has clearly been exposed. At this point, it is crucial to examine disaster management law regarding maritime disasters caused by passenger vessels to prevent a repeat of an incident like the SEWOL disaster. On the other hand, it also holds importance as it calls for interest towards the otherwise neglected disaster management act. Generally, the disaster management system is categorized into the areas of prevention, preparation, response and recovery. When each stage of the disaster management system comes together organizationally and co-operatively, the objectives of disaster management can be reached. Following such divisions, the most crucial stage of disaster management is prevention. In the event of a disaster, there must be thorough preparation to respond in order to effectively protect the lives of the citizens. However, as preparation and response is commonly considered to be related to organization and activities, it is has aspects that prove to be difficult in applying the principles that are traditionally studied in the area of administrative law. For such reasons, the research undertaken in by the field of law has been focused on the safety system of police law’s risk prevention in the area of prevention. Thus, awareness of the neglect of research in disaster management act on the overall is necessary. In addition, there was a greater weakness in the study of maritime disaster management in comparison to general disaster management. The reason such can be related back to the nature of maritime disasters to be more closely linked to a number of international conventions of varying legal natures rather than domestic law. With this background, this paper analyzes the legal system and study of maritime disaster management system and presents the current legal systems problems and also gives a proposal for its improvement. The laws related to maritime disasters caused by passage vessels are 「Framework Act on The Management of Disasters And Safety」, 「Ship Safety Act」, 「Maritime Safety Act」, 「Rescue and Aid at Sea and in the River Act」, 「Seafarers Act」, and 「Marine Transport Act」. The various systems that are regulating these laws were divided by disaster management stages and analyzed to deduce the problems. In addition, this paper clarifies that disaster management is a duty of the nation state, and researches whether the duty of disaster management can be carried out with cooperatively with private organizations, and if so to what extent is private cooperation suitable.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. 김선광, "자연재해법과 재난관리법의 통합에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 28(4), pp.143~164 (2011), 법학연구소
  2. 김종보, "헌법의 객관성과 국가의 기본권보호의무", 공법학연구, 11(4), pp.27~58 (2010), 한국비교공법학회
  3. 국가재해재난관리체계 구축방안, "김태윤", 한국행정연구원, ~ (2000)
  4. 김해룡, "방재역량 강화를 위한 PPP", 외법논집, 36(1), pp.1~16 (2012), 법학연구소
  5. 노진철, "국가 재난관리체제의 기능과 한계", 사회과학 담론과 정책, 2(1) (2009)
  6. 문현철, "방재행정법의 체계화에 관한 연구", 박사, 법학, pp.2001
  7. 문현철, "해양재난에 대한 국제행정법적 검토", 국가위기관리연구, 4(1) (2010)
  8. 이부하, "헌법영역에서 기본권보호의무", 공법학연구, 8(3), pp.123~140 (2007), 한국비교공법학회
  9. 조성제, "재난 및 안전관리와 관련한 법․제도 개선에 관한 연구", Crisisonomy, 6(2), pp.1~18 (2010), 위기관리 이론과 실천
  10. 최승필, "재난방지체계에 있어서 구조와 권한에 관한 법⋅제도적 검토 -우리나라와 독일의 재난관리체계를 중심으로-", 외법논집, 36(1), pp.17~35 (2012), 법학연구소
  11. 한수웅, "헌법학" (2013), 법문사
  12. 허완중, "기본적 인권을 확인하고 보장할 국가의 의무", 저스티스, (115), pp.68~105 (2010), 한국법학원
  13. Burgi, M., "Funktionale Privatisierung und Verwaltungshilfe" (1999)
  14. Denninger, E., "Präventions-Staat" (1988), KJ
  15. Eidenmüller, H., "Effizienz als Rechtsprinzip: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen der ökonomischen Analyse des Rechts" (1995)
  16. Gramm, Ch., "Privatisierung und notwendige Staatsaufgaben" (2001)
  17. Hoffmann-Riem, W., "Grundlagen desVerwaltungsrechts 1" (2006)
  18. Nordmann, H., "Integrierte Energie- und Klimapolitik: Die Sicherstellung der Erdgasversorgung" (2012)
  19. Schmidt-Aßmann, E., "Das allgemeine Verwaltungsrecht als Ordnungsidee:Grundlagen und Aufgaben der verwaltungsrechtlichen Systembildung" (2006)
  20. Stober, R., "Katastrophenverwaltungsrecht - Zur Renaissance eines vernachlässigten Rechtsgebietes", pp.121~ (2005), NVwZ
  21. Walus, A., "Katastrophennotstand in Berlin: Strukturen und Kompetenzkonflikte", pp.152~ (2010), LKV
  22. Weiß, W., "Privatisierung und Staatsaufgaben: Privatisierungsentscheidungen im Lichte einer grundrechtlichen Staatsaufgabenlehre unter dem Grundgesetz" (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)