야샤르 케말의 「빈보아신화(Binboğa Efsanesi)」에 나타난 노마디즘 연구
A Study on Nomadism of Yaşar Kemal through his Novel, “Binboğa Efsanesi”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, we review the nomadism of Turkish writer Yaşar Kemal through his novel, “Binboğa Efsanesi”. Namely that nomadism is not a way which looks only for central and transcendental values. It is a way to live with creation by asking things of life. This is the exact way to be a nomadic subject. Also, it is something possible to achieve through behavior, by “becoming”. Yaşar Kemal shows how the desire of the Turkmen nomads for deterritorialization was frustrated by a national apparatus. The deterritorialized desire of the nomads to escape from the nation or possessiveness clashes against a lifestyle of possessions and accumulated wealth. In his novel Kemal explains his nomadism by showing the conflicts between nomadic people and the nation. At a same time he represents the others, he speaks in the name of nomads who were excluded and oppressed in the modern period. This trial of his is a slice of the politics of formation. This novel shows that the creativity and voluntary expression of life as a nomadic subject will endure in spite of the national apparatus, and that deterritorialization can be a form of formation which will continue forever.
Abstract
In this article, we review the nomadism of Turkish writer Yaşar Kemal through his novel, “Binboğa Efsanesi”. Namely that nomadism is not a way which looks only for central and transcendental values. It is a way to live with creation by asking things of life. This is the exact way to be a nomadic subject. Also, it is something possible to achieve through behavior, by “becoming”. Yaşar Kemal shows how the desire of the Turkmen nomads for deterritorialization was frustrated by a national apparatus. The deterritorialized desire of the nomads to escape from the nation or possessiveness clashes against a lifestyle of possessions and accumulated wealth. In his novel Kemal explains his nomadism by showing the conflicts between nomadic people and the nation. At a same time he represents the others, he speaks in the name of nomads who were excluded and oppressed in the modern period. This trial of his is a slice of the politics of formation. This novel shows that the creativity and voluntary expression of life as a nomadic subject will endure in spite of the national apparatus, and that deterritorialization can be a form of formation which will continue forever.
참고문헌 (21)
- 김지영, "들뢰즈의 타자이론", 비평과 이론 (2004)
- 김진옥, "울프의 올란도: 들뢰즈", 가타리의 “여성되기, 2003, pp.9(2), ~
- 들뢰즈-가타리, "앙티외디푸스" (1994), 민음사
- 들뢰즈 질, "천개의 고원" (2001), 새물결
- 브라이도티 로지, "새로운 노마디즘을 향하여: 페미니즘의 들뢰즈적 궤적 혹은 형이상학과 신진대사", 문화과학, (15) (1998)
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈의 초월적 경험론과 칸트", 칸트연구 (2001), 한국칸트학회
- 서동욱, "들뢰즈와 레비나스에서 감성의 중요성―‘상처’의 경험에 관해서―", 철학과 현상학 연구, (20), pp.8~190 (2003), 한국현상학회
- 유재홍, "들뢰즈의 문학비평- 비인칭적 자아를 중심으로 -", 한국프랑스학논집, 41, pp.343~364 (2003), 한국프랑스학회
- 윤종범, "질 들뢰즈 연구", 어문학 연구 제 8집 (1999), 상명대학교 어문학연구소.
- 이진우, "욕망의 계보학-니체와 들뢰즈를 중심으로", 니체연구, (6), pp.117~148 (2004), 한국니체학회
- 장시기, "들뢰즈 가타리의 몸철학과 페미니즘의 미래", 영미어문학, (59) (2000)
- 최진석, "욕망과 혁명－늘 가타리에게 궁금했으나 감히 들뢰즈에게 물어보지 못한것", 문화과학, (39) (2004)
- 푸코 미쉘, "성의 역사 I" (1994), 나남 출판사
- 프로이트 지그문트, "토템과 타부", 종교의 기원 (2003), 열린책들
- Ciftlikci Ramazan, "Ya?ar Kemal: Yazar-Eser-Uslup" (1997), T.C. Bakanlı?ı,
- Deleuze Gilles, "Difference and Repetition, Trans. Patton Paul" (1994), Columbia UP
- Deleuze G, "Anti-Oedipus", 중동연구, 27(2) (1994), Univ. of Minnesota
- Deleuze G., "A Thousand Plateaus" (2003), Univ. of Minnesota
- Kang,Jin-Ho, "The Flow of Desire in Deleuze and Guattari, and Lawrence, The New Association of English language & Literature" (2003), No.26
- Kemal Ya?ar, "Binbo?a Efsanesi" (2001), Adam
- ?i?ek Slavoj, "Organs Without Bodies: Deleuze and Consequences" (2004), Routledge