본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

신남방정책 평가에 대한 참여자 인식분석: Q방법론을 중심으로

Exploring the perceptions of policy participants on the evaluation of the New Southern Policy: Q-methodology application and perspective

정광호|서민정
한국비교정부학회 (The Korean Association For Comparative Government)|2022.12|한국비교정부학보 (Korean Comparative Government Review)|제26권 제4호|pp. 59-90|DOI 10.18397/kcgr.2022.26.4.59

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Q 방법론정책평가Q Methodology정책실패Policy Failure신남방정책New Southern Policy정책기능주의Positive Policy FunctionalismCritical Policy Functionalism
주제분류행정학

초록

(Purpose) The New Southern Policy of Korea is a representative foreign policy that has been promoted since 2017. This study on the New Southern Policy leads to an in-depth analysis of how public officials participating in the policy process evaluate the policy. (Design/methodology/approach) In detail, the Q-method analysis was applied with 37 Q statements and 24 respondents from the government such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, and the Financial Services Commission. The Q statements of this study came from previous research and open resources on the New Southern Policy. (Findings) The results show three psychological evaluation frameworks: View 1 of a policy functionalist perspective with necessary useful policy, View 2 of a policy failure perspective with negative policy effects, and View 3 of a critical policy functionalist perspective with necessary but negative evaluation. (Research implications or Originality) In conclusion, this study suggests that the essence of the New Southern Policy is going to be kept in the upcoming Korean governments seeing that respondents recognize the effect and necessity of the policy. To upgrade the NSP in the future, it is useful to refer to View 3 and the common statements of this study: (1) to reflect the target countries’ perspectives, (2) to reorganize the implementation structure of the NSP, (3) to rebuild the policy from a comprehensive perspective in terms of foreign policy. Follow-up studies are expected in that (1) P sample can be varied, (2) actual policy recommendations should be presented, and (3) subjectivity of respondents can be taken into in research method. Follow-up studies will contribute to academic analysis of foreign and security policy in Korea.

Abstract

(Purpose) The New Southern Policy of Korea is a representative foreign policy that has been promoted since 2017. This study on the New Southern Policy leads to an in-depth analysis of how public officials participating in the policy process evaluate the policy. (Design/methodology/approach) In detail, the Q-method analysis was applied with 37 Q statements and 24 respondents from the government such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Industry, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of SMEs and Startups, and the Financial Services Commission. The Q statements of this study came from previous research and open resources on the New Southern Policy. (Findings) The results show three psychological evaluation frameworks: View 1 of a policy functionalist perspective with necessary useful policy, View 2 of a policy failure perspective with negative policy effects, and View 3 of a critical policy functionalist perspective with necessary but negative evaluation. (Research implications or Originality) In conclusion, this study suggests that the essence of the New Southern Policy is going to be kept in the upcoming Korean governments seeing that respondents recognize the effect and necessity of the policy. To upgrade the NSP in the future, it is useful to refer to View 3 and the common statements of this study: (1) to reflect the target countries’ perspectives, (2) to reorganize the implementation structure of the NSP, (3) to rebuild the policy from a comprehensive perspective in terms of foreign policy. Follow-up studies are expected in that (1) P sample can be varied, (2) actual policy recommendations should be presented, and (3) subjectivity of respondents can be taken into in research method. Follow-up studies will contribute to academic analysis of foreign and security policy in Korea.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. 안세현, "Anatomy of the Republic of Korea’s Niche Strategic Engagement in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS): ROK’s Tailor-Made Strategy and its Security Policy Implication", Journal of Policy Studies, 34(3), pp.97~121 (2019), 서울대학교행정대학원
  2. 안세현, "Genesis of the Russia-Japan Conundrum in Northeast Asian Security: The Anatomy of Mutual Distrust and the China Factor", Journal of Policy Studies, 36(1), pp.15~26 (2021), 서울대학교행정대학원
  3. Baek, Seung-gi, "Theories of Policy Sciences" (2010), Dae-Young Press
  4. Brown, S. R., "A primer on Q methodology", Operant Subjectivity, 16(3, pp.4) (1993), 91~138
  5. Brown, Steven R., "Q methodology in research on political decision making" (2019), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics
  6. Achievements and Challenges of Korea-ASEAN Economic Cooperation–Progress and Direction of New Southern Policy-, "Cho, Dae-Hyeon", POSCO Research Institution, ~ (2019)
  7. Changes in India's Foreign Policy and New Southern Policy in the U.S.-China Competition. Policy Research Series, "Cho, Won-Deuk.", Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, Korea National Diplomatic Academy, ~, pp.Korea National Diplomatic Academy, 2020-26 (2012)
  8. 최재덕, "미중패권경쟁의 전망과 한국의 외교전략-아세안과 신남방정책의 협력을 중심으로-", 슬라브학보, 35(2), pp.173~204 (2020), 한국슬라브․유라시아학회[DOI]
  9. New Southern Policy Plus: Key Areas and Direction of Implementation. Analysis of major international problems, Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, "Choi, Won-Gi", Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, Korea National Diplomatic Academy, ~, pp.Korea National Diplomatic Academy, 2020-42 (2020)
  10. Four-Year Evaluation of New Southern Policy: Diplomatic Achievements and Future Challenges. Analysis of major international problems, "Choi, Won-Gi.", Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security, Korea National Diplomatic Academy, ~, pp.Korea National Diplomatic Academy, 2021-34 (2021)
  11. 최영종, "인도태평양 시대 한국의 ‘신남방정책’과 새로운 지역주의 전략의 모색", 동북아연구, 34(1), pp.5~35 (2019), 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소[DOI]
  12. 최영출, "OECD 국가들의 ODA 효과성 영향 결합조건 분석: QCA분석 방법의 적용", 한국비교정부학보, 22(3), pp.1~20 (2018), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  13. 최영미, "중견국 외교로서의 신남방정책의 평가와 발전 방향: 한-아세안 관계를 중심으로", 21세기정치학회보, 31(4), pp.77~96 (2021), 21세기정치학회
  14. 은종환, "법조계 전관예우에 대한 인식유형의 탐색: Q-Methodology를 중심으로", 행정논총, 53(2), pp.237~268 (2015), 한국행정연구소
  15. 은종환, "북한 핵위협 및 그 대응 방안에 대한 인식유형 연구 - Q 방법론을 중심으로 -", Crisisonomy, 11(5), pp.95~118 (2015), (사)위기관리이론과실천
  16. Guzzini, Stefano, "Constructivism and international relations: Alexander Wendt and his critics" (2005), Routledge
  17. Sustainable New Southern Policy: Needs and Measures, "Han In-Taek", JPI, 208~213, pp.JPI Research Series, 43 (2018)
  18. Jeong, Jeong-gil, "Theories of Policy Sciences" (2014), Daemyung Press
  19. Jojin, John V., "India–South Korea relations under ‘Special strategic partnership’ : ‘Act east policy’ meets ‘New southern policy’", India Quarterly, 76(2), pp.207~225 (2020)
  20. 정광호, "정책실패의 연관 요인 탐색 -중앙일간지 사설의 내용분석을 중심으로 -", 한국거버넌스학회보, 16(1), pp.1~29 (2009), 한국거버넌스학회[DOI]
  21. 정광호, "탈북자지원정책의 새로운 이해 - 문제정의의 관점에서 -", 한국정책학회보, 19(1), pp.71~100 (2010), 한국정책학회
  22. Kim, Gyu-Yeon, "Proposal for the Promotion of New Southern Policy 2.0", Monthly Bulletin, Korea Development Bank, 770 (2020)
  23. 김학실, "효과적인 ODA 사업 추진을 위한 수원국 유형화와 정책적 연계", 한국비교정부학보, 21(2), pp.21~42 (2017), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  24. 김형종, "코로나19 감염병 사태와 신남방정책:아세안을 중심으로", 동남아시아연구, 30(3), pp.21~54 (2020), 한국동남아학회[DOI]
  25. 김일철, "PR 전문가들의 국가관계에 대한 인식 유형: 한‧일 관계를 중심으로 한 주관성 연구", 국제관계연구, 21(2), pp.171~219 (2016), 일민국제관계연구원[DOI]
  26. 김미연, "개성공업지구 갈등원인의 유형 분석", 통일연구, 24(2), pp.5~43 (2020), 통일연구원
  27. Kim, Soon Eun, "Q Methodology and Social Science" (2016), CMpress
  28. 김연수, "A Comparative Study of the Energy Policy Making of South Korea and Germany: with focused to Hermeneutic Methodology", 한국비교정부학보, 17(1), pp.95~124 (2013), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  29. La, Meeryung, "The ASEAN Community in the Post COVID-19 Era:Challenges and Policy Implications", KIEP Social Science Research Network, 21(4) (2021)
  30. 이창수, "인도와 한국의 GVC 무역의 특성과 신남방 정책 시사점", 국제통상연구, 25(4), pp.22~46 (2020), 한국국제통상학회[DOI]
  31. Lee, Geunyoung, "Stakeholder's Perception Analysis for 'Nuclear-Exit'Policy by using Q-methodology", Master, pp.2018
  32. "The Blue Houes announces five secretaries...Lee Jinseok to succeed Yoon Gunyoung" (2020)[URL]
  33. New Southern Policy of the Moon Jae In Administration: Diplomatic Diversification through ASEAN. Analysis of Security Issues, "Lee, Jae-Hyeon", RINSA, Korea National Defense University, 138~ (2017)
  34. Korea’s new southern policy: Motivations of ‘Peace Cooperation’ and implications for the Korean Peninsula, "Lee, Jaehyon", The Asian Institute for Policy Studies, 1~19 (2019)
  35. Search Korea-ASEAN Cooperation through New Southern Policy Plus, "Lee, Ji-Hyeok", The Export-Import Bank of Korea, Research Institute for Overseas Economy, ~ (2021)
  36. Evaluation of the New Southern Policy and Diretions for Improvement, "Lee, Kweon-Hyoung", National Research Council for economics, Humanities and Social Sciences, ~, pp.National Research Council for economics, Humanities and Social Sciences, 22-20-01 (2022)
  37. 이권호, "대만의 신남향정책과 한국의 신남방정책의 비교 연구", 중국지역연구, 8(4), pp.97~138 (2021), 중국지역학회[DOI]
  38. 임현정, "Policy Coordination in South Korea", Journal of Policy Studies, 34(1), pp.73~97 (2019), 서울대학교행정대학원
  39. New Southern Policy Special Committee, "New Southern Policy Plus Brochure" (2021), New Southern Policy Special Committee
  40. "New Southern Policy Special Committee officially launched..."The New Southern Policy is being promoted."" (2018)[URL]
  41. 박성빈, "미국과 일본의 탈중국 정책 이후 동남아시아국가연합(ASEAN)의 무역⋅투자: 신남방정책에 주는 함의", 미래성장연구, 7(2), pp.69~93 (2021), 미래성장연구원[DOI]
  42. 박상희, "Politics or Bureaucratic Failures? Understanding the Dynamics of Policy Failures in Democratic Governance", Journal of Policy Studies, 36(3), pp.25~36 (2021), 서울대학교행정대학원
  43. 박상욱, "개발도상국 국가혁신체제의 평가에 관한 비교연구: 메콩권역 5개국을 중심으로", 한국비교정부학보, 17(1), pp.1~22 (2013), 한국비교정부학회[DOI]
  44. Presidential Secretariat, "The Three-Year Journey of New Southern Policy – Prosperity for All, Accompanying for Peace" (2020), The Blue House
  45. Ratih, Indraswari, "South Korea’s ASEAN Policy Today: The New Southern Policy and Its Standing", Korea Europe Review: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Politics, Society, and Economics, 2, pp.121~134 (2022)
  46. 서승원, "한국과 일본의 대 아세안 안보정책 - 신남방정책과 자유롭고 개방된 인도･태평양 비전, 그리고 역외 중간국의 전략적 영향력 -", 비교일본학, 48, pp.57~80 (2020), 일본학국제비교연구소[DOI]
  47. Watts, Simon, "Doing Q Methodological Research:Theory, Method & Interpretation" (2014), Communication Books
  48. Wendt, A., "Social Theory of International Politics" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  49. 우양호, "동아시아 해역공동체를 향한 ‘신남방정책’의 의미와 평가", 인문사회과학연구, 20(2), pp.135~175 (2019), 인문사회과학연구소[DOI]
  50. Yoon, Seok-Jun, "US Free and Open Indo-Pacific(FOIP) Strategy and Korea's New Southern Policy", Spring Conference, 2019 The Korea Association for Policy Studies (2019)

관련 논문AI추천

South Korea’s New Southern Policy as Middle Power Diplomacy강민휘한국국방연구원 · The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis2022 · 제34권 제1호동아시아 해역공동체를 향한 ‘신남방정책’의 의미와 평가우양호인문사회과학연구소 · 인문사회과학연구2019 · 제20권 제2호위험분산을 위한 다층적 그룹핑 전략 : 문재인 정부 신남방 정책 구상의 전략적 배경과 이행방안김유철동아시아국제정치학회 · 국제정치연구2018 · 제21권 제1호한국의 새로운 對 아세안(ASEAN) 협력 전략: 중견국 외교를 통한 소다자주의적 접근김동엽한국아시아학회 · 아시아연구2022 · 제25권 제1호신남방정책의 이민정책적 고찰: 아세안을 중심으로조영희, 최경희국제지역연구원 · 아태연구2020 · 제27권 제3호인도태평양 시대 한국의 ‘신남방정책’과 새로운 지역주의 전략의 모색최영종사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소 · 동북아연구2019 · 제34권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

Cyclical Pattern of Expenditure Based on the Revenue Structure: Examining the Influence of Political Power in the United States김성찬pp. 1-18Toward a Representative Bureaucracy: The Case of Kenya권경득, Francis W. Otienopp. 19-40An Empirical Study on Interregional Perceptions of Regional Infrastructure in Life Satisfaction이동기pp. 41-5821세기 지방자치(행정)의 현대적 경향: 미국과 프랑스의 비교연구최진혁pp. 91-120한국과 일본의 은둔형 외톨이 은둔생활 비교 연구정근하, 노영희pp. 121-142
원문 보기