South Korea’s New Southern Policy as Middle Power Diplomacy
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study is designed to scrutinize South Korea’s New Southern Policy (NSP) as middle power diplomacy, which is a new foreign policy that the current Moon Jae-In administration has implemented in order to diversify its diplomacy towards Southeast Asia and India, so as to find out whether the NSP represents successful middle power diplomacy. To this end, the NSP was analyzed by the five characteristics of the foreign policy behavior of middle powers—multilateralism, coalition-building, good international citizenship, niche diplomacy and bridging— as the theoretical criteria of middle power diplomacy. From the analysis, the NSP fulfilled the five characteristics of middle power diplomacy, although there were found some limitations and challenges. Korea utilized multilateralism as a platform to promote the NSP; built coalitions to tackle regional and global challenges through cooperation; exerted good international citizenship by contributing to the common good and interests in the region; employed niche diplomacy in development cooperation in various areas; and played a bridge role by narrowing the development gap in the NSP region. Therefore, this study argues that the NSP represents successful middle power diplomacy and provides some suggestions for the NSP based upon the analysis and implications for Korea’s foreign policy as well as the NSP.
Abstract
This study is designed to scrutinize South Korea’s New Southern Policy (NSP) as middle power diplomacy, which is a new foreign policy that the current Moon Jae-In administration has implemented in order to diversify its diplomacy towards Southeast Asia and India, so as to find out whether the NSP represents successful middle power diplomacy. To this end, the NSP was analyzed by the five characteristics of the foreign policy behavior of middle powers—multilateralism, coalition-building, good international citizenship, niche diplomacy and bridging— as the theoretical criteria of middle power diplomacy. From the analysis, the NSP fulfilled the five characteristics of middle power diplomacy, although there were found some limitations and challenges. Korea utilized multilateralism as a platform to promote the NSP; built coalitions to tackle regional and global challenges through cooperation; exerted good international citizenship by contributing to the common good and interests in the region; employed niche diplomacy in development cooperation in various areas; and played a bridge role by narrowing the development gap in the NSP region. Therefore, this study argues that the NSP represents successful middle power diplomacy and provides some suggestions for the NSP based upon the analysis and implications for Korea’s foreign policy as well as the NSP.
참고문헌 (68)
- Jongryn Mo, "South Korea’s Middle Power Dipolmacy : A Case of Growing Compatibility between Regional and Global Roles", International Journal, 71(4), pp.587~607 (2016)
- Wongi Choe, "Achievements of the New Southern Policy and Diplomatic Challenges in the Future", Korea National Diplomatic Academy Policy Forum on Korea’s Foreign Policy Initiatives: New Southern and Northern Policy (2019)
- Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy, "New Southern Policy Plus: Hearts Together, Beat Forever", pp.14~ (2021), Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy
- Wongi Choe, "New Southern Policy’: Korea’s Newfound Ambition in Search of Strategic Autonomy", Asie.Visions, (118) (2021), The French Institute of International Relations
- Adam Chapnick, "The Middle Power", Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 7(2), pp.73~82 (1999)
- Laura Neack, "Searching for Middle Powers", Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics (2017), Oxford University Press[DOI]
- Carsten Holbraad, "The Role of Middle Powers", Cooperation and Conflict, 6(2), pp.77~90 (1971)
- Matthew Stephen, "The Concept and Role of Middle Powers during Global Rebalancing", Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 14(2), pp.36~52 (2013)
- Moch Faisal Karim, "Middle Power, Status-Seeking and Role Conceptions : The Cases of Indonesia and South Kroea", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 72(4), pp.343~363 (2018)
- Andrew Carr, "Is Australia a Middle Power? A Systemic Impact Approach", Australian Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), pp.70~84 (2014)
- Sarah Teo, "Toward a Differentiation–Based Framework for Middle Power Behavior", International Theory, pp.1~24 (2021)
- Sarah Teo, "Middle Power Identities of Australia and South Korea : Comparing the Kevin Rudd", Julia Gillard and Lee Myung-bak Administrations, 2018, pp.31(2), 221~239
- Taehwan Kim, "A Status Identity Approach to Middle Power Diplomacy : Comparing Public Diplomacy Cases of Australia, Turkey, and Indonesia", IFANSFOCUS, 7, pp.1~12 (2020)
- Andrew F. Cooper, "Relocating Middle Powers:Australia and Canada in a Changing World Order", pp.19~ (1993), Melbourne University Press
- Ralf Emmers, "Regional Security Strategies of Middle Powers in the Asia–Pacific", International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 15, pp.185~216 (2015)
- Teo, "Toward a Differentiation-Based Framework", 7~
- Chapnick, "The Middle Power", 75~76
- David A. Cooper, "Challenging Contemporary Notions of Middle Power Influence: Implications of the Proliferation Security Initiative for ‘Middle Power Theory", Foregin Policy Analysis, 7, pp.317~336 (2011)
- Eudard Jordaan, "The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations : Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers", Politikon, 30(1), pp.165~181 (2003)
- Robert O. Keohane, "Lilliputians’ Dilemmas : Small States in International Politics", International Organization, 23(2), pp.291~310 (1969)
- Charalampos Efstathopoulos, "Middle Powers and the Behavioural Model", Global Society, 32(1), pp.47~69 (2018)
- Teo, "Toward a Differentiation-Based Framework", 6~
- Robert W. Coz, "Middlepowermanship, Japan, and Future World Order", International Journal, 44(4), pp.823~862 (1989)
- Seonjou Kang, "Middle Power Diplomacy Strategy:Focusing on External Expansion of MIKTA", pp.8~9 (2014), The Institute of Foreign Affairs and National Security
- Carsten Holbraad, "Middle Powers in International Politics" (1984), Macmillan
- Andrew Cooper, "Middle Power Leadership and the Evolution of the G20", Global Summitry Journal, 1(1), pp.1~14 (2013)
- Colin I. Bradford, "Middle Power Korea:Contributions to the Global Agenda", pp.8~20 (2015), Council on Foreign Relations
- 이승주, "연합 형성과 중견국 외교: 믹타(MIKTA)의 사례", 국제.지역연구, 25(2), pp.91~116 (2016), 국제학연구소
- Randall L. Schweller, "The Korean Pivot: The Study of South Korea as a Global Power", pp.3~9 (2017), Center for Strategic and International Studies
- Myunggoo Kang, "Economic and Diplomatic Significance of the New Southern Policy", KDB Monthly, pp.64~75 (2018)
- Jaehyun Lee, "How Could the New Southern Policy Be Successful in ASEAN?", Isseu Brief, 24, pp.1~17 (2018)
- 최재덕, "신남방정책과 ‘인도-태평양 전략’의 상호연계 모색: 지정학과 지경학의 상호보완성을 중심으로", 세계지역연구논총, 37(4), pp.321~356 (2019), 한국세계지역학회[DOI]
- 최영종, "인도태평양 시대 한국의 ‘신남방정책’과 새로운 지역주의 전략의 모색", 동북아연구, 34(1), pp.5~35 (2019), 사회과학연구원 부설 동북아연구소[DOI]
- Balbina Y. Hwang, "Northeast Asian Perspectives on China’s Belt Road Initiative : The View from South Korea", East Asia, 36, pp.129~150 (2019)
- Eunhong Park, "New Southern Policy and Peace, Prosperity and Future on the Korean Peninsula: Achievements and Expectations from the Public Diplomacy Perspective", Korea National Diplomatic Academy Policy Forum on Korea’s Foreign Policy Initiatives:New Southern and Northern Policy (2019)
- Wongi Choe, "New Southern Policy Plus: Key Areas and Direction" (2020), Korea National Diplomatic Academy
- A Study on Promoting New Southern Policy through Analysis of China’s Environmental Cooperation with ASEAN, "Taekgoo Kang", Korea Intstitute for International Economic Policy, ~ (2020)
- Chiew-Ping Hoo, "What’s in the New Southern Policy Plus? An ASEAN Perspective on Building Niche–Based Pragmatic Cooperation with South Korea", World Economy Brief, 11(5), pp.1~5 (2021)
- Michael J. Green, "Is the Era of Korean Middle Power Diplomacy Over? A Realist Perspective", The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 31(1), pp.1~20 (2019), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy, "Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy : Policy Information", pp.4~ (2019), Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Diplomatic White Paper 2019", pp.99~ (2019), Minsitry of Foreign Affairs
- Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy, "New Southern Policy Promotion Strategy" (2018), Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy
- PCNSP, "“New Southern Policy”; and PCNSP", Presidential Committee, 17~
- PCNSP, "“New Southern Policy”; and PCNSP", Presidential Committee, 19~
- PCNSP, "New Southern Policy Plus", 14~
- Office of President of the Republic of Korea, "New Southern Policy, 3 Year Journey:Prosperity for All Joint March for Peace", pp.18~ (2020), Office of the President of the Republic of Korea
- Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy, "Statistics of Economy, Trade and Investment of New Southern Policy", pp.43~ (2021), Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy
- Office for Government Policy Coordination, "The 4 Year’s Achievements of 100National Tasks of Moon Jae-in Government", Office for Government Policy Coordination, 515~ (2021)
- OPROK, "New Southern Policy", 17~
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Diplomatic White Paper 2018", pp.78~ (2018), Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy, "New Southern Policy Plus: A Community for Peaple, Peace and Prosperity", pp.14~ (2021), Presidential Committee on New Southern Policy
- MOFA, "Diplomatic White Paper 2019", pp.251~253
- MOFA, "Diplomatic White Paper 2018", pp.80~82
- MOFA, "Diplomatic White Paper 2019", pp.104~
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Diplomatic White Paper 2020", pp.92~93 (2020), Ministry of Foreign Affairs
- Sarah Teo, "Southeast Asian Perspectives on South Korea’s Middle Power Engagement Initiatives", Asian Survey, 56(3), pp.555~580 (2016)
- 이지윤, "인도네시아의 기업의 사회적 책임활동에 대한 연구: 인도네시아 진출 한국기업을 중심으로", 글로벌경영학회지, 13(1), pp.311~335 (2016), 글로벌경영학회
- "Samsung C&T, Living Envrionment Improvement Project in Vietnam" (2018)[URL]
- PCNSP, "New Southern Policy Plus", 13~
- Fahmi Panimbang, "Labour Rights in High Tech Electronics: Case Studies of Workers’ Struggles in Samsung Electronics and its Asian Suppliers", pp.7~22 (2013), Asia Monitor Resource Centre
- Sustainability Report, "Samsung Electronics Sustainability Center", Samsung Electronics Sustainability Center, 52~ (2021)
- MOFA, "Diplomatic White Paper 2018", pp.188~
- MOFA, "Diplomatic White Paper 2019", pp.263~264
- MOFA, "Diplomatic White Paper 2020", pp.247~248
- Michael J. Green, "The Korean Pivot: The Study of South Korea as a Global Power", pp.17~34 (2017), Center for Strategic and International Studies
- "‘A Ban on Military Supplies Export to Myanmar’ Korea, Its First Independent Sanction" (2021)[URL]
- Brendan Howe, "Middle Power Korea: Contributions to the Global Agenda", pp.21~43 (2015), Council on Foreign Relations
- Sung-Mi Kim, "South Korea’s Middle Power Diplomacy: Changes and Challenges", pp.12~ (2016), Chatham House
