본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A “Self-determined” Failure of the Ethnically Fractionalised?: A Comparative Review of Self- Deterministic Peacebuilding Governance in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Myanmar

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정치외교학

초록

This paper critically examines the implementation of self-determination principled governance in the post-conflict contexts of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Myanmar. It delves into the complex and dynamic nexus of ethnically fractionalised states’ peacebuilding regimes, exploring whether the self-determination framework, often considered a cornerstone of post- conflict governance, has worked positively in achieving sustainable peace and reconciliation in these contexts. This paper evaluates key indicators of success or failure in peacebuilding regimes, such as minority rights. By utilising Dahl’s polyarchy and Habermas and Fraser’s participation parity framework on governance, this research evaluates the underlying discrepancies in the desired results of the application of self-determination principles. It offers an authentic matrix for analysing into the difficulties of self-determination-grounded peacebuilding, shedding light on the potential obstacles associated with self-determination. The findings of this study provide a basis for maturity-first peacebuilding governance, based on ethnic participation rather than conceptual ‘determination’ as an alternative to be considered in future peacebuilding.

Abstract

This paper critically examines the implementation of self-determination principled governance in the post-conflict contexts of Bosnia-Herzegovina and Myanmar. It delves into the complex and dynamic nexus of ethnically fractionalised states’ peacebuilding regimes, exploring whether the self-determination framework, often considered a cornerstone of post- conflict governance, has worked positively in achieving sustainable peace and reconciliation in these contexts. This paper evaluates key indicators of success or failure in peacebuilding regimes, such as minority rights. By utilising Dahl’s polyarchy and Habermas and Fraser’s participation parity framework on governance, this research evaluates the underlying discrepancies in the desired results of the application of self-determination principles. It offers an authentic matrix for analysing into the difficulties of self-determination-grounded peacebuilding, shedding light on the potential obstacles associated with self-determination. The findings of this study provide a basis for maturity-first peacebuilding governance, based on ethnic participation rather than conceptual ‘determination’ as an alternative to be considered in future peacebuilding.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Alesina, A., "Fractionalisation", Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), pp.155~194 (2003)
  2. Césaire, Aimé, "Discourse on Colonialism", pp.29~28 (1950), Monthly Review Press
  3. Chandler, David, "Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-building", pp.48~70 (2006), Pluto Press
  4. Crawford, J, "People’s Rights", pp.7~10 (2001), Oxford University Press
  5. Dahl, Robert Alan, "Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition" (1971), Yale University Press
  6. Diamond, Larry, "Promoting Democracy in Post-Conflict and Failed States", Foreign Affairs (2002)
  7. Doyle, Michael, "Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism", pp.201~280 (1997), Cambridge University Press
  8. Fearon, J. D., "Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war", American Political Science Review, 97(1), pp.75~90 (2003)
  9. Geertz, C, "The Interpretation of Cultures", pp.112~209 (1973), Basic Books
  10. Habyarimana, J., "Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?", American Political Science Review, 101(4), pp.709~725 (2007)
  11. Lamb, Alastair., "Asian Frontiers: Studies in a Continuing Problem", pp.148~ (1968), F.W. Cheshire
  12. Lederach, John Paul, "Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies", pp.87~97 (1997), USIP Press
  13. Levi-Strauss, C, "Tristes Tropiques" (1955), Librairie Plon
  14. Lintner, Bertil, "Why Burma’s Peace Efforts Have Failed to End Its Internal Wars", Peaceworks, (169) (2020), United States Institute of Peace
  15. Montalvo, J. G., "Ethnic diversity and economic development", Journal of Development Economics, 76(2), pp.293~323 (2005)
  16. Nakanishi, Yoshihiro, "Strong Soldiers, Failed Revolution: The State and Military in Burma, 1962-88" (2013), National University of Singapore Press, in association with Kyoto University Press
  17. Nkrumah, Kwame, "Africa Must Unite", pp.52~96 (1963), PANAF Books
  18. Oklopcic, Zoran, "Eight theses on Self-Determination: From Self-Determination of Peoples to Principles of Polity Formation?", 2nd ESIL Research Forum ‘The Power of International Law in Times of European Integration’, pp.28~29 (2007), European Society of International Law
  19. Paris, Roland, "At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  20. Perry, Peter John, "Myanmar (Burma) Since 1962: The Failure of Development" (2007), Ashgate
  21. Ratner, Steven R, "Drawing a Better Line: Uti Possidetis and the Borders of New States", The American Journal of International Law, 90(4), pp.590~624 (1996), Cambridge University Press
  22. Richmond, Oliver P, "Peace in International Relations" (2008), Routledge
  23. Smith, Jeremy, "The Bolsheviks and the National Question, 1917–23" (1996), Springer
  24. Schmidt, Fabian, "Rugova and the Kosovar power struggle", pp.1999, RFE
  25. Smith, A. D., "The Ethnic Origin of Nations", pp.15~187 (1990), Basil Blackwell
  26. Wilson, Woodrow, "Fourteen Points. Speech delivered in 1918", ~ (1918)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)