DRM(디지털권리관리)의 의의에 관한 일 고찰 － 저작물의 원활한 이용의 관점에서 －
Consideration on Meaning of Digital Rights Management
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Digital technology has facilitated illegal copies of copyrighted works by enabling users to access contents, illegally reproduce and disseminate it in unexpected ways. Such copying and dissemination are likely to be unlawful as a breach of copyright, but enforcement of those copyrights is extremely difficult in the digital environment. The digital technology makes content providers hesitate to make their contents available on the Internet. Thus, to secure their profits, the copyright owners have required supplementary measures, such as technological protection measures(TPM). The advent of TPM enables copyright owners to control users’ behavior, however, it precludes users from freely accessing works. Since access to authorized works has traditionally been in the “fair use domain” or “public domain”, users have believed such access is unlimited. But fair use as free use may be no more appropriate in the digital environment where there is a ready market or means to pay for the use. Accordingly, the alternative system is necessary to meet the interests of both right holders and users in the digital environment. DRM can be an alternative solution because users make lawful use of a work without prior authorization in easier ways and simultaneously rights owners make profits by securely providing users with their works online. Copyright law has traditionally allowed for licensing rights that enable pricing above marginal cost. Accordingly, when content providers use DRM, they should be careful to create a reasonable payment system. Also, copyright law seeks to provide society with reasonable access to an author’s work so that users may be exposed to the work and improve upon it. DRM may contribute to the principles of copyright law by facilitating better user access on the one hand and compensating fairly rights owners on the other.
Abstract
Digital technology has facilitated illegal copies of copyrighted works by enabling users to access contents, illegally reproduce and disseminate it in unexpected ways. Such copying and dissemination are likely to be unlawful as a breach of copyright, but enforcement of those copyrights is extremely difficult in the digital environment. The digital technology makes content providers hesitate to make their contents available on the Internet. Thus, to secure their profits, the copyright owners have required supplementary measures, such as technological protection measures(TPM). The advent of TPM enables copyright owners to control users’ behavior, however, it precludes users from freely accessing works. Since access to authorized works has traditionally been in the “fair use domain” or “public domain”, users have believed such access is unlimited. But fair use as free use may be no more appropriate in the digital environment where there is a ready market or means to pay for the use. Accordingly, the alternative system is necessary to meet the interests of both right holders and users in the digital environment. DRM can be an alternative solution because users make lawful use of a work without prior authorization in easier ways and simultaneously rights owners make profits by securely providing users with their works online. Copyright law has traditionally allowed for licensing rights that enable pricing above marginal cost. Accordingly, when content providers use DRM, they should be careful to create a reasonable payment system. Also, copyright law seeks to provide society with reasonable access to an author’s work so that users may be exposed to the work and improve upon it. DRM may contribute to the principles of copyright law by facilitating better user access on the one hand and compensating fairly rights owners on the other.
참고문헌 (40)
- 김경숙, "미국 저작권법상 인터넷송신을 위한 권리", 재산법연구, 25(1), pp.327~360 (2008), 한국재산법학회
- 김현철, "권리관리정보 보호를 위한 저작권법 개정 방향에 관한 연구", 저작권심의조정위원회, 저작권연구자료 37, ~ (2001)
- 백승흠, "DRM보호와 그 제한에 관한 소고", 인터넷법연구, 3(2) (2004)
- 송재도, "DRM(Digital Right Management)에 의한 디지털 컨텐츠 유통 및 가격정책에의 영향 분석", Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science(마케팅과학연구), 16(1), pp.1~11 (2006), 한국마케팅과학회
- 오병철, "디지털콘텐츠의 이용계약에 관한 법적 문제", 디지털재산법연구, 4(1) (2005)
- 오승종, "저작권법" (2008), 박영사
- 윤선희, "기술적 보호조치에 대한 검토", 디지털재산법연구, 1(2) (2002)
- 이대희, "디지털정보거래에서의 계약법과 저작권법의 관계", 국제거래법연구, 8 (1999)
- 이대희, "인터넷과 지적재산권법" (2002), 박영사
- 이병준, "假象市場의 規則인 인터넷경매이용약관의 編入과 그 規制", 法曹, 51(9)통권 : 552
- 이창렬, "DRM기술", 정보보호학회지, 12(1) (2000)
- 이철남, "DRM 기술과 법, 그리고 시장의 룰(Rule): DRM 보호범위의 확대와 강제적용의 문제점을 중심으로", 계간저작권, (가을)통권 : 79 (2007)
- 이충훈, "電子去來에서 約款의 編入과 免責約款에 관한 檢討", 法曹, 51(7)통권 : 550
- 전석진, "컴퓨터프로그램의 유통활성화를 위한 법적장치 : Shrinkwrap License을 중심으로", 정보법학, (3), pp.267~289 (1999)
- 조규곤, "DRM(Digital Right Management) 기술동향", 계간저작권, (53) (2001)
- 최상필, "DRM 시스템의 법적 보호와 그 한계", 비교사법, 13(3), pp.523~555 (2006), 한국비교사법학회
- 황찬현, "Shrinkwrap 계약", 인터넷법률, (3) (2000)
- Eberhard Becker, "Digital Rights Management: Technological, Economic, Legal and Political Aspects" (2008), Springer-Verlag
- Bechtold, Stefan, "Digital Rights Management in the United States and Europe", Am. J.Comp. L, 52, pp.323~ (2004)
- Bell, Tom W, "Fair Use vs. Fared Use: The Impact of Automated Rights Management on Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine", N.C.L. Rev, 76, pp.557~ (1998)
- Braucher, Jean, "The Failed Promise of the UCITA Mass-Market Concept and its Lessons for Policing of Standard Form Contracts", J. Small & Emerging Bus. L, 7, pp.393~ (2003)
- Ficsor, Mihály, "The Law of Copyright and the Internet" (2002), Oxford University Press
- Kerr, Ian R, "Technical Protection Measures: Tilting at Copyright’s Windmill", Ottawa L. Rev, 34, pp.7~ (2002)
- Kevin M. Lemley, "The Innovative Medium Defense: A Doctrine to Promote the Multiple Goals of Copyright in the Wake of Advancing Digital Technologies", Penn St. L. Rev, 110, pp.111~ (2005)
- Nathan Smith, "The Shrinkwrap Snafu: Untangling the "Extra Element" in Breach of Contract Claims Based on Shrinkwrap Licenses", B.Y.U.L. Rev, pp.1373~ (2003)
- Goldstein, Paul, "Copyright, Patent, Trademark and Related State Doctrines" (2002), Foundation Press
- Gordon, Wendy J, "Fair Use As Market Failure: A Structural and Economic Analysis of the Betamax Case and Its Predecessors", Colum.L.Rev, 82, pp.1600~ (1982)
- Hugenholtz, P. Bernt, "Copyright, Contract and Code: What Will Remain of the Public Domain", Brooklyn J. Int’l L, 26, pp.77~ (2000)
- Kenyon, Andrew T, "New Dimensionsin Privacy Law: International and Comparative Perspectives" (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Kerr, Ian R, "Alana Maurushat and Christian S. Tacit, “Technical Protection Measures: Tilting at Copyright’s Windmill”", Ottawa L.Rev, 34, pp.7~ (2002)
- Lemley, Kevin M, "The Innovative Medium Defense: A Doctrine to Promote the Multiple Goals of Copyright in the Wake of Advancing Digital Technologies", Penn St.L.Rev, 110, pp.111~ (2005)
- Lim, Daryl, "Copyright Under Siege: An Economic Analysis Of The Essential Facilities Doctrine and The Compulsory Licensing of Copyrighted Works", Alb.L.J.Sci.&Tech, 17, pp.481~ (2007)
- Loren, Lydia Pallas, "Redefining The Market Failure Approach to Fair Use in an Era of Copyright Permission Systems", J.Intel. Prop.L., 5, pp.1~ (1997)
- Moore, Christopher Paul, "Music Included on Software Downloaded from the Internet: Public Performance or Private Use?", Hastings Comm. & Ent. L. J, 21, pp.829~ (1999)
- Negroponte, Nicholas, "Being Digital" (1995), Random House
- Nimmer, Melville B, "Copyright: A Treatise on the Law of Literacy, Musical and Artistic Property and the Protection of Ideas" (2001), MatthewBender
- Roemer, Ryan, "Trusted Computing, Digital Rights Management, and the Fight for Copyright Control on Your Computer", UCLAJ.L.Tech, 8 (2003)
- Shah, Patrik A, "The Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act", BerkeleyTech.L.J, 15, pp.85~ (2000)
- "The U.S. WhitePaper", ~
- Weiser, Philip J, "The Internet, Innovation, and Intellectual Property Policy", Colum. L. Rev, 103, pp.534~ (2003)