본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

관성 및 다양성추구 상태의 비대칭성에 관한 연구 - 구간통합 다항로짓분석을 활용하여

The Study on the Asymmetry of Inertia and Variety-Seeking State - Using Section-Aggregated Multinomial Logit Analysis

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경영학

초록

Customer's purchase state consists of purchase inertia and variety-seeking. As the growing brand familiarity triggers the increase of brand attractiveness, customers purchase state will be of inertia. However the excessively growing brand familiarity ignites the decrease of brand attractiveness. Followingly the purchase state will be tend to plunge into the variety-seeking state. The main topic of this study is to validate the asymmetric formation of customer's purchase states between inertia and variety-seeking. In order to follow up the main topic, this article introduces a model to freely describe the velocity of value changes depending upon the purchase states. This model will help overcome the limitation of the past studies having been based on the symmetric value changes. Based on this approach marketer will be able to decide the timing of sales promotions. This research utilized local telecommunication carrier's database of smartphone application purchase/download records. This database was collected from two years (2009 and 2010) span, the time when the smartphones started commodifying in Korea whilst most of the past studies had used purchase data of maturity stage products. From this approach utilizing the introduction stage data in the product life cycle, the probability of brand choice depending upon the purchase state on the early-stage can be probed. Moreover, this study tries to expand the research methodology from the other areas of research by knowledge sharing. Here this study introduces the methodology of section-aggregated multinomial logit to simultaneously estimate the parameters that were included in the plural multinomial logit functions while the plural functions were inter-connected. This adoption of section-aggregated multinomial logit model procedures from the computerized statistics areas is expected to nourish the marketing research for more precise analysis and estimation of effects of marketing activities.

Abstract

Customer's purchase state consists of purchase inertia and variety-seeking. As the growing brand familiarity triggers the increase of brand attractiveness, customers purchase state will be of inertia. However the excessively growing brand familiarity ignites the decrease of brand attractiveness. Followingly the purchase state will be tend to plunge into the variety-seeking state. The main topic of this study is to validate the asymmetric formation of customer's purchase states between inertia and variety-seeking. In order to follow up the main topic, this article introduces a model to freely describe the velocity of value changes depending upon the purchase states. This model will help overcome the limitation of the past studies having been based on the symmetric value changes. Based on this approach marketer will be able to decide the timing of sales promotions. This research utilized local telecommunication carrier's database of smartphone application purchase/download records. This database was collected from two years (2009 and 2010) span, the time when the smartphones started commodifying in Korea whilst most of the past studies had used purchase data of maturity stage products. From this approach utilizing the introduction stage data in the product life cycle, the probability of brand choice depending upon the purchase state on the early-stage can be probed. Moreover, this study tries to expand the research methodology from the other areas of research by knowledge sharing. Here this study introduces the methodology of section-aggregated multinomial logit to simultaneously estimate the parameters that were included in the plural multinomial logit functions while the plural functions were inter-connected. This adoption of section-aggregated multinomial logit model procedures from the computerized statistics areas is expected to nourish the marketing research for more precise analysis and estimation of effects of marketing activities.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. 김동훈, "소비자의 다양성 추구 성향과 성향을 고려한 상표선택 모형", 마케팅연구, 14(4), pp.73~90 (1999)
  2. 안광호, "명품브랜드-자아 동일시가 브랜드 애착과 브랜드 몰입에 미치는 영향 - 조절초점의 조절효과 -", 아시아마케팅저널, 10(4), pp.1~33 (2009), 한국마케팅학회
  3. 우정, "소비자 가치 지식을 활용한 웰빙 신제품 개발에 관한 탐색적 연구", 지식경영연구, 9(3), pp.107~123 (2008), 한국지식경영학회
  4. 이승연, "스캐너 패널 데이터를 이용한 유통업체와 제조업체간의 고객확보 및 유지 전략에 관한 연구", 지식경영연구, 12(3), pp.73~96 (2011), 한국지식경영학회
  5. 정남호, "인터넷 쇼핑에이전트가 소비자 구매행위에 미치는 영향에 대한 이해:의사결정 프로세스의 관점에서", 지식경영연구, 10(3), pp.17~33 (2009), 한국지식경영학회
  6. 한상만, "소비자의 다양성추구성향에 따른 고려상표군형성에 관한 비교 연구", 마케팅연구, 12(1), pp.49~76 (1997)
  7. 한상만, "상표선택단계에서의 다양성추구자가 고려상표군 형성단계에서도 다양성추구소비자인가", 경영학연구, 29(1), pp.217~244 (2000)
  8. Bawa, K., "Modeling inertia and varietyseeking tendencies in brand choice behavior", Marketing Science, 9(3), pp.263~278 (1990)
  9. Berlyne, D. E., "Novelty, complexity, andhedonic value", Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5), pp.279~286 (1970)
  10. Brown, G.H, "Brand Loyalty-Fact orFiction", Advertising Age, 23(June 9, June 30,October 6, December 1), 24(January 25), ~ (1952)
  11. Chintagunta, P. K., "Inertia and varietyseeking in a model of brand-purchasingtiming", Marketing Science, 17(3), pp.253~270 (1998)
  12. Dube, J. -P., "State dependence and alternative explanationsfor consumer inertia", Journal of Economics, 41(3), pp.417~445 (2010)
  13. Faison, E. W. J., "The neglected varietydrive: A useful concept for consumer behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 4, pp.172~175 (1977)
  14. Givon, M. M., "Variety seeking throughbrand switching", Marketing Science, 3(1), pp.1~22 (1984)
  15. Guadagni, P.M, "A logitmodel of brand choice calibrated on scannerdata", Marketing Science, 2, pp.203~238 (1983)
  16. Howard, J. A., "The theoryof buyer behavior" (1969), John Wiley &Sons
  17. Jacoby, J., "Brandloyalty: Measurement and management" (1978), John Wiley & Sons, Inc
  18. Jeuland, A. P., "Brand choice inertia as oneaspect of the notion of brand loyalty", Management science, 25, pp.671~682 (1979)
  19. Kahn, B.E, "Effects ofretraction of price promotions on brand choicebehavior for variety-seeking andlast-purchase-loyal consumers", Journal ofMarketing Research, 27, pp.279~289 (1990)
  20. Kahn, B.E, "Effects of pricepromotions on variety-seeking andreinforcement behavior", Marketing Science, 10, pp.316~337 (1991)
  21. Kahn, B.E, "Measuring variety-seeking andreinforcement behaviors using panel data", Journal of Marketing Research, 23(2), pp.89~100 (1986)
  22. Kuehn, A. A., "Consumer brand choice asa learning process", Journal of AdvertisingResearch, 2(4), pp.10~17 (1962)
  23. Kuss, O, "A note onthe estimation of the multinomial logisticmodel with correlated responses in SAS", Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 87, pp.262~269 (2007)
  24. Lattin, J.M, "Using avariety-seeking model to identify substituteand complementary relationships amongcompeting products", Journal of MarketingResearch, 22(3), pp.330~339 (1985)
  25. Lee, D. -H., "Smart, social, slow, sell: FourKorean consumer trends for 2011", SERIQuarterly, 1, pp.2011~ (2011)
  26. Liu, X., "Predictinglongitudinal trajectories of health probabilitieswith random-effects multinomial logitregression", Statistics in Medicine, 31(29), pp.4087~4101 (2012)
  27. McAlister, L., "A dynamic attributesatiation model of variety-seeking behavior", Journal of Consumer Research, 9(2), pp.141~150 (1982)
  28. Menon, S., "The impact ofcontext on variety seeking in product choices", Journal of Consumer Research, 22(3), pp.285~295 (1995)
  29. Morrison, D. G., "Testing brand-switchingmodels", Journal of Marketing Research, 3(4), pp.401~409 (1966)
  30. Roger R. D., "Commentary on 'Theneglected variety drive,'", Journal of ConsumerResearch, 6, pp.88~91 (1979)
  31. Seetharaman, P.B, "Amodel of inertia and variety-seeking withmarketing variables", International Journal ofResearch in Marketing, 15, pp.1~17 (1998)
  32. Shin, S., "Disentangling preferences and learning inbrand choice models", Marketing Science, 31(1), pp.115~137 (2012)
  33. Shugan, S., "The cost of thinking", Journalof Consumer Research, 7, pp.99~111 (1980)
  34. Train, K., "Discrete choice methods withsimulation" (2003), Cambridge University Press
  35. Trivedi, M., "Amodel of stochastic variety-seeking", MarketingScience, 13(3), pp.274~297 (1994)
  36. Van Trijp, H. C. M., "Why switch? Product category-levelexplanations for true variety-seeking behavior", Journal of Marketing Research, 33(3), pp.281~292 (1996)
  37. Venkatesan, M., "Cognitive consistencyand novelty seeking, in Consumer Behavior:Theoretical Sources", pp.354~384 (1973), Prentice Hall
  38. Wang, S., "Aself-consistency approach to multinomial logitmodel with random effects", Journal of StatisticalPlanning and Inference, 140(7), pp.1939~1947 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)