본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

트럼프 2기 행정부 행정명령에 대한 입법 공동발의 분석: 공화당 계파를 중심으로

An Analysis of Legislative Co-sponsorship Responding to Executive Orders of the Second Trump Administration: Focusing on Republican Factions

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

In the first 100 days of his second term, President Trump issued 143 executive orders, signaling a rapid and sweeping policy shift. In response, Republican members of the House introduced a substantial number of bills aimed at codifying the content of the executive orders. This paper categorizes President Trump's major executive orders and analyzes the co-sponsorship patterns of corresponding bills, thereby examining how different factions within the Republican Party responded legislatively. The findings reveal distinct factional alignments: Freedom Caucus led efforts on federal downsizing and international aid cuts, and supported strict border control measures. In contrast, crime-related immigration bills were driven by the centrist Republican Main Street Partnership, while Republican Study Committee championed legislation addressing cultural issues such as abortion and gender. Unlike other areas, energy deregulation saw co-sponsorship patterns shaped less by ideological factions than by the economic composition of individual congressional districts.

Abstract

In the first 100 days of his second term, President Trump issued 143 executive orders, signaling a rapid and sweeping policy shift. In response, Republican members of the House introduced a substantial number of bills aimed at codifying the content of the executive orders. This paper categorizes President Trump's major executive orders and analyzes the co-sponsorship patterns of corresponding bills, thereby examining how different factions within the Republican Party responded legislatively. The findings reveal distinct factional alignments: Freedom Caucus led efforts on federal downsizing and international aid cuts, and supported strict border control measures. In contrast, crime-related immigration bills were driven by the centrist Republican Main Street Partnership, while Republican Study Committee championed legislation addressing cultural issues such as abortion and gender. Unlike other areas, energy deregulation saw co-sponsorship patterns shaped less by ideological factions than by the economic composition of individual congressional districts.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)