본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparative analysis of shear bond strength and quality of interface at novel bioactive material or Biodentine

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재료공학

초록

The quality and durability of the adhesion between calcium-silicate cements and the restorative material are important, bothfor the durability of the healing and the clinical success outcome. The aim is to analyze the shear bond strength and qualityof the interface between composite restorative material and new bioactive material and Biodentine at the same conditions. Theused pulp-capping materials: conventional Biodentine and the new hybrid biomaterial BioCal-Cap. In this study, only one typeof adhesive system and one resin-based composite have been used. For this purpose, 60 molds were prepared and divided intofour groups. Half of them were filled with Biodentine and the other 30 with BioCal-Cap. The shear bond strength betweencalcium-silicate cements and the composite material was investigated. The Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon Signed RanksTest were used for statistical analysis of the results. The results of the analyses show a statistically significant difference in shearbond strength between the two groups (p<0.05). In all selected specimens with Biodentine, upon immediate restoration withcomposite material, cracks of different lengths and sizes were observed in the pulp capping material. Fewer cracks wererecorded in the samples with delayed restoration using composite material. The data clearly show that the time of thecomposite material placement does not affect the shear bond strength in each of the observed groups. In selected specimenswith Biodentine, upon immediate restoration with composite material, cracks of different lengths and sizes were observed inthe pulp capping material. Fewer cracks were recorded in the samples with delayed restoration using composite material.

Abstract

The quality and durability of the adhesion between calcium-silicate cements and the restorative material are important, bothfor the durability of the healing and the clinical success outcome. The aim is to analyze the shear bond strength and qualityof the interface between composite restorative material and new bioactive material and Biodentine at the same conditions. Theused pulp-capping materials: conventional Biodentine and the new hybrid biomaterial BioCal-Cap. In this study, only one typeof adhesive system and one resin-based composite have been used. For this purpose, 60 molds were prepared and divided intofour groups. Half of them were filled with Biodentine and the other 30 with BioCal-Cap. The shear bond strength betweencalcium-silicate cements and the composite material was investigated. The Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon Signed RanksTest were used for statistical analysis of the results. The results of the analyses show a statistically significant difference in shearbond strength between the two groups (p<0.05). In all selected specimens with Biodentine, upon immediate restoration withcomposite material, cracks of different lengths and sizes were observed in the pulp capping material. Fewer cracks wererecorded in the samples with delayed restoration using composite material. The data clearly show that the time of thecomposite material placement does not affect the shear bond strength in each of the observed groups. In selected specimenswith Biodentine, upon immediate restoration with composite material, cracks of different lengths and sizes were observed inthe pulp capping material. Fewer cracks were recorded in the samples with delayed restoration using composite material.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. T. Dammaschke, , J. Hist. Dent, 56(1), pp.9~23 (2008)
  2. K. Cantekin, , J. Appl. Oral. Sci, 22(4), pp.302~306 (2014)
  3. L. Bjorndal, , Int. Endod. J, 52, pp.949~973 (2019)
  4. A. Nowicka, , Int. Endod. J, 41(8), pp.1234~1240 (2015)
  5. M. Ulmansky, , J. Oral. Pathol, 1(5), pp.244~248 (1972)
  6. J. Muruganandhan, , Appl. Sci, 11(7), pp.3045~ (2021)
  7. E. Nie, , Mater, 14(22), pp.6811~ (2021)
  8. M. Parirokh, , Int. Endod. J, 51, pp.177~205 (2018)
  9. L. Jagadish, , IOSR J. Dent. Med. Sci, 18(12), pp.68~72 (2019)
  10. N. Agrawal, , J. Nepal. Assoc. Pediatr. Dent, 3(1), pp.14~19 (2022)
  11. L. Argueta-Figueroa, , Biomimetics, 7(4), pp.211~ (2022)
  12. F. Shafiei, , Int. Endod. J, 52, pp.530~539 (2019)
  13. "Harvard, Germany", ~
  14. C. Rocha, "Modern Operative Dentistry" (2020), Springer International Publishing
  15. P. Bawa, , World J. Pharm. Res, 9(13), pp.652~658 (2020)
  16. N. Chaipattanawan, , CM Dent J, 42(2), pp.44~58 (2021)
  17. S. S. Oskoee, , J. Contemp. Dent. Pract, 12(6), pp.457~462 (2011)
  18. "Septodont, Saint-Maur des Fosses, France", ~
  19. D. F. Hashem, , Dent. Mater, 30(3), pp.343~349 (2014)
  20. P. J. Palma, , Clin Oral Investig, 25, pp.3131~3139 (2021)
  21. J. Camilleri, , Clin Oral Invest, 18, pp.1437~1446 (2014)
  22. J. Wang, , J. Ceram. Process. Res, 2(1), pp.27~30 (2001)
  23. A. Schmidt, , J. Adhes. Dent, 19(2), pp.129~135 (2017)
  24. L. Pintado, , J. Conserv. Dent, 21(1), pp.74~79 (2018)
  25. C. S. Farah, , Aust. Dent. J, 43(2), pp.81~86 (1998)
  26. M. A. Al-Sarheed, , J. Contemp. Dent. Pract, 17(2), pp.9~16 (2006)
  27. M. Salil, , Dent. J. Adv. Stud, 8, pp.49~54 (2020)
  28. M. E. Odabaş, , Sci. World J, 62(6), pp.61~65 (2013)
  29. A. Kudva, , J. Conserv. Dent, 25(1), pp.54~57 (2022)
  30. D. F. Hashem, , Dent. Mater, 30(3), pp.343~349 (2014)
  31. J. H. Shin, , Int. Endod. J, 40, pp.1210~1216 (2014)
  32. K. Cantekin, , J. Clin. Pediatr. Dent, 39, pp.143~148 (2015)
  33. H. Zhou, , Int. Endod. J, 39(4), pp.478~483 (2013)
  34. V. Carretero, , Coatings, 9(12), pp.783~ (2019)
  35. G. S. Meenu, , Endodontology, 32(1), pp.14~19 (2020)
  36. V. L. Deepa, , J. Conserv. Dent, 19(2), pp.166~170 (2016)
  37. S. Sismanoglu, , J. Adhesion Sci. Technol, 36, pp.1833~1846 (2022)
  38. 정화경, "Tricalcium Silicate-Based 치수복조재에 대한 수 종 수복재의 전단결합강도 비교", 대한소아치과학회지, 44(2), pp.200~209 (2017), 대한소아치과학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Interface between calcium silicate cement and adhesive systems according to adhesive families and cement maturationColon Pierre, Grosgogeat Brigitte, Mocquot Caroline, Pradelle-Plasse Nelly, Semennikova Katherine대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2021 · 제46권 제1호Comparative evaluation of the bond strength of self-adhering and bulk-fill flowable composites to MTA Plus, Dycal, Biodentine, and TheraCal: an in vitro studyAakrati Raina, Asheesh Sawhny, Saurav Paul, Sridevi Nandamuri대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2020 · 제45권 제1호Shear Bond Strength Comparison of Different Adhesive Systems to Calcium Silicate-based Materials김광철, 김미선, 남옥형, 신현옥, 이효설, 최성철대한소아치과학회 · 대한소아치과학회지2018 · 제45권 제4호Comparison of Shear Bond Strength in Novel Calcium Silicate-Based Materials to Composite Resin김영재, 김정욱, 김현태, 송지수, 신원규, 신터전, 장기택, 현홍근대한소아치과학회 · 대한소아치과학회지2023 · 제50권 제4호Tricalcium Silicate-Based 치수복조재에 대한 수 종 수복재의 전단결합강도 비교이난영, 이상호, 정화경대한소아치과학회 · 대한소아치과학회지2017 · 제44권 제2호Comparative analysis of bond strength to root dentin and compression of bioceramic cements used in regenerative endodontic proceduresAlencar Ana Helena Gonçalves de, Bruno Kely Firmino, Decurcio Daniel de Almeida, Estrela Carlos, Rodrigues Maykely Naara Morais, Silva Julyana Dumas Santos, Siqueira Patrícia Correia de대한치과보존학회 · Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics2021 · 제46권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (24건)