본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

요르단 경제 개혁의 성과 분석 -공적분과 벡터오차수정모형 검정-

An Analysis on the Outcomes of Economic Reform in Jordan -Cointegration and VECM test-

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Since the end of 1980s, Jordan has passed several phases of economic reform aimed at stabilizing the Jordanian economy and managing the transition from a state-controlled economic model to a market-led one. This study tries to assess the outcomes of economic reform. To do it, this paper analyzes the relationship between economic growth and several macroeconomic variables which are considered to be affected by the economic reform. The empirical analysis is carried out using the data for GDP, consumption expenditure,investment, government expenditure, export, FDI, official aid and workers’remittance. Cointegration analysis and VECM estimation find that in Jordan only overseas inflows of fund have led GDP, whereas domestic variables haven’t caused significant changes of GDP. This means that economic reform of Jordan has succeeded only in overseas sectors. The reform process in Jordan has been so slow, incomprehensive, and uncoordinated that it couldn’t find long-lasting solutions to major social and economic challenges of Jordan, such as poverty, unemployment, public debt, and high dependency on foreign aid. The critical point to driving the reform agenda forward is to deal with fundamental factors that determine their outcomes. The major reason for the failure to deal with key social and economic difficulties lies in the convergence of political and governance issues that undermine the reform efforts. Jordan needs to try to improve the governance framework, which means the progress of public sector performance, public sector accountability, and institutional capacity building. Jordan also has to make progress in political reform, which means enhancement of democracy in political and social life of the population.

Abstract

Since the end of 1980s, Jordan has passed several phases of economic reform aimed at stabilizing the Jordanian economy and managing the transition from a state-controlled economic model to a market-led one. This study tries to assess the outcomes of economic reform. To do it, this paper analyzes the relationship between economic growth and several macroeconomic variables which are considered to be affected by the economic reform. The empirical analysis is carried out using the data for GDP, consumption expenditure,investment, government expenditure, export, FDI, official aid and workers’remittance. Cointegration analysis and VECM estimation find that in Jordan only overseas inflows of fund have led GDP, whereas domestic variables haven’t caused significant changes of GDP. This means that economic reform of Jordan has succeeded only in overseas sectors. The reform process in Jordan has been so slow, incomprehensive, and uncoordinated that it couldn’t find long-lasting solutions to major social and economic challenges of Jordan, such as poverty, unemployment, public debt, and high dependency on foreign aid. The critical point to driving the reform agenda forward is to deal with fundamental factors that determine their outcomes. The major reason for the failure to deal with key social and economic difficulties lies in the convergence of political and governance issues that undermine the reform efforts. Jordan needs to try to improve the governance framework, which means the progress of public sector performance, public sector accountability, and institutional capacity building. Jordan also has to make progress in political reform, which means enhancement of democracy in political and social life of the population.

참고문헌 (14)

  1. 성공스토리: 최근 요르단의 경제성장 원동력 분석, 개도국 산업 분석 리포트, "박대원", 한국수출입은행 해외경제연구소, ~ (2010)
  2. Rethinking economic reform in Jordan: confronting socioeconomic realities, Carnegie Papers, "Alissa, Sufyan", Carnegie Middle East Center, ~ (2007)
  3. Doan, P. L., "Dilemmas of top-down decentralization in Jordan: the case of the Petra, Regional Planning Council", Third World Planning Review, 23(3), pp.273~288 (2001)
  4. Jordan Country Report, "Freedom House", Freedom in the World, ~ (2006)
  5. The Arab World Competitiveness Report 2007, "Hanouz, Margareta Drzeniek", World Economic Forum, ~ (2007)
  6. Hunaidi, Rima khalaf, "Reforms in Hindsight: Promises and Illusions, In Development Challenges in the 1990s: Leading Policy-Makers Speak from Experience" (2005), World Bank
  7. Evaluation Report: IMF Support to Jordan, 1989-2004, "Independent Evaluation Office", IMF, ~ (2004)
  8. Johansen, S., "Statistical and hypothesis testing of cointegration vector", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp.231~254 (1988)
  9. Johansen, S., "Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to the demand for money", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 52, pp.169~210 (1990)
  10. Saif, Ibrahim, "Changing the rules of the game: understanding the reform process in Jordan" (2005), Global Development Network
  11. "World DataBank"[URL]
  12. Trade Policy Review: Report by Jordan, "World Trade Organization", ~, pp.WT (2008), TPR[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)