Happy와 sad의 의미역 할당
On semantic role assignments of happy and sad.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the similarities and differences in semantic role assignments of emotion adjectives happy and sad to their arguments, with focus on their occurrence in anticipatory-it constructions. It claims, based on a corpus-based quantitative and qualitative analysis, that even though both happy and sad assign an experiencer role to their animate subject, they differ in assigning a causer role to their inanimate subject: in predicative position, sad is able to assign a causer role to their inanimate subject argument, while happy is not. This difference explains why anticipatory it+sad constructions are acceptable and anticipatory it+happy constructions are not. It also shows that anticipatory-it+sad constructions are used more frequently than SPEAKER-sad constructions in American English, while they are used in similar frequency in British English.
Abstract
This paper discusses the similarities and differences in semantic role assignments of emotion adjectives happy and sad to their arguments, with focus on their occurrence in anticipatory-it constructions. It claims, based on a corpus-based quantitative and qualitative analysis, that even though both happy and sad assign an experiencer role to their animate subject, they differ in assigning a causer role to their inanimate subject: in predicative position, sad is able to assign a causer role to their inanimate subject argument, while happy is not. This difference explains why anticipatory it+sad constructions are acceptable and anticipatory it+happy constructions are not. It also shows that anticipatory-it+sad constructions are used more frequently than SPEAKER-sad constructions in American English, while they are used in similar frequency in British English.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김효신, "한국어 상 보조용언 ‘가다’와 ‘오다’의 문법화 연구: 문법화 정도를 중심으로", 담화와 인지, 25(4), pp.31~53 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- 안미경, "Language Contact and Grammaticalization: A Case of English Concessive Prepositions", 담화와 인지, 25(4), pp.77~94 (2018), 담화·인지언어학회[DOI]
- Biber, Douglas, "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
- Carter, Ronald, "English grammar today book with workbook: An A–Z of spoken and written grammar" (2016), Cambridge University Press
- Croft, William, "Cognitive linguistics" (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Curme, George O., "English grammar" (1973), Barnes & Noble
- "British national corpus" (2004)[URL]
- "The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA)" (2008)[URL]
- "The corpus of historical American English (COHA)" (2010)[URL]
- Downing, Angella, "A university course in English grammar" (1992), Routledge
- Dowty, David, "Thematic proto-roles and argument selection", Language, 67(3), pp.547~619 (1991)
- Emonds, Joseph, "Root and structure preserving transformations", PhD, pp.1970
- Fillmore, Charles J, "Universals in linguistic theory", pp.1~88 (1968), Holt, Rinehart, and Winston
- Fillmore, Charles J, "Linguistics in the Morning Calm", pp.111~137 (1982), Hanshin Publishing Co
- Fillmore, Charles J, "Frame semantics for text understanding", Proceedings of NAACL 2001, wordNet and other lexical resources workshop, International Computer Science Institute (2001)
- Huddleston, Rodney, "The Cambridge grammar of the English language" (2002), Cambridge University Press
- Jespersen, Otto, "Essentials of English grammar" (1933), Holt, Rinehart and Winston
- Jespersen, Otto, "A modern English grammar on historical principles" (1949), G. Allen and Unwin Ltd
- Kruisinga, Etsko, "A handbook of present-day English, part II" (1932), P. Noordhoff
- Onions, Charles T., "Modern English syntax" (1971), Paul Keegan
- Quirk, Randolph, "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" (1985), Longman
- Talmy, Leonard, "Language typology and syntactic description, vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon", pp.57~14 (1985), Cambridge University Press
- Zandvoort, Reinard W., "A handbook of English grammar" (1962), Longman
- Zymmet, Jesse, "Learning a frequency-matching grammar together with lexical idiosyncracy: MaxEnt versus hierarchical regression", Proceedings of the 2018Annual Meeting on Phonology (2019), Linguistic Society of America