17세기 童蒙敎育 담당 敎官職制 硏究
The Organization of Instructors Responsible for Juvenile Education in the Joseon Dynasty during the 17th Century
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 논문은 17세기 동몽교육정책의 추이와 서울의 동몽교육 담당교관인 동몽교관, 사교관, 분교관의 지위와 자격, 교육활동을 정리해 본 것이다. 17세기 동몽교육정책은 크게 두가지 방향으로 진행되었다. 그 하나는 童蒙禮講과 교관의 襃貶을 연계시켜 교관의 교육활동의 내실을 기하는 것이었고, 또 하나는 동몽 교육의 범위를 도성 내의 전범위로 확대시키는 것이었다. 童蒙敎官은 임기만료 후 6품직으로 승천할 수 있었던 실교관으로, 선조대에 마련되어 조선말까지 지속된 교관이었다. 이에 비해, 私敎官은 서울에서 사사로이 동몽들을 가르치는 훈장들 중 교육의 실효가 있는 자를 치하하고 교육을 더욱 권장하기 위해 체아록과 함께 내려진 직명이었다. 사교관은 명예직에 가까웠으며 여기에는 入仕의 의미는 없었다. 이와는 달리, 인조대에 신설된 童蒙分敎官은 장권의 기능뿐만 아니라 입사의 기능도 가지고 있었다. 분교관은, 임기가 아니라 동몽예강의 결과와 평소 교육활동의 성취에 따라 동몽교관이나 여타의 실관으로 승진할 수 있었다. 하지만 바로 그 입사의 기능이 분교관제의 정상적 운영을 가로막았고, 원래 의도했던 실효를 보기 어려워지자 효종대에 동몽교관을 4원 증원하여 분교관을 대체하였다. 따라서 관제의 지속성이나 직급의 고하 등을 고려해볼 때, 조선후기 서울지역 동몽을 위한 교육정책의 중심은 동몽교관이었으며, 사교관과 동몽분교관은 이를 보완하여 동몽교육을 진흥하기 위해 설행되었던 제도였다고 하겠다. 본 논문의 연구 결과를 기초로 하여 조선시대 동몽교관직제의 실제를 보다 심도있게 이해하기 위해서는, 조선전기 동몽교관직의 지위와 성격을 규명하고 전후기를 비교검토할 필요가 있다. 또한 조선의 교육에서 차지하는 동몽교육의 위상을 밝히기 위해서는, 동몽담당 교관들과 四學의 교수들이나 書堂의 훈장들과의 관계 문제도 보다 면밀히 검토되어야 할 것이다.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to discuss and examine the historical trends of Juvenile education policies in the Joseon Dynasty during the 17th century, and give an overview about positions, qualification and educational activities of Juvenile education instructors, private school instructors and branch school instructors who were all responsible for Juvenile education in Hanseong (former name of Seoul city). The educational policies for Juvenileren in the 17th century were implemented broadly to two orientations: One way was to ensure substantiality of educational activities led by instructors by connecting the praise and censure of instructors with the principal guidance on Juvenile education (Dongmong Yegang, 童蒙禮講). The other way was to expand the scope of Juvenile education into whole areas of Hanseong as capital city. Jvenile education instructor(童蒙敎官) was a salaried occupation of public instructor who could be promoted to occupations of the 6th Class after its term of service was completed. It was subject to such an organization of instructors as implemented from the age of King Seonjo till the late age of Joseon Dynasty. On the other hand, private school instructor(私敎官) was a salaried occupation that could earn benefit called Chaearok. Originally, it aimed to further encourage educations and appreciate some private instructors who taught Juvenileren in Hanseong for their actual merit of education. Private school instructor came near to honorary office and had no meaning of any opportunity to hold a public office. Branch school instructor for Juvenileren(童蒙分敎官) was newly established in the age of King Injo. It had functional capacity of educational encouragement as well as opportunities to take up a public office. Branch school instructors could be promoted to Juvenile instructor or other public instructor according to their actual scores under principal guidance on Juvenile education as well as their achievements in usual educational activity, not according to their term of service. However, the functional aspect of branch school instructor, i.e. holding a public office, became an obstacle to well operating the organization of branch school instructors. It hardly brought desired effects in practice, so the organization of Juvenile education instructor became extended into 4 classes in the King Hyojong to replace existing organization of branch school instructor. In regard to organizational continuance and occupational class, it was found that Juvenile education instructors played a key role in educational policies for Juvenileren in capital city during the late age of Joseon Dynasty, whereas private school instructors and branch school instructors for Juvenileren were complementary instruction system implemented to promote Juvenile education. In order to make further comprehension about the reality of Juvenile instructor organization during the age of Joseon Dynasty on the basis of findings of this study, it is necessary to examine the actual position and nature of Juvenile instructors in the early age of Joseon Dynasty in comparison with those in the late age of Joseon Dynasty. Furthermore, it is also required to make closer examination of possible relationships among Juvenile education instructors, private school instructors and village school teachers, so that it will possibly able to make clear the position of Juvenile instruction in the education system of Joseon Dynasty.
참고문헌 (7)
- "朝鮮王朝實錄", ~
- "承政院日記", ~
- "備邊司謄錄", ~
- "童蒙禮講謄錄", ~
- "課試謄錄", ~
- "政錄", ~
- 최광만, "17세기 地方敎育政策의 性格 -『課試謄錄』을 중심으로", 교육사학연구, 18(1), pp.107~135 (2008), 교육사학회
