日韓リメイクドラマに現れる禁止表現 －機能と親疎上下関係からの一考察－
Prohibited Expressions in Japanese-Korean Remake Dramas -Considerations from the Function, Social Distance and Hierarchical Relationship-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in expressions between languages, focusing on the prohibited expressions of Japanese and Korean that appear in Japanese-Korean remake dramas. For this purpose, consider the form of expression from the function of prohibition and the social distance and hierarchical relationship. Brown & Levinson (1987) described the directive expression as face- threatening acts (FTA). Among them, prohibited expressions restrict the behavior of the hearer, so sufficient attention should be paid to speech. In this study, the functions of prohibition were divided into three categories based on the state of realization of prohibited acts. Social distance was divided into two categories based on the Japanese terms “uchi”, “soto” and “yoso” and the Korean terms “uri” and “nam”. Hierarchical relationship was divided into three categories based on social roles and age differences.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the differences in expressions between languages, focusing on the prohibited expressions of Japanese and Korean that appear in Japanese-Korean remake dramas. For this purpose, consider the form of expression from the function of prohibition and the social distance and hierarchical relationship. Brown & Levinson (1987) described the directive expression as face- threatening acts (FTA). Among them, prohibited expressions restrict the behavior of the hearer, so sufficient attention should be paid to speech. In this study, the functions of prohibition were divided into three categories based on the state of realization of prohibited acts. Social distance was divided into two categories based on the Japanese terms “uchi”, “soto” and “yoso” and the Korean terms “uri” and “nam”. Hierarchical relationship was divided into three categories based on social roles and age differences.
참고문헌 (16)
- 김영란, "한국어 금지 표현의 형식과 기능", 석사, 국어국문학, pp.1998
- 김영란, "한국어 금지 표현의 교수 방법", 한국어교육, 10(2), pp.171~193 (1999), 국제한국어교육학회
- 성은실, "한국어 금지 화행 연구", 석사, 국어학, pp.2010
- 이은희, "한국어 금지 표현 교육 연구", 박사, 국어국문학과, pp.2013
- 이은희, "한국어 교육을 위한 간접 금지 표현 연구", 이중언어학, 55, pp.285~314 (2014), 이중언어학회
- 伊藤俊一, "依頼と禁止の表現について—日本語コミュニケーション教育を視野に入れた基礎研究—", 愛知教育大学研究報告教育科学編, 70, pp.128~134 (2021), 愛知教育大学
- 柏崎雅世, "日本語教育基礎研究シリーズ1日本語における行為指示型表現の機能", pp.24~37 (1993), くろしお出版
- 清ルミ, "禁止の場面における現実の言語表現—医師と美術館員の場合", 世界の日本語教育, 16, pp.107~123 (2006), 国際交流基金
- 仁田義雄, "日本語のモダリティと人称", pp.225~254 (1991), ひつじ書房
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4第8部モダリティ", pp.66~81 (2003), くろしお出版
- 河正一, "インポライトネスにおけるフェイス侵害行為の考察", 地域政策研究, 17(1), pp.93~116 (2014), 高崎経済大学地域政策学会
- 宮崎和人, "新日本語文法選書4モダリティ", pp.42~77 (2002), くろしお出版
- 李楠, "日本語禁止表現の性質と類義関係についての研究", 博士, pp.2017
- Austin, J. L., "言語と行為", pp.248~276 (1978), 大修館書店
- Brown, P., "ポライトネス 言語使用における、ある普遍現象", pp.1~118 (2011), 研究社
- Searle, J. R., "表現と意味 言語行為論研究", pp.1~51 (2006), 誠信書房