言語景観に見られる禁止表現に関する研究 －ポライトネスの観点からの韓日対照－
A Study on the Prohibited Expressions in Language Landscape -Contrast between Korean and Japanese from the Perspective of Politeness-
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article, the prohibition signs found on street were studied and the prohibition items were divided by category. First, we observed what prohibited expressions were used and their usage patterns. Next, we examined strategies expressed in prohibited expressions from the perspective of Politeness and clarified the characteristics of both Korean and Japanese languages. Comparing the characteristics of Korean and Japanese, the Japanese used a stronger “direct prohibition.” This is the opposite of Kim Soon-nim (2011b), a previous study. The survey in this article was conducted more than 10 years after Kim Soon-in (2011b), and it is thought that the prohibited expression used for prohibition signs has changed over time. Analysis from the perspective of Politeness Strategy showed that the overall trend in Korean was to use Politeness Strategy, which takes into account the infringement of the listener’s negative face. Compared to Japanese, which has a high rate of direct prohibition, Korean uses more negative politeness strategies that “regularize” and indirectly prohibit prohibited acts than direct prohibition. In addition, the usage rate of incidental expressions is higher in Korean, and positive politeness strategies such as “inducing” actions or “reasoning” are used more to consider the reader’s face.
Abstract
In this article, the prohibition signs found on street were studied and the prohibition items were divided by category. First, we observed what prohibited expressions were used and their usage patterns. Next, we examined strategies expressed in prohibited expressions from the perspective of Politeness and clarified the characteristics of both Korean and Japanese languages. Comparing the characteristics of Korean and Japanese, the Japanese used a stronger “direct prohibition.” This is the opposite of Kim Soon-nim (2011b), a previous study. The survey in this article was conducted more than 10 years after Kim Soon-in (2011b), and it is thought that the prohibited expression used for prohibition signs has changed over time. Analysis from the perspective of Politeness Strategy showed that the overall trend in Korean was to use Politeness Strategy, which takes into account the infringement of the listener’s negative face. Compared to Japanese, which has a high rate of direct prohibition, Korean uses more negative politeness strategies that “regularize” and indirectly prohibit prohibited acts than direct prohibition. In addition, the usage rate of incidental expressions is higher in Korean, and positive politeness strategies such as “inducing” actions or “reasoning” are used more to consider the reader’s face.
참고문헌 (10)
- 岡田安代, "街角にみる｢禁止｣の談話分析—コミュニケーション方略の異文化比較のための考察—", 愛知教育大学研究報告(教育科学編), 45, pp.149~154 (1996), 愛知教育大学
- 岸江信介, "世界の言語景観日本の言語景観—景色のなかのことば", pp.218~226 (2011), 桂書房
- 김순임, "言語景観における日本語の禁止表現", 일어일문학연구, 76(1), pp.89~114 (2011), 한국일어일문학회[DOI]
- 김순임, "言語景観における禁止表現に関する日韓対照研究 -禁止項目による違いを中心に-", 일본어학연구, (30), pp.71~87 (2011), 한국일본어학회
- 庄司博史, "日本の言語景観", pp.9~15 (2009), 三元社
- 滝浦真人, "話し言葉と書き言葉の接点", pp.75~92 (2014), ひつじ書房
- 中崎温子, "｢禁止", 不許可｣掲示･標識表現の日･英語対照分析, 1999, pp.23, 179~189[DOI]
- 日本語記述文法研究会, "現代日本語文法4 第8節モダリティ", pp.79~81 (2009), くろしお出版
- ムティ･アフィファー, "日本とインドネシアの言語景観における禁止サイン—記号論的研究のために—", 人間社会環境研究, 40, pp.153~163 (2020), 金沢大学大学院人間社会環境研究科
- Brown, P., "ポライトネス—言語使用における、ある普遍現象—", pp.293~297 (2011), 研究社