본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

증여론과 인정: 협력의 장애요인에 관한 재고

The Gift and recognition: Rethinking obstacles to cooperation.

에릭 그리나비스키
탈분단경계문화연구원 (Institute of Trans-division and Border Studies(ITBS), Shinhan University)|2022.06|경계연구|제1권 제1호|pp. 128-161

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

외교선물인정
주제분류사회과학일반

초록

"본 연구에서는 남북 관계에 관한 외부 관점에서 《증여론》에 제시된 유용한 견해를 살펴보고자 한다. 특히, 인정의 정치(politics of recognition)를 통해 유익한 관계를 형성하는 과정에서 선물의 역할을 집중적으로 연구한다. 또한 인정의 중요성, 선물 교환 방식이정치적 조직의 수평적 또는 위계적인 구조를 형성하는 방식, 정책수단으로서 선물의 유용성에 대해 논한다. 선물의 인류학적 해석을 통해 국제 정치 분야의 근본적 질문에관해 다시 생각해볼 수 있다. 역사적으로 선물은 외교의 핵심 요소였다. 국가 간 교역, 동맹 등 교류의 심도 있는 패턴이 가능해지는관계가 구축되기에 앞서 선물을 먼저 교환한다. 선물은 향후 교류에 대한 기대를 형성하는 기저의 사회적 관계, 즉 인정의 망을 구축한다. 또한, 평등한 방식이라거나 위계적 방식 등 선물의 방식은당사국 간 관계의 유형에도 영향을 미친다. 증여론에 대한 검토를통해 남북한 관계에서의 원칙을 얻어낼 수 있다. 인정의 정치를 추구하는 정부의 정책이 필요하다. 상징적인 선물의 정치만으로 평화를 유지할 수는 없지만, 이는 반드시 필요하다. 남북한이 서로를대등한 상대로 인정하지 않는다면, 존중의 마음을 담은 선물이 갈등을 조장하는 경쟁적 시스템으로 바뀔 수 있다. 따라서 현재 상황에서는 상징적 정치에 관한 면밀한 연구가 그 어느 때보다도 중요하다."

Abstract

"This paper explore the ideas of in The Gift with an eye to what might be useful from an outside perspective for inter- Korean relations, Specially, I explore the reole of gift giving to create beneficial relationships though a politics of recognition. This paper explores the importance of recognition, how different kinds of gift exchange can create egalitarian or hierarchical modes of political organizations, and the utility of gift change as a policy tool. Topics of gift of international relations: two modes of Gift giving, recognition and exchange, hierarchy and equality, agentive interpretation, help us to rethink some fundamental questions of international politics. Historically gift giving is central to diplomacy. Before relationships form between states – in which deep patterns of trading, alliance-making, or other exchange become possible – gift giving has occurred. Gift giving create the background social relationships – webs of recognition – that create expectations for future exchange. Furthermore, the way in which are given – in an egalitarian or hierarchical manner – affects the kinds of relationships that states have. In the context of inter-Korean relations. If this view of gift giving is right, then a government policy (perhaps the current one) that favors a symbolic politics of recognition may be an appropriate policy to pursue. This symbolic politics of gift giving may not be sufficient to encourage peace, but it is necessary. If the two Koreas do not believe that they recognize one another as equals, then gift giving done in a spirit of respect may give way to a competitive system that encourages conflict. In the current atmosphere, therefore, I believe that a close study of symbolic politics is more important than ever before."

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Ariel Colonomos, "Hostageship: What Can We Learn from Mausss?", Journal of International Political Theory, 14(2), pp.240~256 (2018)
  2. Biedermann, Zoltán, "Global Gifts: The Material Culture of Diplomacy in Early Modern Eurasia" (2017), Cambridge University Press
  3. Brincat, Shannon, "Cosmopolitan Recognition : Three Vignettes", International Theory, 9(1), pp.1~32 (2017)
  4. Carrier, James, "Gifts in a World of Commodities: The Ideology of the Perfect Gift in American Society", Social Analysis, 29, pp.19~37 (1990)
  5. Carrier, James, "Gifts, Commodities, and Social Relations: A Maussian View of Exchange", Sociological Forum, 6(1), pp.119~136 (1991)
  6. Cohen, Raymond, "All in the Family: Ancient Near Eastern Diplomacy", International Negotiation, 1(1), pp.11~28 (1996)
  7. Davenport, Lisa, "Jazz Diplomacy: Promoting America in the Cold War Era" (2009), University Press of Mississippi
  8. Derrida, Jacques, "Given Time: I. Counterfeit Money" (1992), Counterfeit Money, University of Chicago Press
  9. Dillon, Wilton, "Gifts &Nations" (1968), Routledge
  10. Fearon, J. D, "Rationalist Explanations for War", International Organization, 49(3), pp.379~414 (1995)
  11. Finnemore, Martha, "Legitimacy, Hypocrisy, and the Social Structure of Unipolarity", World Politics, 61(1), pp.58~85 (2009)
  12. Geduld, Victoria Phillips, "Dancing Diplomacy: Martha Graham and the Strange Commodity of Cold-War Cultural Exchange in Asia, 1955 and 1974", Dance Chronicle, 33(1), pp.44~81 (2010)
  13. Geertz, Clifford, "Negara : The Theatre State In Nineteenth-Century Bali" (1981), Princeton University Press
  14. Giddens, Anthony, "The Constitution of Society" (1984), University of California Press
  15. Gregory, C. A., "Gifts and Commodities" (1982), Academic Press
  16. Grieco, Joseph, "Cooperation among Nations : Europe, America, and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade" (1990), Cornell University Press
  17. Gruber, Lloyd, "Ruling the World : Power Politics and the Rise of Supranational Institutions" (2000), Princeton University Press
  18. Grynaviski, Eric, "Hierarchy and Judicial Institutions: Arbitration and Ideology in the Hellenistic World", International Organization, 69(3), pp.697~729 (2015)
  19. Guilbaud, Auriane, "Generous Corporations? A Mausssian Analysis of International Drug Donations", Journal of International Political Theory, 14(2), pp.203~222 (2018)
  20. Heins, Volker, "Gift-Giving and Reciprocity in Global Society: Introducing Marcel Mauss in International Studies", Journal of International Political Theory, 14(2), pp.126~144 (2018)
  21. Heins, Volker, "Refugees Welcome:Arrival Gifts, Reciprocity, and the Integration of Forced Migrants", Journal of International Political Theory, 14(2), pp.223~239 (2018)
  22. Heins, Volker, "Realizing Honneth: Redistribution, Recognition, and Global Justice", Journal of Global Ethics, 4(2), pp.141~153 (2008)
  23. Hicks, Frederic, "Subject States and Tribute Provinces: The Aztec Empire in the Northern Valley of Mexico", Ancient Mesoamerica, 3(1), pp.1~10 (1992)
  24. Honneth, Axel, "The Struggle for Recognition: The Moral Grammar of Social Conflicts" (1995), Polity Press
  25. Jansson, Maija, "Measured Reciprocity: English Ambassadorial Gift Exchange in the 17th and 18th Centuries", Journal of Early Modern History, 9(3), pp.348~370 (2005)
  26. Kang, David, "Hierarchy and Legitimacy in International Systems: The Tribute System in Early Modern East Asia", Security Studies, 19(4), pp.591~622 (2010)
  27. Keohane, Robert, "After Hegemony : Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" (1984), Princeton University Press
  28. Klekar, Cynthia, "Prisoners in Silken Bonds’: Obligation, Trade, and Diplomacy in English Voyages to Japan and China", Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 6(1), pp.84~105 (2006)
  29. Kornprobst, Markus, "The Agent’s Logics of Action: Defining and Mapping Political Judgement", International Theory, 3(1), pp.70~104 (2011)
  30. Kowalski, Robert, "The Gift – Marcel Mauss and International Aid", Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(3), pp.189~205 (2011)
  31. Lake, David A., "Legitimating Power: The Domestic Politics of U.S. International Hierarchy", International Security, 38(2), pp.74~111 (2013)
  32. Lindemann, Thomas, "Interest, Passion, (Non)Recognition, and Wars: A Conceptual Essay", Global Discourse, 4(4), pp.483~496 (2014)
  33. Maryanski, Alexandra, "The Offspring of Functionalism: French and British Structuralism", Sociological Theory, 9(1), pp.106~115 (1991)
  34. Mausss, Marcel, "The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies" (2011), Martino
  35. Murray, Michelle, "The International Politics of Recognition", pp.131~152 (2012), Paradigm
  36. Myhre, Knut Christian,, "The Anthropological Concept of Action and Its Problems : A ‘New’ Approach Based on Marcel Mausss and Aristotle", Journal of the Anthropological Society of Oxford, 29(2) (1998)
  37. Oates, John G., "Reciprocity, Hierarchy, and Obligation in World Politics: From Kula to Potlatch", Journal of International Political Theory, 14(2), pp.145~164 (2018)
  38. Reus-Smit, Christian, "International Crises of Legitimacy", International Politics, 44(2, pp.3) (2007), 157~174
  39. Ringmar, Erik, "Recognition and the Origins of International Society", Global Discourse, 4(4), pp.446~458 (2014)
  40. Schelling, Thomas, "The Strategy of Conflict" (1960), Harvard University Press
  41. Schelling, Thomas, "Arms and Influence" (1966), Yale University Press
  42. Schroeder, Robert,, "Here are the gifts the Trumps got from foreign leaders", Market Watch. March, 6 (2019)
  43. Shannon, Timothy, "Iroquois Diplomacy on the Early American Frontier" (2008), Viking
  44. Sharp, Paul, "Diplomatic Theory of International Relations" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  45. Stirrat, R. L., "The Development Gift:The Problem of Reciprocity in the NGO World", The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554(1), pp.66~80 (1997)
  46. Wendt, Alexander E., "The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory", International Organization, 41(3), pp.335~370 (1987)
  47. Wendt, Alexander E., "Social Theory of International Politics" (1999), Cambridge University Press
  48. Wendt, Alexander E., "Why a World State Is Inevitable", European Journal of International Relations, 9(4), pp.491~542 (2003)
  49. Wight, Colin, "They Shoot Dead Horses Don’t They?: Locating Agency in the Agent-Structure Problematique", European Journal of International Relations, 5(1), pp.109~142 (1999)
  50. Wolf, Reinhard, "Respect and Disrespect in International Politics: The Significance of Status Recognition", International Theory, 3(1), pp.105~142 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

포스트 코로나 시대 남북협력의 전환적 모색: 마르셀 모스의 증여론의 적용이영훈탈분단경계문화연구원 · 경계연구2022 · 제1권 제1호안보를 위한 증여, 증여를 위한 불확실성: 국제사회의 리스크와 불확실성이경묵탈분단경계문화연구원 · 경계연구2022 · 제1권 제1호인정투쟁에서 상호취약성의 인정으로 전환하는 남북민간개발협력의 방향이기범탈분단경계문화연구원 · 경계연구2022 · 제1권 제1호인정게임(Recognition Game)으로서 북미관계: 김정은 시기 북미관계의 밀착, 교착, 파행을 중심으로김진욱, 박성호이화사회과학원 · 사회과학연구논총2025 · 제41권 제2호대북 인도적 지원에 따른 진단과 통일정책을 위한 시사점박균열한국윤리학회 · 倫理硏究2005 · 제1권 제58호남북관계의 과제: 화해와 협력주봉호동아시아국제정치학회 · 국제정치연구2014 · 제17권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

인정투쟁에서 상호취약성의 인정으로 전환하는 남북민간개발협력의 방향이기범pp. 12-59포스트 코로나 시대 남북협력의 전환적 모색: 마르셀 모스의 증여론의 적용이영훈pp. 60-97안보를 위한 증여, 증여를 위한 불확실성: 국제사회의 리스크와 불확실성이경묵pp. 98-125아일랜드의 평화구축 과정: 신뢰의 문제폴 아서pp. 162-189좌담: 증여와 남북관계이경묵, 남영호, 이혜정, 박세진, 구갑우pp. 192-230
원문 보기