교육과정 연계형 선발의 방법론: 미국 사례를 중심으로
Methodology of the selection by articulation between secondary and higher curriculum - focused on a case in America -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analyze the framework of the educational system in America and of the selection system through literature studies and case studies, based on the conceptualization that the admission officer system is a typical selection system by the linkage of high school-university curriculum. The results are as follows. First, educational policies are collected and operated by the state government. Second, the type of admissions is simplified to early admissions, regular admissions, and occasional admissions. Third, as an example, UC Berkeley is conducting a university admission with a method of 'holistic reviews'. Fourth, the characteristics of institutional operations in America are that the curriculum in high school is independent of the selection in university for guaranteeing normal operation. The selection is made by articulation between secondary and higher education, and the admission data is unified regardless of admission types. Using the case of the admission officer system analyzed in this study, first, various admission materials are used such as recommendations from counselors and teachers, and letters of self-introduction as well as high-school records when selecting students. Also, the high school records are of more importance and have greater weight to university admission than the national standardized testing. The framework of universities' selection systems applies a model that selects students who meet the purpose of the major unit education by emphasizing the context of social selection and reflecting the university's ideology and educational need. The university entrance exam, called the college scholastic ability test, is considered as a competitive system. But in order for the admissions officer system to actually contribute as a mechanism towards the candidate’s selection the linkage of high school-university curriculum in the educational situation in Korea must be included in the admission process, otherwise the weight of standardized test alone has the opposite crippling effect on the influence of high school curriculum. First of all, it is necessary to minimize the influence the college scholastic ability test and to extend nation-owned evaluation rights to individual schools and teachers. In addition, it is necessary to change the direction of the university's student selection method to the "major unit selection system' that selects students who meet the purpose of the major unit education.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the framework of the educational system in America and of the selection system through literature studies and case studies, based on the conceptualization that the admission officer system is a typical selection system by the linkage of high school-university curriculum. The results are as follows. First, educational policies are collected and operated by the state government. Second, the type of admissions is simplified to early admissions, regular admissions, and occasional admissions. Third, as an example, UC Berkeley is conducting a university admission with a method of 'holistic reviews'. Fourth, the characteristics of institutional operations in America are that the curriculum in high school is independent of the selection in university for guaranteeing normal operation. The selection is made by articulation between secondary and higher education, and the admission data is unified regardless of admission types. Using the case of the admission officer system analyzed in this study, first, various admission materials are used such as recommendations from counselors and teachers, and letters of self-introduction as well as high-school records when selecting students. Also, the high school records are of more importance and have greater weight to university admission than the national standardized testing. The framework of universities' selection systems applies a model that selects students who meet the purpose of the major unit education by emphasizing the context of social selection and reflecting the university's ideology and educational need. The university entrance exam, called the college scholastic ability test, is considered as a competitive system. But in order for the admissions officer system to actually contribute as a mechanism towards the candidate’s selection the linkage of high school-university curriculum in the educational situation in Korea must be included in the admission process, otherwise the weight of standardized test alone has the opposite crippling effect on the influence of high school curriculum. First of all, it is necessary to minimize the influence the college scholastic ability test and to extend nation-owned evaluation rights to individual schools and teachers. In addition, it is necessary to change the direction of the university's student selection method to the "major unit selection system' that selects students who meet the purpose of the major unit education.
참고문헌 (35)
- 강태중, "입학사정관제도의 정착을 위한 연구: 미국의 사례를 중심으로", 아시아교육연구, 10(4), pp.151~175 (2009), 교육연구소
- 김경범, "미국과 일본 대학의 입학사정관제 운영 사례와 시사점", 비교교육연구, 19(3), pp.79~106 (2009), 한국비교교육학회
- 학교의 교육력 제공방안, "김민남", 대통령자문 교육혁신위원회, ~, pp.정책연구 2004-05 (2004)
- 김민남, "한국교육론" (2006), 경북대학교출판부
- 박도순, "미국의 대학입학 전형제도에 관한 연구", 교육문제연구, 7, pp.1~29 (1995)
- 박소영, "대학의 입학전형제도 개선노력", 교육정책포럼, 통권 : 79, pp.17~19 (2004), 한국교육개발원
- 성태제, "미국 대학의 입학사정 준거 탐색과 우리나라 대학입학제도를 위한 제언", 교육평가연구, 8(1), pp.123~151 (1995)
- 입학사정관제의 기원, "손종현", 15~40, pp.입학전형과 평가, 제1호 (2010)
- 손종현, "전공단위 선발제도의 철학적 탐색", 교육철학, (44), pp.157~196 (2011), 한국교육철학회
- 손종현, "경쟁과 선발과 교육의 시스템의 전환", 교육철학, (48), pp.89~122 (2012), 한국교육철학회
- 신경희, "교육과정 자율적 운영에 관한 교사의 역할 수행 비교: 한국과 미국교사를 중심으로", 교사교육연구, 51(2), pp.297~312 (2012), 과학교육연구소
- 양성관, "미국 대학입학제도의 전형자료, 입학사정관제도 및 기여입학제도 분석:개별적 검토를 중심으로", 비교교육연구, 17(3), pp.167~190 (2007), 한국비교교육학회
- 이종승, "미국 대학입학시험(ACT)의 평가내용과 개발과정", 대학교육, 76, pp.64~74 (1995)
- 정일용, "미국 프랑스 영국 교육제도" (2013), 서울대학교출판문화원
- 정일환, "미국대학 입학사정관제도의 운영사례와 시사점", 비교교육연구, 18(4), pp.113~139 (2008), 한국비교교육학회
- 학생부종합전형, 올해도 대세!, "Daily UNN", 2017
- 한국대학교육협의회, "2018학년도 대학입학전형기본사항 발표. 보도자료", ~ (2005)
- Clinedinst M., "2015 State of college admission" (2016), National Association for College Admission Counseling
- "2017-18 The SAT Subject Tests – Student Guide" (2017)[URL]
- "Subject Areas" (2017)[URL]
- Commission on Teacher Credentialing, "California Standards for the Teaching Profession(CSTP)(2009)", ~ (2009)
- NACAC, "Guide to the College Admission Process", National Association for College Admission Counseling, ~ (2015)
- Step by Step: College Awareness and Planning: Early High School, "NACAC", National Association for College Admission Counseling, ~ (2017)
- Step by Step: College Awareness and Planning: Late High School, "NACAC", National Association for College Admission Counseling, ~ (2017)
- "State Education Data Profiles" (2014)[URL]
- Digest of education statistics 2011, "Snyder, T. D.", National Center for Education Statistics, ~ (2016)
- Stats in Brief – Public School Techer Autonomy in the Classroom School Year 2003-04, 2007-08, 2011-12, "Sparks, D.", National Center for Education Statistics, ~ (2015)
- "University of California, Berkeley Freshman Admis sions Policy Fall 2017" (2017)[URL]
- "Personal Insight Question" (2017)[URL]
- "How Berkeley Selects Students" (2017)[URL]
- "Dates & Deadline" (2017)[URL]
- "Presenting Yourself on the UC Application for Undergraduate Admission–Freshmen" (2016)[URL]
- "About applying online" (2017)[URL]
- "The Federal Role in Education" (2017)[URL]
- "An Overview of the U.S. Department of Education" (2017)[URL]
