의과대학생의 개인적 특성과 선호 전공 분야에 따른 직업가치 인식의 차이
Medical student perception of physician values in practice by individual characteristics and preferred medical specialty field
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Medical students’ values figure prominently in their choice of medical specialty; yet, little research has been performedon this topic. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in values according to medical students' individualcharacteristics (medical educational system, gender, and grade) and preferred medical specialty. Methods: A total of 905 medical students participated in the study; 426 were graduate-entry medical students (GEMS), and 479were undergraduate medical students (UMS). Further, 561 were male and 316 were female; 356 were in year 1, 219 were in year2, 230 were in year 3, and 100 were in year 4. Students completed the Physician Values in Practice Scale (PVIPS). The PVIPS comprisessix dimensions: autonomy, management, prestige, service, lifestyle, and scholarly pursuits. The data were analyzed by t-test andanalysis of variance. Results: GEMS had higher scores for service, management, and scholarly pursuits than UMS. Males had higher scores for prestige,lifestyle, and management, whereas female scored higher on service and scholarly pursuits. Higher grade was associated with increasedscores for prestige, lifestyle, and management. The differences in lifestyle and scholarly pursuits were significant between preferredspecialties. Students in support specialties scored significantly higher on lifestyle. With regard to scholarly pursuits, basic sciencespecialties scored significantly higher than other specialties. Conclusion: There were significant differences in PVIPS according to individual characteristics and preferred medical specialty. Thisresult could be useful in developing a medical specialty choice program for medical students.
Abstract
Purpose: Medical students’ values figure prominently in their choice of medical specialty; yet, little research has been performedon this topic. The purpose of this study was to analyze the differences in values according to medical students' individualcharacteristics (medical educational system, gender, and grade) and preferred medical specialty. Methods: A total of 905 medical students participated in the study; 426 were graduate-entry medical students (GEMS), and 479were undergraduate medical students (UMS). Further, 561 were male and 316 were female; 356 were in year 1, 219 were in year2, 230 were in year 3, and 100 were in year 4. Students completed the Physician Values in Practice Scale (PVIPS). The PVIPS comprisessix dimensions: autonomy, management, prestige, service, lifestyle, and scholarly pursuits. The data were analyzed by t-test andanalysis of variance. Results: GEMS had higher scores for service, management, and scholarly pursuits than UMS. Males had higher scores for prestige,lifestyle, and management, whereas female scored higher on service and scholarly pursuits. Higher grade was associated with increasedscores for prestige, lifestyle, and management. The differences in lifestyle and scholarly pursuits were significant between preferredspecialties. Students in support specialties scored significantly higher on lifestyle. With regard to scholarly pursuits, basic sciencespecialties scored significantly higher than other specialties. Conclusion: There were significant differences in PVIPS according to individual characteristics and preferred medical specialty. Thisresult could be useful in developing a medical specialty choice program for medical students.
참고문헌 (20)
- Leigh JP, "Physician career satisfaction across specialties", Arch Intern Med, 162, pp.1577~1584 (2002)
- Haas JS, "Is the professional satisfaction of general internists associated with patient satisfaction?", J Gen Intern Med, 15, pp.122~128 (2000)
- Jeon WT, "Guide of medical specialty choice for medical student" (2014), Koonja
- Chung SJ, "Designing of an education model for career planning in medical schools", Korean J Med Educ, 13, pp.309~315 (2001)
- 허예라, "의과대학생의 직업흥미유형과 학생 진로지도 프로그램에서의 활용", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 24(4), pp.309~317 (2012), 한국의학교육학회[DOI]
- Borges NJ, "Personality and medical specialty choice : a literature review and integration", J Career Assess, 10, pp.362~380 (2002)
- Bouwkamp-Memmer JC, "Work values and job satisfaction of family physicians", J Vocat Behav, 82, pp.248~255 (2013)
- Hojat M, "Medical students' personal values and their career choices a quarter-century later", Psychol Rep, 83, pp.243~248 (1998)
- Newton DA, "The variable influence of lifestyle and income on medical students'career specialty choices: data from two U.S. medical schools, 1998-2004", Acad Med 2005;, 80, pp.809~814 (2005)
- Bland CJ, "Determinants of primary care specialty choice : a non-statistical metaanalysis of the literature", Acad Med, 70, pp.620~641 (1995)
- Borges NJ, "Stability of values during medical school", Med Teach, 32, pp.779~781 (2010)
- Rogers ME, "A multivariate analysis of personality, values and expectations as correlates of career aspirations of final year medical students", Int J Educ Vocat Guid, 10, pp.177~189 (2010)
- Lim KY, "Student characteristics that influence medical career decisions", Korean J Med Educ, 14, pp.269~286 (2002)
- 이지혜, "의학전문대학원생과 의과대학생의 전문 과목 선택에 영향을 미치는 요인 비교", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 21(4), pp.393~402 (2009), 한국의학교육학회
- Hartung PJ, "The physician values in practice scale : construction and initial validation", J Vocat Behav, 67, pp.309~320 (2005)
- Hartung PJ, "Physician values in practice scale: technical manua" (2012), Association of American Medical Colleges
- Kang PS, "Premedical students'motivations for a career as a physician", Korean J Med Educ, 6, pp.9~19 (1994)
- 박귀화, "의학전문대학원 논문 작성 교육과정 운영 경험", Korean Journal of Medical Education, 23(2), pp.103~110 (2011), 한국의학교육학회
- Dorsey ER, "Influence of controllable lifestyle on recent trends in specialty choice by US medical students", JAMA, 290, pp.1173~1178 (2003)
- Duffy RD, "Personality, vocational interests, and work values of medical students", J Career Assess, 17, pp.189~200 (2009)