American Foreign Policy Traditions Revisited: What’s at stake in Donald Trump’s foreign policy
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study examines the Jacksonian tendencies of Donald Trump’s foreign policy, and suggests the need for a modification of Walter Russell Mead’s typology of US foreign policy traditions (Wilsonian, Hamiltonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian). This change will enhance its logical coherence and secure its efficiency as an academic tool. The amended version utilizes two factors to define foreign policy traditions: its situation in international politics and arena (hegemony-nation centric) and the relation of other countries to the national interest (realistic-idealistic view). These changes turn a largely historical discourse and colorful description of US foreign policy outlooks into a method to analyze not just recent US administrations’ foreign policy agendas, but the nature of the foreign policy tradition itself. According to this approach and the resulting analysis, Trump represents the distillation of the nation-centric, realist, Jacksonian tradition, and it rose to power in revolt against the decades-long dominance of the hegemony-centric, idealist, Wilsonian tradition. This shift will not end even if Trump loses the presidency.
Abstract
This study examines the Jacksonian tendencies of Donald Trump’s foreign policy, and suggests the need for a modification of Walter Russell Mead’s typology of US foreign policy traditions (Wilsonian, Hamiltonian, Jeffersonian, and Jacksonian). This change will enhance its logical coherence and secure its efficiency as an academic tool. The amended version utilizes two factors to define foreign policy traditions: its situation in international politics and arena (hegemony-nation centric) and the relation of other countries to the national interest (realistic-idealistic view). These changes turn a largely historical discourse and colorful description of US foreign policy outlooks into a method to analyze not just recent US administrations’ foreign policy agendas, but the nature of the foreign policy tradition itself. According to this approach and the resulting analysis, Trump represents the distillation of the nation-centric, realist, Jacksonian tradition, and it rose to power in revolt against the decades-long dominance of the hegemony-centric, idealist, Wilsonian tradition. This shift will not end even if Trump loses the presidency.
참고문헌 (26)
- Brooks, Stephen G, "Don’t Come Home, America: The Case against Retrenchment", International Security, 37(3) (2012)
- Bruscino, Thomas, "The Rooseveltian Tradition: Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and George W. Bush", White House Studies, 10(4) (2011)
- "“Can U.S. Democracy Policy Survive Trump?” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. October 1. Can U.S. Democracy Policy Survive Trump? - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace" (2018)[URL]
- Cha, Taesuh, "The Return of Jacksonianism: The International Implications of the Trump Phenomenon", The Washington Quarterly, 39(4) (2016)
- Clarke, Michael, "Understanding the Return of the Jacksonian Tradition", Orbis, 61(1) (2016)
- Clarke, Michael, "Donald Trump and American Foreign Policy: The Return of the Jacksonian Tradition", Comparative Strategy, 36(4) (2017)
- Cooley, Alexander, "Exit from Hegemony: The Unraveling of the American Global Order" (2020), Oxford University Press
- Drezner, Daniel W, "The Angry Populist as Foreign Policy Leader: Real Change or Just Hot Ai", Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 41(2) (2017)
- Hamilton, Daniel S, "Trump’s Jacksonian Foreign Policy and its Implications for European Security", Ulbrief, (2) (2017)
- Holland, Jack, "The Discursive Hegemony of Trump’s Jacksonian Populism: Race, Class, and Gender in Constructions and Contestations of US National Identity, 2016-2018", Politics, 41(1) (2021)
- Hook, Steven W, "American Foreign Policy Since World WarⅡ" (2016), SAGE
- son, Valerie M, "Foreign Policy Analysis: Classic and Contemporary Theory" (2014), Rowman & Littlefield
- ones, David Martin, "Donald Trump and the New Jacksonians", Policy, 3(1) (2017)
- Kaufman, Joyce P, "The Concise History of U.S. Foreign Policy" (2010), Rowman & Littlefield
- Lieven, Anatol, "Clinton and Trump: Two Faces of American Nationalism", Survival, 58(5) (2016)
- Lotz, Hellmut, "Culture and Foreign Policy" (1997), Lynne Rienner
- Löfflmann, Georg, "America First and the Populist Impact on US foreign Policy", Survival, 61(6) (2019)
- Macdonald, Paul K, "America First? Explaining Continuity and Change in Trump’s Foreign Policy", Political Science Quarterly, 133(3) (2018)
- McDougall, Walter A, "Promised Land, Crusader State: The American Encounter with the World Since 1776" (1997), Houghton Mifflin
- Mead, Walter Russell, "The Jacksonian Tradition and American Foreign Policy", The National Interest, 58(5) (1999)
- Mead, Walter Russell, "Special Providence: American Foreign Policy and How It Changed the World" (2001), Alfred A. Knopf
- Mead, Walter Russell, "The Jacksonian Revolt: American Populism and the Liberal Order", Foreign Affairs, 96(2) (2017)
- Rosati, Jerel A, "The Politics of United States Foreign Policy" (2007), Thomson Wadsworth
- 서정건, "트럼프 행정부와 미국외교의 잭슨주의 전환", 한국과 국제정치, 33(1), pp.63~91 (2017), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- "The Free and Open Indo-Pacific Strategy: India’s Wary Response" (2018)[URL]
- Trump, Donald J, "Crippled America: How to Make America Great Again" (2015), Threshold Editions
