베케트 텍스트의 불확정성: 몰로이를 중심으로
The Indeterminacy of the Beckettian Text: Focusing on Molloy
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Molloy, one of the novels in Samuel Beckett’s trilogy is the ultimate in terms of his fiction aesthetics. Beckett emphasizes that form and substance are both materials of art and that art itself is an object to be negated, confronting the conventional notion that substance should convey truth. He demonstrates this idea well through the indeterminacy of text in Molloy. To understand Molloy precisely, form and substance should be considered together. In Molloy, nothing is fixed and everything is dubious or denied. As the characters split over several selves, which seem to have autonomous control, no one can decide which one is real. Those selves also move unceasingly. Moreover, the structures of the first part and the second part form an infinite repetition and circulation. Through analyzing the text carefully in regards to the above-mentioned techniques, this article aims to demonstrate the indeterminacy of text in Molloy. Further, it highlights the feature of a Möbius strip in the relationship between Molloy and Moran exploring the repetition and circulation of form and substance. Through this analysis, the article aims to present the depth and unique color of Beckett’s novels.
Abstract
Molloy, one of the novels in Samuel Beckett’s trilogy is the ultimate in terms of his fiction aesthetics. Beckett emphasizes that form and substance are both materials of art and that art itself is an object to be negated, confronting the conventional notion that substance should convey truth. He demonstrates this idea well through the indeterminacy of text in Molloy. To understand Molloy precisely, form and substance should be considered together. In Molloy, nothing is fixed and everything is dubious or denied. As the characters split over several selves, which seem to have autonomous control, no one can decide which one is real. Those selves also move unceasingly. Moreover, the structures of the first part and the second part form an infinite repetition and circulation. Through analyzing the text carefully in regards to the above-mentioned techniques, this article aims to demonstrate the indeterminacy of text in Molloy. Further, it highlights the feature of a Möbius strip in the relationship between Molloy and Moran exploring the repetition and circulation of form and substance. Through this analysis, the article aims to present the depth and unique color of Beckett’s novels.
참고문헌 (9)
- Beckett, Samuel, "Three Novels by Samuel Beckett" (1958), Grove Press
- Cohn, Ruby, "Back to Beckett. Princeton" (1973), Princeton UP
- Connor, Steven, "Samuel Beckett: repetition, theory and text" (1988), Basil Blackwell
- Frye, Northrop, "The Nightmare Life in Death" (1985), Chelsea House Publishers
- Hayman, David, "Samuel Beckett Now" (1975), Chicago UP
- Hill, Leslie, "Beckett’s fiction" (1990), Cambridge UP
- Iser, Wolfgang, "The Pattern of Negativity in Beckett’s Prose" (1985), Chelsea House Publishers
- Kern, Edith, "Moran-Molloy: The Hero as Author" (1985), Chelsea House Publishers
- Uhlmann, Anthony, "Beckett and Poststructuralism" (1999), Cambridge UP