Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Social Justice Scale (K-SJS-24)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to validate a Korean Version of the Social Justice Scale (K-SJS-24). The study participants included 1,000 Korean adults aged 19 years and above who were recruited through a survey panel website. Several analyses were conducted, including reliability and validity assessments, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and confirmatory factor analysis, to examine the psychometric properties of the scale. Additionally, structural equation modeling was employed to investigate the relationships between latent factors, guided by Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Consistent with the original scale developed by Torres-Harding, Siers, and Olson (2012), four factors, attitudes toward social justice (SJA), social justice perceived behavioral control (SJPBC), social justice subjective norms (SJSN), and social justice behavioral intentions (SJBI) were found in the Korean sample. The results and fit indices indicated an acceptable model fit for a four-factor model of the data (CFI = .910, TLI = .900, RMSEA = .085, and SRMR = .072). Therefore, the K-SJS-24 is a valid measurement tool that can be used in a Korean context. The implications for social work research, education, and practice were discussed.
Abstract
This study aimed to validate a Korean Version of the Social Justice Scale (K-SJS-24). The study participants included 1,000 Korean adults aged 19 years and above who were recruited through a survey panel website. Several analyses were conducted, including reliability and validity assessments, t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and confirmatory factor analysis, to examine the psychometric properties of the scale. Additionally, structural equation modeling was employed to investigate the relationships between latent factors, guided by Ajzen's theory of planned behavior. Consistent with the original scale developed by Torres-Harding, Siers, and Olson (2012), four factors, attitudes toward social justice (SJA), social justice perceived behavioral control (SJPBC), social justice subjective norms (SJSN), and social justice behavioral intentions (SJBI) were found in the Korean sample. The results and fit indices indicated an acceptable model fit for a four-factor model of the data (CFI = .910, TLI = .900, RMSEA = .085, and SRMR = .072). Therefore, the K-SJS-24 is a valid measurement tool that can be used in a Korean context. The implications for social work research, education, and practice were discussed.
참고문헌 (46)
- 불공정한 우위가 없는 경쟁 실질적 기회의 평등, "김을식", 경기연구원, ~ (2022)
- 남현주, "사회정의연구의 두 영역: 규범적 영역과 경험적 영역", 사회보장연구, 23(2), pp.135~159 (2007), 한국사회보장학회
- 민문경, "사회 인지 관점에 따른 사회 정의 관심과 실천 모형의 검증: 국내 대학생을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지: 문화 및 사회문제, 20(2), pp.133~154 (2014), 한국문화및사회문제심리학회
- 한국사회 공정성 인식조사 보고서, "박종선", 한국리서치, ~ (2018)
- 박지영, "사회적 정의, 인권에 기반한 사회복지실천 재고: 사회복지사의 역량 그리고 우리 현장에 관하여", 2017 한국사회복지행정학회 춘계학술대회 자료집, pp.1451~1465 (2017)
- 양만재, "사회복지현장에서의 사회정의의 인식과 실천", 2017 한국사회복지행정학회 춘계학술대회 자료집, pp.291~297 (2017)
- 이명호, "한국사회의 공정과 능력주의 담론 다시 보기: 사회정의(사회복지 가치)의 관점에서", 사회사상과 문화, 24(4), pp.123~153 (2021), 동양사회사상학회
- 이혜경, "사회복지와 배분적 정의" (1998), 한국연구재단
- 임은미, "한국 상담자를 위한 사회문제 옹호 척도(SIAS)의 타당성 검증", 상담학연구, 17(4), pp.51~70 (2016), 한국상담학회[DOI]
- 임은미, "한국 상담자를 위한 사회정의 옹호역량 척도(SJACS-K)의 개발 및 타당화", 상담학연구, 18(6), pp.17~36 (2017), 한국상담학회[DOI]
- 전선영, "사회복지 가치를 매개로 한 사회복지 교육과 옹호 태도 및 전략의 인과관계 분석", 한국사회복지학, 57(4), pp.35~66 (2005), 한국사회복지학회
- 한국사회복지교육협의회, "사회복지 교과목 지침서", ~ (2022)
- "윤리강령" (2023), 한국사회복지사협회[URL]
- 홍경준, "분배의 쟁점과 사회복지: 분배적 정의와 사회복지", 사회복지연구, 5, pp.34~65 (1994)
- OECD국가의 사회지출과 경제성장, "홍석표", 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2005)
- Banerjee, M. M., "Social work scholars’ representation of Rawls: A critique", Journal of Social Work Education, 47(2), pp.189~211 (2011)
- Blackmore, J., "Leadership for social justice: A transnational dialogue", Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 4(1), pp.1~10 (2009)
- "The Origins of Social Justice: Taparelli D’Azeglio" (2014)[URL]
- Chechak, D., "Social work as a value-based profession: Value conflicts and implications for practitioners’ self-concepts", Journal of Social Work Values and Ethics, 12(2), pp.41~48 (2015)
- Madonna G. Constantine, "Social Justice and Multicultural Issues: Implications for the Practice and Training of Counselors and Counseling Psychologists", Journal of Counseling & Development, 85(1), pp.24~29 (2007), Wiley[DOI]
- Corning, A., "Individual orientation toward engagement in social action", Political Psychology, 23(4), pp.703~729 (2002)
- Dean, J. K., "Quantifying Social Justice Advocacy Competency: Development of the Social Justice Advocacy Scale", Doctoral, pp.2009
- Dono, J., "The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), pp.178~186 (2010)
- Nancy E. Downing, "From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women", The Counseling Psychologist, 13(4), pp.695~709 (1985), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Perihan Elif Ekmekci, "Enhancing John Rawlss theory of justice to cover health and social determinants of health", Acta bioethica, 21(2), pp.227~236 (2015), SciELO Agencia Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo (ANID)[DOI]
- Leandre R. Fabrigar, "Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research", Psychological Methods, 4(3), pp.272~299 (1999), American Psychological Association (APA)[DOI]
- Claes Fornell, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981), JSTOR[DOI]
- Fouad, N. A., "Handbook for social justice in counseling psychology: Leadership, vision, and action", pp.1~16 (2006), Sage Publications
- Freeman, S., "Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy" (2019)
- Galambos, C., "From the editor: A dialogue on social justice", Journal of Social Work Education, 44(2), pp.1~5 (2008)
- Li‐tze Hu, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), pp.1~55 (1999), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Kline, R. B., "Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling" (2016), The Guilford Press
- Miller, D., "Principles of Social Justice" (2001), Harvard University Press
- Miller, M. J., "College students’ social justice interest and commitment: A socialcognitive perspective", Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(4), pp.495~507 (2009)
- Nilsson, J. E., "Development and assessment of the social issues advocacy scale", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), pp.258~275 (2011)
- Mike O'Brien, "Social justice: Alive and well (partly) in social work practice?", International Social Work, 54(2), pp.174~190 (2010), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- Isaac Prilleltensky, "Value‐Based Praxis in Community Psychology: Moving Toward Social Justice and Social Action", American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), pp.747~778 (2001), Wiley[DOI]
- Reisch, M., "Defining social justice in a socially unjust world", Families in Society : The Journal of Oontemporary Human Services, 83(4), pp.343~354 (2002)
- Ami D Sperber, "Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research", Gastroenterology, 126(1 Suppl 1), pp.S124~S128 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Keith S. Taber, "The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education", Research in Science Education, 48(6), pp.1273~1296 (2017), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Toporek, R. L, "Handbook for Social justice in Counseling Psychology: Leadership, Vision, and Action", pp.17~34 (2006), Sage Publications, Inc
- Susan R. Torres-Harding, "Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Social Justice Scale (SJS)", American Journal of Community Psychology, 50(1-2), pp.77~88 (2011), Wiley[DOI]
- Jerome Carl Wakefield, "Psychotherapy, Distributive Justice, and Social Work: Part 1: Distributive Justice as a Conceptual Framework for Social Work", Social Service Review, 62(2), pp.187~210 (1988), University of Chicago Press[DOI]
- Yan Xia, "RMSEA, CFI, and TLI in structural equation modeling with ordered categorical data: The story they tell depends on the estimation methods", Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), pp.409~428 (2018), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
