울주 천전리 서석의 大朗銘 검토

Abstract

In the past, Daerang[大朗] was divided into Daerang[大郞] or Dae[Dae] and Rang[Rang], but Seoseok's inscription[書石銘] is definitely Daerang[大朗]. This thesis is a reexamination of the view that Daerang was regarded as Hwarang. Daerang[大郞] is definitely Daerang[大朗], but Junrang[俊朗] is also written as Junrang[ 俊郞], and Hwangrang[滉朗]･Wonrang[圓朗] as a human name was also used as a common language. Therefore, this study examined Daerang[大郞] as an alias of Daerang[大朗], and furthermore, considered whether Daerang[大朗] is a human name or a common language. The inscription is a short two-letter word, but there are few things to consider in order to understand its substance and meaning. I looked to see if the daerang[大朗] was a graffiti as a commercial word meaning, or a name like a guest book. First of all, I wanted to find the clue in Seo Seok's inscription. First, I paid attention to Wolrang[月朗], which is a inscription with ‘rang’[朗] in Seoseok and has a clear human name. The basis of the name is based on Wolrang. I compared Wolrang and Daerang's origins through Yegwoong inscription[芮雄銘], which has the same time of visit as Wolrang and others, and visiting inscriptions of more than three people. Second, I looked for the inscriptions that carved the name in Seokseok and paid attention to its method and type. The method of engraving names was divided into three categories: ‘name’, ‘date of visit+visitor name’, ‘date of visit+visitor name+visit contents.’ Among them, Daerang is the first one, so the type was divided into ‘original name’, ‘original name+Rang’[郞], and ‘□+Rang’[郞]. Among them, Daerang is the first, and when I looked for Seoseok's inscription, who carved only the original name, I could confirm the type from the monk or the person who was formerly a Hwarang. Third, I tried to confirm the difference and common point with Daerang by referring to the names of Hwarang and monks in Seoseok. ‘□+Rang’[郞], which appears with the expression of Nangdo[郎徒], can be generally seen as Hwarang. And the characters appearing with the expressions of ‘Seung[僧]’ and ‘Bobsa[法師]’ are clearly monks. Among the figures without such expressions, I searched for the figures presumed to be monks through the contents of the inscriptions. As a result, Daerang was not an abbreviation[略稱] but an original name, and it can be said that it is not a monk. It is not known whether it was Hwarang before visiting Seoseokgok[書石谷], but it can not be seen as Hwarang at the time of the visit.