개화기 이후 한국(남한)에서의 문자 개혁
Writing Reform in Korea (South Korea) Since Time of Enlightment
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this paper writing reform which was driven since time of enlightment in Korea and 1945 in south Korea, has been reviewed. Writing reform has become since the time of enlightment when there have been a movement to use Korean characters, Hangeul instead of Chinese characters in official documents in Korea. However, it was difficult to use only Hangeul suddenly, therefore, we wrote mixing Korean and Chinese letters quite a while. Since 1945, Chinese characters abolition movement has risen up and the policy to use only Hangeul has strongly enforced twice in government too, use of Hangeul has been increased and recently we have arrived to the stage mainly using only Hangeul in our lives. While Hangeul becomes important, the work to realign Hangeul's orthography also became an urgent task. Since invention of Hangeul, we have mainly used phonemic orthography which is written in the sounding way, however an outstanding Korean linguist Ju Si-gyeong insisted morphophonemic orthography which writes words' constant form. The latter is the orthography adopted by Korea now, however there have been several disputes until it is settled. The third task of writing reform was to write Hangeul in released way. Hangeul has a few letters for consonants and vowels, however since it makes complete syllabic letter collecting these letters, the number of the syllabic letters are too many. Owing to this, there is inconvenience, so the insistence to use them not to collect but to release came out. The various measures were proposed, however this insistence was not admitted. As was shown, writing reform have been progressed with a lot of disputes for a long time on three issues, so the aspect of use of Hangeul in between enlightment period and now has been changed much.
Abstract
In this paper writing reform which was driven since time of enlightment in Korea and 1945 in south Korea, has been reviewed. Writing reform has become since the time of enlightment when there have been a movement to use Korean characters, Hangeul instead of Chinese characters in official documents in Korea. However, it was difficult to use only Hangeul suddenly, therefore, we wrote mixing Korean and Chinese letters quite a while. Since 1945, Chinese characters abolition movement has risen up and the policy to use only Hangeul has strongly enforced twice in government too, use of Hangeul has been increased and recently we have arrived to the stage mainly using only Hangeul in our lives. While Hangeul becomes important, the work to realign Hangeul's orthography also became an urgent task. Since invention of Hangeul, we have mainly used phonemic orthography which is written in the sounding way, however an outstanding Korean linguist Ju Si-gyeong insisted morphophonemic orthography which writes words' constant form. The latter is the orthography adopted by Korea now, however there have been several disputes until it is settled. The third task of writing reform was to write Hangeul in released way. Hangeul has a few letters for consonants and vowels, however since it makes complete syllabic letter collecting these letters, the number of the syllabic letters are too many. Owing to this, there is inconvenience, so the insistence to use them not to collect but to release came out. The various measures were proposed, however this insistence was not admitted. As was shown, writing reform have been progressed with a lot of disputes for a long time on three issues, so the aspect of use of Hangeul in between enlightment period and now has been changed much.
참고문헌 (30)
- 강명관, "한문폐지론과 애국계몽기의 국·한문논쟁", 한국한문학연구, 8, pp.195~252 (1985)
- 김민수, "국어정책론" (1973), 고려대학교 출판부
- 김인선, "갑오경장 전후의 국문 한문 사용 논쟁-그 논의를 시작한 인물들을 중심으로", 새국어생활, 4(4), pp.155~167 (1994)
- 김정수, "한글 풀어쓰기 운동", 새국어생활, 18, pp.30~50 (1989)
- 김주필, "‘보통학교용 언문철자법(1912)’의 성격과 특징", 반교어문연구, (37), pp.37~70 (2014), 반교어문학회
- 김철, "복화술사-소설로 읽는 식민지 조선" (2008), 문학과지성사
- 김현정, "근대계몽기 국문 담론 양상과 언문일치", 어문연구, 60, pp.221~239 (2009), 어문연구학회
- 남궁원, "개화기 한문 및 한문교육에 대한 인식 일고", 한문고전연구, 13, pp.347~375 (2006)
- 송철의, "주 시경 선생의 표기법", 한글, (305), pp.105~134 (2014), 한글학회
- 신창순, "개화기 국어표기법의 전개와 검토", 어문연구실 편(1992)에 수록, 133~178 (1992)
- 안병곤, "한국의 한자정책과 한자교육", 일어교육, 18, pp.95~123 (2001)
- 국어표기법의 전개와 검토(1), "어문연구실", 한국정신문화연구원, ~ (1992)
- 윤석민, "일제시대 어문규범 정리과정에서 나타난 수용과 변천의 양상 -<언문철자법>과 <한글 맞춤법 통일안>을 중심으로-", 한국언어문학, (55), pp.51~72 (2005), 한국언어문학회
- 이군선, "朝鮮 士人의 言語文字 認識", 동방한문학, (33), pp.35~54 (2007), 동방한문학회
- 이기문, "개화기의 국문연구" (1970), 일조각
- 이기문, "주시경전집 상" (1976), 아세아문화사
- 이기문, "주시경전집 하" (1976), 아세아문화사
- 이병철, "근대 담론 형성과 국문운동 연구", 한국사상과 문화, (58), pp.99~125 (2011), 한국사상문화학회
- 이응호, "미 군정기의 한글 운동사" (1974), 성청사
- 이익섭, "한글의 모아쓰기 방식의 표의성에 대하여", 국어생활, 3, pp.16~31 (1985)
- 이인섭, "광복후 한글전용운동의 전개와 검토", 어문연구실 편(1992)에 수록, 279~316 (1992)
- 정승철, "일제강점기의 언어 정책 - ‘언문철자법’을 중심으로 -", 진단학보, (100), pp.221~262 (2005), 진단학회
- 정재환, "한글의 시대를 열다-해방 후 한글학회 활동 연구" (2013), 경인문화사
- 조남호, "중국 일본 베트남의 문자 정책", 담수, 43 (2014)
- 조성산, "18세기 후반~19세기 전반 조선 지식인의 語文 인식 경향", 한국문화, (47), pp.177~202 (2009), 규장각한국학연구원
- 최현배, "글자의 혁명" (1956), 정음사
- 한글학회, "한글 학회 50년사", 한글학회, ~ (1971)
- 허재영, "근대 계몽기의 어문 정책-『구한국 관보』를 중심으로", 국어교육연구, 10, pp.97~149 (2002)
- 허재영, "근대 계몽기의 어문 문제와 어문 운동의 흐름", 국어교육연구, 11, pp.457~490 (2003)
- 허재영, "근대계몽기의 어문 정책(1)-개화기 『한성순보(주보)』를 중심으로", 한민족문화연구, 14, pp.55~81 (2004)
