본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

韓國略字與簡化字的對比硏究試探 --以形成規律與字形爲中心

A comparative study on Korean & Chinese simpler form of Chinese characters

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류중국어와문학

초록

The purpose of this paper is to compare simplification rules and the resulting figure between Korean & Chinese simpler form of Chinese characters. At first We take a look at the history of the shape of a Chinese character`s simplification, to generate simplification rules. We introduce main opinions about the time when the traditional Chinese characters appear in Korean documentary records. and we induce the simplification rules based on simpler form now widely used. According to the analysis of this paper Korean & Chinese simpler form of Chinese characters appear the same pattern in general, that is to say often used characters which the number of strokes is large are mainly simplified. However, to Koreans Chinese characters are borrowed letters anyway, and it is not easy to reflect the changing pronunciations, so the simplification of the shape is mainly used. Through the comparative studies of the simpler form and simplification rules we ultimately need to seek the smooth communication within the Sinosphere by the unification of the Korea, China and Japan`s Chinese characters.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to compare simplification rules and the resulting figure between Korean & Chinese simpler form of Chinese characters. At first We take a look at the history of the shape of a Chinese character`s simplification, to generate simplification rules. We introduce main opinions about the time when the traditional Chinese characters appear in Korean documentary records. and we induce the simplification rules based on simpler form now widely used. According to the analysis of this paper Korean & Chinese simpler form of Chinese characters appear the same pattern in general, that is to say often used characters which the number of strokes is large are mainly simplified. However, to Koreans Chinese characters are borrowed letters anyway, and it is not easy to reflect the changing pronunciations, so the simplification of the shape is mainly used. Through the comparative studies of the simpler form and simplification rules we ultimately need to seek the smooth communication within the Sinosphere by the unification of the Korea, China and Japan`s Chinese characters.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. 陸錫興, "漢字傳播史" (2002), 語文出版社
  2. 金鍾壎, "韓國固有漢字硏究" (1983), 集文堂
  3. 柳東春, "中國語學槪論" (2008), 韓國放送通信大學校出版部
  4. 南基卓, "漢字와 생활언어" (2008), 한국어문교육연구원
  5. 金世一, "漢字古今中外多語語音比較字典" (1997), 西南師範大學出版社
  6. 國立國語硏究院, "東洋 三國의 略體字 比較 硏究" (1992), 國立國語硏究院
  7. 馬叔駿, "中日使用漢字之比較", 內蒙古大學學報, 2 (1994)
  8. 李永增, "中國漢字與日本漢字字形的同異", 天津外國語學院學報, 2 (1996)
  9. 遊衣明, "中日兩國漢字形體的比較硏究", 南京農業大學學報, 4 (2001)
  10. 林淸書, "中日漢字之比較", 龍巖師專學報, 1 (1995)
  11. 南廣祐, "韓國略字에 대하여", 語文硏究 通卷第, 39·40 (1983)
  12. 竇碩華, "日本漢字演進軌迹", 長春理工大學學報, 2 (2008)
  13. 羅衛東, "漢字在韓國·日本的傳播歷史及敎育槪況", 中央民族大學學報, 3 (2001)
  14. 張光軍, "韓國的漢字", 解放軍外國語學院學報, 5 (1999)
  15. 胡吉成, "關于簡化字問題的思考", 北京廣播電視大學學報, 2 (2002)
  16. 朴鐘錦, "漢語言文字的傳播及其對韓語言文字的影響", 北京第二外國語學院學報, 1 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)