현대중국어 ‘全’과 ‘都’의 의미기능 비교
Compare features of modern Chinese means ‘Quan’ and ‘Dou’
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The topic of this paper is semantic comparison of adverbs ‘dou’ and ‘quan’ in Modern Mandarin. ‘dou’ and ‘quan’ are the range adverbs in Modern Mandarin. These two adverbs always come immediately before the verb in order to have syntactic and semantic similarities. These two adverbs also have many differences between them as well. This paper is made up of three parts. Part one focuses on the study of ‘dou’ and ‘quan’s universal quantification meaning. T&T(2005) states that ‘quan’ imposes a maxim reading. but ‘dou’ does not impose this requirement. Part two focuses on the study of ‘dou’ and ‘quan’s collective reading and distributive reading. The sentence that contain ‘quan’ always has only a collective reading, but ‘dou’ has a collective reading and distributive reading. The “Mei…… dou” structure is word “Mei” and “Dou” represent universal quantification and distributive reading. Finally, this paper is a study of the ‘dou’ and ‘quan’'s event structure in Chinese through semantic requirements and properties. A sentence written included 'dou' mostly indicates mean of ‘telic’，‘change of state’, ‘achievement’, ‘attainment’.
Abstract
The topic of this paper is semantic comparison of adverbs ‘dou’ and ‘quan’ in Modern Mandarin. ‘dou’ and ‘quan’ are the range adverbs in Modern Mandarin. These two adverbs always come immediately before the verb in order to have syntactic and semantic similarities. These two adverbs also have many differences between them as well. This paper is made up of three parts. Part one focuses on the study of ‘dou’ and ‘quan’s universal quantification meaning. T&T(2005) states that ‘quan’ imposes a maxim reading. but ‘dou’ does not impose this requirement. Part two focuses on the study of ‘dou’ and ‘quan’s collective reading and distributive reading. The sentence that contain ‘quan’ always has only a collective reading, but ‘dou’ has a collective reading and distributive reading. The “Mei…… dou” structure is word “Mei” and “Dou” represent universal quantification and distributive reading. Finally, this paper is a study of the ‘dou’ and ‘quan’'s event structure in Chinese through semantic requirements and properties. A sentence written included 'dou' mostly indicates mean of ‘telic’，‘change of state’, ‘achievement’, ‘attainment’.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강범모, "양화와 복수의 의미론" (2014), 한국문화사
- 권선아, "都의 문법화 연구", 석사, pp.2010
- 宋恩政, "영어의 상(Aspect)에 관한 연구", 석사, 영어영문학, pp.1985
- 여훈근, "논리학" (1997), 대한교과서 주식회사
- 윤흥섭, "양화사 영향권 관계의 애매성", 영어영문학연구, 39 (1997)
- 이익환, "영어의미론" (2000), 한국문화사
- 전영철, "총칭성과 양화", 한국어 의미학, 39, pp.51~76 (2012), 한국어의미학회
- 주기하, "‘就’의 주관량(主觀量) 표기(標記) 기능 연구", 중국어문학지, (48), pp.397~421 (2014), 중국어문학회
- 진준화, "현대중국어 부사 “都”의 의미기능에 대한 인지적 접근", 중국언어연구, (32), pp.253~276 (2010), 한국중국언어학회
- 최규발, "현대 중국어 상(相) 표지의 부정", 중국인문과학, (34), pp.75~98 (2006), 중국인문학회
- 최규발, "현대 중국어 사건의 고정화와 상(aspect)", 중국학논총, 28(28), pp.1~23 (2010), 중국학연구소
- 홍소영, "현대중국어전칭양화사‘都’의의미기능연구", 석사, pp.2014
- 郭锐, "衍推和否定", 世界汉语教学, (2) (2006)
- 曹秀玲, "汉语全稱限定词及其句法表现", 语文研究, (4) (2006)
- 何宏华, "汉语量词辖域與逻辑式" (2007), 语文出版社
- 黄正德, "汉语句法学" (2013), 世界图书出版公司北京公司
- 黎锦熙, "新著国语文法" (1954), 商务印书官
- 蒋严, "形式语义学引论" (1998), 中国社会科学出版社
- 刘月华‧, "实用现代汉语语法(上), 实用现代汉语语法(下)" (2005), 송산출판사
- 刘丹青, "中国语文法论丛" (2013), 白帝社
- 呂叔湘, "现代汉语八百词" (2015), 商务印书官
- 潘海华, "语法研究與探索(精选集)" (2006), 中国语文出版社
- 王力, "中国现代语法" (1985), 商务印书官
- 王健, "‘全’, ‘都’和‘全都’", 殷都学刊, (3) (2008)
- 王丽香, "现代汉语“全都”类总括副词研究", 박사, pp.2013
- 徐烈炯, "‘都’是全稱量词吗?", 中国语文, (6) (2014)
- 原口庄辅中村, "촘스키 언어학 사전" (2003), 한신문화사
- 张蕾, "‘都’的语义要求和特征", 言语研究, (1) (2012)
- 张谊生, "范围副词‘都’的选择机制", 中国语文, (6) (2003)
- 周韧, "‘全’的整体性语义特徵及其句法後果", 中国语文, (2) (2001)
- Aoun, J, "Syntax of Scope" (1993), MIT Press
- Aoun, J, "Wh-in-situ:Syntax or LF?", inguistic Inquiry, 24, pp.199~238 (1993)
- Koopman, H., "Variables and the bijection principle", The Linguistic Review, 2, pp.139~160 (1982)
- Li, C.N, "표준중국어문법" (1996), 한울아카데미
- Lin，Jo-wang, "Distributivity in Chinese and its implications", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.201~243 (1998)
- Smith, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1991), Kluwer Academic
- Smith, "The Parameter of Aspect" (1997), Kluwer Academic
- Tomioka, S., "Domain restrictions for distributive quantification in Mandarin Chinese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 14(2), pp.89~120 (2005)
- Von Wright, G. H., "An essay in deontic logic and the general theory of action" (1968), Amsterdam