초점 현상 분석에 의한 통사구조, 정보 구조, 담화구조의 관련성 탐구
An exploration of the syntax-information-discoure interface based on the study of focus phenomena
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is proposed that the informational categories that have been traditionally referred to as topic, contrastive topic, and focus are defined in terms of twoinformational primitive features, {+-topical, +-focal}. Four possible informational categories, namely [+t, -f], [+t, +f], [-t, +f], and [-t,-f], are yielded from this binary feature system, which exhaustively categorize the informational status of each part of a sentence. An integrated analysis for the two categories, namely focus and focus frame that are defined as [-t, +f] and [-t, -f], respectively, is proposed, based on the semantic, syntactic, and discoursal considerations. This incorporates the semantic function of [+f] as the identificational predication and its corresponding syntactic structure interacting with the discourse context. The information conveyed by the category[-t, -f] is interpreted as having the widest scope among the four categories, which is accounted for by its anaphoric property licensed by the antecedent entailed in the previous context.
Abstract
It is proposed that the informational categories that have been traditionally referred to as topic, contrastive topic, and focus are defined in terms of twoinformational primitive features, {+-topical, +-focal}. Four possible informational categories, namely [+t, -f], [+t, +f], [-t, +f], and [-t,-f], are yielded from this binary feature system, which exhaustively categorize the informational status of each part of a sentence. An integrated analysis for the two categories, namely focus and focus frame that are defined as [-t, +f] and [-t, -f], respectively, is proposed, based on the semantic, syntactic, and discoursal considerations. This incorporates the semantic function of [+f] as the identificational predication and its corresponding syntactic structure interacting with the discourse context. The information conveyed by the category[-t, -f] is interpreted as having the widest scope among the four categories, which is accounted for by its anaphoric property licensed by the antecedent entailed in the previous context.
참고문헌 (35)
- Daniel, "IBM Working Papers of the Institute for Logic and Linguistics 2" (1994)
- Buering, D, "On D-Trees, Beans, and B-accents" (1999), UCSC. ms.
- "Conditions on Rules of Grammar", pp.303~51 (1976)
- E Kiss K, "Identificational Focus vs", 74, pp.245~273 (1998)
- English translations, "Uber Sinn und Bedeutung Translations from the Philosophical Writings f Gottlob Frege" (1982), Blackwell Publishers
- "The Semantic Analysis of the Nuclear Tones of English" (1983), Indiana University Linguistics Club
- Haegeman, L, "English grammar, a generative perspective" (1999), Blackwell
- Hajicova E,, "Topic-Focus Articulation, Tripartite Structures, Semantic Content" (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
- Heim E, "1983On the Projection Problem of for Presupposition", pp.114~2 25
- Jackendoff,Ray, "Semantics Interpretation in Generative Grammar" (1972)
- Kemp H, "From Discourse to Logic" (1993)
- Kartunnen,L, "Presupposition and Linguistic Context", 1, pp.181~94 (1974)
- Kadmon N., "Formal Pragmatics" (2001), Malden: Blackwell publishers
- Manfred, "A Compositional Semantics for Multiple Focus Constructions", pp.127~158 (1991)
- Lambrecht,K, "Information Structure and Sentence Form" (1994)
- Partee, "Proceedings of SALT 1" (1991), Cornell University
- Peregrin J, "Topic and Focus in a Formal Framework Papers in Honor of Eva Hajicova" (1995), John Benjamin
- Janet, "The Meaning of Intonation Contours in the in the Interpretation of Discourse Intentions in Communication", pp.271~311 (1990), MIT Press
- Roberts, Craige, "Information Structure in Discourse Towards an Integrated Formal Theory of Pragmatics" (1996), Ms. Ohio State University
- Rooth,Mats, "Association with Focus" (1985)
- Rooth, Mats, "Focus. The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory", pp.271~298 (1996), Blackwell, Oxford
- Schwarzschild, "GIVENness, Avoid F and other Constraints on the Placement of Accent", 7(2), pp.141~77 (1999)
- Rullman, H, "Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-Constructions University of Massachusetts" (1995)
- Selkirk, E, "Sentence Prosody: Intonation, Stress and Phrasing", pp.550~569 (1996), Gikdsmith, MA: Blackwell, Cambridge
- Stalnaker,R, "Presupposition", 2, pp.447~457 (1973)
- Steedman,Mark, "Structure and Intonation", 67, pp.260~296 (1991)
- Steedman, Mark, "The syntactic Process" (2000), Cambridge:MIT Press
- van der Sandt, "Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution Journal of Semantics 9", pp.333~377 (1992)
- Vallduvi,E, "The Informational Component" (1992), Garland Press
- Von Fintel,kai, "Restrictions on Quantifier Domains" (1994)
- Von Fintel, kai, "Semantics and Pragmatics of Contrastive Topic in Korean and English" (1998), CSLI
- Von Fintel, kai, "Definite Focus" (1999)
- Von Fintel, kai, "Sentential Logic, Discourse, and Pragmatics of Topic and Focus" (2001)
- Von Fintel, kai, "Function of Focus as Semantic Predicate", 4, pp.453~474 (2003)
- Zubizaretta, "Prosody, Focus and Word Order" (1998), Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press