유언을 뒤늦게 발견한 경우의 법률관계―유언등록부의 도입 필요성에 관하여―
A Legal Study on Will Found After Intestate Succession
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It is very important for an heir or interested parties to know the existence of a will. There is no system that enables the heir or interested parties to be aware of the existence of a will in Korean civil law. Thus, it is possible to find a will after proceeding an intestate succession without the awareness of the existence of a will for a long period of time. When an intestate succession is proceeded without knowing the existence of a will, a complex problem may occur in the case of ① period of filing an action of denial of paternity by will, ② comprehensive gift or real estate by will, ③specific gift by will, ④ designation of a method for division of succession, and ⑤ prohibition of division of succession. In this research, following conclusions are drawn. In legal theory, followings conclusion are suggested: necessity ① to limit a period of filing a denial of paternity to up to two years after the date a will was completed, ② to disable a request for the recovery of inheritance of a person who receives specific gift by will if comprehensive gift by will is found over 10 years after the death of the testator, ③ to oblige an executor of will to bear liability of compensation without fault by incurring original claim of family law in spite of the contractual effect of specific gift by will, ④ to acknowledge the effect of a partition by agreement for every heir when the partition is proceeded without knowing the designation of division of succession or prohibition on division of succession by will. Finally, legislatively, I proposed ① to allow transfer of an equal real right to specific gift by will as comprehensive gift by will, and ② to introduce a register of will. Besides, I also presented theory of legislation that establishes ③ the starting point of reckoning for denial of paternity by a will, ④ responsibility for impossibility of performance of specific gift by will, ⑤ force of a will to designate a method for division of succession, and ⑥ effect of partition by agreement against prohibition of division of succession in the civil code.
Abstract
It is very important for an heir or interested parties to know the existence of a will. There is no system that enables the heir or interested parties to be aware of the existence of a will in Korean civil law. Thus, it is possible to find a will after proceeding an intestate succession without the awareness of the existence of a will for a long period of time. When an intestate succession is proceeded without knowing the existence of a will, a complex problem may occur in the case of ① period of filing an action of denial of paternity by will, ② comprehensive gift or real estate by will, ③specific gift by will, ④ designation of a method for division of succession, and ⑤ prohibition of division of succession. In this research, following conclusions are drawn. In legal theory, followings conclusion are suggested: necessity ① to limit a period of filing a denial of paternity to up to two years after the date a will was completed, ② to disable a request for the recovery of inheritance of a person who receives specific gift by will if comprehensive gift by will is found over 10 years after the death of the testator, ③ to oblige an executor of will to bear liability of compensation without fault by incurring original claim of family law in spite of the contractual effect of specific gift by will, ④ to acknowledge the effect of a partition by agreement for every heir when the partition is proceeded without knowing the designation of division of succession or prohibition on division of succession by will. Finally, legislatively, I proposed ① to allow transfer of an equal real right to specific gift by will as comprehensive gift by will, and ② to introduce a register of will. Besides, I also presented theory of legislation that establishes ③ the starting point of reckoning for denial of paternity by a will, ④ responsibility for impossibility of performance of specific gift by will, ⑤ force of a will to designate a method for division of succession, and ⑥ effect of partition by agreement against prohibition of division of succession in the civil code.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김상훈, "미국상속법" (2012), 세창출판사
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2011), 법문사
- 김준호, "계약법" (2011), 법문사
- 박동섭, "친족상속법" (2012), 박영사
- 양창수, "계약법" (2010), 박영사
- 오시영, "친족상속법" (2011), 학현사
- 이경희, "가족법" (2012), 법원사
- 김현진, "프랑스민법상 유증", 민사법학, 59, pp.439~482 (2012), 한국민사법학회[DOI]
- 안영하, "일본의 상속시킨다는 취지의 유언에 대한 일고찰", 가족법연구, 21(1), pp.213~248 (2007), 한국가족법학회
- 정구태, "遺留分權利者의 承繼人의 範圍 - 包括的 遺贈의 法的 性質에 대한 從來 通說의 批判的 檢討 -", 안암법학, (28), pp.115~154 (2009), 안암법학회
- 현소혜, "유언의 보충적 해석", 가족법연구, 22(2), pp.111~150 (2008), 한국가족법학회
- 梶村太市, "家族法實務講義" (2013), 有斐閣
- 內田貴, "民法V 親族·相續(補正版)" (2007), 東京大學出版會
- 二宮周平, "家族法" (2009), 新世社
- 窪田充見, "家族法" (2011), 有斐閣
- 橋木昇二, "相續させる趣旨の遺言をめぐって", ケイス硏究, (232)
- 大場浩之, "相續させる趣旨の遺言による不動産の取得と登記", 早稻田法學, 80(4), 成文堂
- Brox, "Erbrecht", Vahlen
