유언방식의 개정방향
Reform Proposals for Testamentary Formalities in Korean Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Korean Civil Code knows five types of testamentary formality: holographic will, notarial will, secret will, emergency will by oral declaration and recorded will. A will which does not correspond to any of these forms is declared null and void (its article 1060, 1065). This formalism has in practice led to various conflicts, which have been settled by doctrine and case law. The discussions resulting from these experiences naturally ask the lawyers for a proper approach de lege ferenda. This article, based on doctrine and case law, assesses the Civil Code’s provisions about testamentary formalities in view of their policy concerns, comparatively takes other nations’ experiences into account and suggests the author’s proposals for a revision. This kind of theoretical analysis could be served as a groundwork in possible future reforms. At the same time, it is hoped to contribute to ongoing discussions in doctrine and practice by clarifying the meaning of the Civil Code provisons concerning testamentary formalities. In the article, legislative proposals for holographic will, notarial will and recorded will are to be submitted at length in this order. Following them, the minor subjects which also have to be dealt with in any revision process are addressed. A brief summary which sums the author’s key points is given at the end.
Abstract
The Korean Civil Code knows five types of testamentary formality: holographic will, notarial will, secret will, emergency will by oral declaration and recorded will. A will which does not correspond to any of these forms is declared null and void (its article 1060, 1065). This formalism has in practice led to various conflicts, which have been settled by doctrine and case law. The discussions resulting from these experiences naturally ask the lawyers for a proper approach de lege ferenda. This article, based on doctrine and case law, assesses the Civil Code’s provisions about testamentary formalities in view of their policy concerns, comparatively takes other nations’ experiences into account and suggests the author’s proposals for a revision. This kind of theoretical analysis could be served as a groundwork in possible future reforms. At the same time, it is hoped to contribute to ongoing discussions in doctrine and practice by clarifying the meaning of the Civil Code provisons concerning testamentary formalities. In the article, legislative proposals for holographic will, notarial will and recorded will are to be submitted at length in this order. Following them, the minor subjects which also have to be dealt with in any revision process are addressed. A brief summary which sums the author’s key points is given at the end.
참고문헌 (41)
- 곽윤직, "채권각론" (2003)
- 곽윤직, "상속법" (2004)
- 권순한, "사인증여의 방식과 효력", 판례월보, (324) (1997)
- 김주수, "친족·상속법" (2018)
- 김영희, "자필증서유언방식에 관한 제문제", 가족법연구, 17(2), pp.9~298 (2003), 한국가족법학회
- 김영희, "현행민법상 유언의 방식에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 20(2), pp.117~160 (2006), 한국가족법학회
- 김형배, (2001)
- 김형석, "우리 상속법의 비교법적 위치", 가족법연구, 23(2), pp.75~126 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- 김형석, "유언의 성립과 효력에 관한 몇 가지 문제", 민사판례연구, (38), pp.1017~1123 (2016), 민사판례연구회
- 민의원 법제사법위원회 민법안심의소위원회, "민법안심의록, 하권" (1957)
- 송덕수, "친족상속법" (2018)
- 윤진수, "상속제도의 헌법적 근거", 민법논고, V (2011)
- 윤진수, "친족상속법 강의" (2018)
- 이경희, "가족법" (2017)
- 정광현, "한국가족법연구", ~ (1967)
- 조인섭, "자필증서유언의 개선방안", 가족법연구, 30(3), pp.237~320 (2016), 한국가족법학회
- 현소혜, "유언방식의 개선방향에 관한 연구", 가족법연구, 23(2), pp.1~52 (2009), 한국가족법학회
- Breitschmid, "Formvorschriften im Testamentsrecht" (1982)
- Grundmann, "Favor Testamenti", Archiv für die civilistische Praxis, 187, pp.429~ (1987)
- von Hippel, "Formalismus und Rechtsdogmatik" (1935)
- Hiram, "The Scots Law of Succession" (2007)
- Kipp, "Erbrecht, 14. Bearbeitung" (1990)
- Lange, "Das Recht des Testamentes" (1937)
- Lange, "Erbrecht" (2001)
- Malaurie, "Les successions, les libéralités" (2014)
- "Münchener Kommentar zum BGB , Band 10" (2017)
- Otte, "Europäische Testamentsformen" (2011)
- "Nomos Kommentar zum BGB , Band 5: Erbrecht" (2018)
- Palandt, "Bürgerliches Gesetzbcuh" (2018)
- Plutarch, "Plutarch’s Lives, Vol. II" (1968)
- Reid, de Waal, "Comparative Succession Law, Vol. I: Testamentary Formalities" (2011)
- Röthel, "Ist unser Erbrecht zeitgemäß? (Gutachten zum 68)" (2010), DJT
- Röthel, "Das holographische Testament" (2015)
- Schmoeckel, "Das holographische Testament" (2015)
- Schömmer, "Internationales Erbecht Niederlande" (2010)
- Schubert, "Die Vorentwürfe der Redaktoren zum BGB, Erbrecht Teil 1" (1984)
- Thrush, "At issue in Florida tally: Voters’ penmanship", The New York Times International Edition, ~ (2018)
- Zimmermann, "Comparative Succession Law, Vol. I: Testamentary Formalities" (2011)
- 商事法務, "民法(相續關係)等の改正に關する中間試案" (2016)
- 羽生香織, "遺言制度の關する見直し", 論究ジュリスト, (20) (2017)
- 沖野眞已, "對談 相續法の改正をめぐって", ジュリスト, (1526) (2018)