본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

증여계약서와 사실실험공증에 의한 유언제도의 형해화 —미국 유언법상 부당한 영향 이론의 활용 가능성—

Failure of Wills System by Donation Agreement and Notarization of Fact —Possibility of Utilizing the Undue Influence Theory according to Wills Law of the USA—

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

In the United States, a testament, if a confidential relationship and suspicious circumstances exist in the testament so that an undue influence can be assumed, is considered to be invalid even though the written testament fulfills all the strict formality requirements. However, the personal opinion of the author of this paper is that a disposition document should be considered as an actual will so that it should be valid if it fulfills the due formality requirements but be invalid if it does not meet the formality requirements after a careful examination rather than just nullifying the disposition document which is assumed to be written under an undue influence. This is an interpretation to respect the concerned parties. Eventually, the author of this paper came to a conclusion that in case that the inheritee disposed the inheritance properties by menas of a donation agreement rather than a testament, two level examination methods should be adopted as the basis for determining the validity of the disposition document. That is, the first level is to determine whether there exist special situation to consider the donation agreement as a testament (confidential relationship and suspicious circumstances) or not in the testament, and if the special situations exist, the second level is to determine whether the disposition document meets the formality requirements of a testament or not. The reason of this assertion is to achieve the objective of wills system and to lead the concerned parties to write a testament which meets the formality requirements of a testament.

Abstract

In the United States, a testament, if a confidential relationship and suspicious circumstances exist in the testament so that an undue influence can be assumed, is considered to be invalid even though the written testament fulfills all the strict formality requirements. However, the personal opinion of the author of this paper is that a disposition document should be considered as an actual will so that it should be valid if it fulfills the due formality requirements but be invalid if it does not meet the formality requirements after a careful examination rather than just nullifying the disposition document which is assumed to be written under an undue influence. This is an interpretation to respect the concerned parties. Eventually, the author of this paper came to a conclusion that in case that the inheritee disposed the inheritance properties by menas of a donation agreement rather than a testament, two level examination methods should be adopted as the basis for determining the validity of the disposition document. That is, the first level is to determine whether there exist special situation to consider the donation agreement as a testament (confidential relationship and suspicious circumstances) or not in the testament, and if the special situations exist, the second level is to determine whether the disposition document meets the formality requirements of a testament or not. The reason of this assertion is to achieve the objective of wills system and to lead the concerned parties to write a testament which meets the formality requirements of a testament.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김상훈, "미국상속법(American Wills and Trusts)" (2012), 세창출판사
  2. 신영호, "인류혼인사" (2013), 세창출판사
  3. 이상도, "법률영어사전" (2002), 청림출판
  4. 장재형, "사실실험공정증서에 관한 소고", 법조, 57(10), pp.161~207 (2008), 법조협회
  5. D. Kelly Weisberg, "CALIFORNIA Probate Code and Related Provisions with Commentary" (2010), Aspen
  6. Dennis R. Hower, "WILLS, TRUSTS, AND ESTATE ADMINISTRATION" (2008), Delmar
  7. Elias Clark, "GRATUITOUS TRANSFERS" (2007), Thomson West
  8. Gordon Brown, "ADMINISTRATION OF WILLS, TRUSTS AND ESTATES" (2009), Delmar
  9. Jesse Dukeminier, "WILLS, TRUSTS AND ESTATES" (2005), Aspen
  10. Lawrence W. Waggoner, "FAMILY PROPERTY LAW" (2006), Foundation Press
  11. Ray D. Madoff, "Unmasking Undue Influence", Minnesota Law Review, 81 (1997)
  12. Robert Pearce, "THE LAW OF TRUSTS AND EQUITABLE OBLIGATIONS" (2006), Oxford University Press
  13. William M. McGovern Jr., "WILLS, TURSTS AND ESTATES" (2004), Thomson West

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)