본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Understanding students’ affective responses and their influence of written feedback

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study attempts to examine and provide a configuration of the complex relationship between EFL college students’ affective response and instructor written feedback. In doing so, the study specifically examines a) how certain affective responses inform students’ successful negotiation of written feedback in their writing, b) the correlation between students’ affective responses and types of written feedback received and c) variations of affective responses towards written feedback across students. Primary data included think-aloud sessions and semi-structured interviews. Students’ texts were also collected but used as reference points to clarify the primary data. Grounded theory was used to examine how students negotiate the received written feedback through semi-structured interviews and think-aloud sessions. Relying on Ferris & Hedgcock (1998), a code scheme was used to organize and classify the instructor feedback. Findings showed that EFL students felt satisfied, irritated, dismayed, dissatisfied, delighted, shocked, and showed refusal of feedback and agreement with feedback as part of their affective responses. While a single factor does not contribute to these responses, miscommunication and misunderstanding between the instructor and students, discouraging criticism, and negative comments from instructors were seen as notable factors. The research also showed that students’ affective responses may influence students’ tolerance and appropriation of instructor feedback.

Abstract

This study attempts to examine and provide a configuration of the complex relationship between EFL college students’ affective response and instructor written feedback. In doing so, the study specifically examines a) how certain affective responses inform students’ successful negotiation of written feedback in their writing, b) the correlation between students’ affective responses and types of written feedback received and c) variations of affective responses towards written feedback across students. Primary data included think-aloud sessions and semi-structured interviews. Students’ texts were also collected but used as reference points to clarify the primary data. Grounded theory was used to examine how students negotiate the received written feedback through semi-structured interviews and think-aloud sessions. Relying on Ferris & Hedgcock (1998), a code scheme was used to organize and classify the instructor feedback. Findings showed that EFL students felt satisfied, irritated, dismayed, dissatisfied, delighted, shocked, and showed refusal of feedback and agreement with feedback as part of their affective responses. While a single factor does not contribute to these responses, miscommunication and misunderstanding between the instructor and students, discouraging criticism, and negative comments from instructors were seen as notable factors. The research also showed that students’ affective responses may influence students’ tolerance and appropriation of instructor feedback.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. Atkinson, D., "Second language writing research: perspectives on the process of knowledge construction", pp.49~64 (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum
  2. Rodrigo Aragão, "Beliefs and emotions in foreign language learning", System, 39(3), pp.302~313 (2011), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Barret, L. F., "The psychological construction of emotion" (2015), Guilford Press
  4. Bartlett, E., "What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse", pp.55~64 (1982), Emerald Group
  5. Bawarshi, A. S., "Genre and invention of the writer : Reconsidering the place of invention in composition" (2003), Utah State University Press
  6. Black, P., "Assessment for learning : Putting it into practice" (2003), Open University Press
  7. Cohen, J., "Weighted kappa : Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit", Psychological Bulletin, 70(4), pp.213~220 (1968)
  8. Daiker, D. A., "The teacher’s options in responding to student writing", Paper presented at the annual conference on college composition and communication (1983)
  9. Fathman, A. K., "Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom", pp.178~190 (1999), Cambridge University Press
  10. Peter Ferguson, "Student perceptions of quality feedback in teacher education", Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(1), pp.51~62 (2011), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
  11. Ferris, D., "Teaching ESL composition : Purpose, process, and practice" (1998), Lawrence Erlbaum
  12. Ferris. D., "Treatment of error in second language writing classes" (2002), University of Michigan Press
  13. Linda Flower, "A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing", College Composition and Communication, 32(4), pp.365~ (1981), JSTOR[DOI]
  14. Flowerdew, J., "Discipline-specific writing : Theory and practice" (2016), Routledge
  15. Glaser, B., "The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research", pp.101~116 (1967), Aldine
  16. Lynn M. Goldstein, "Student Input and Negotiation of Meaning in ESL Writing Conferences", TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), pp.443~ (1990), JSTOR[DOI]
  17. Kathy L. Guthrie, "Teaching and Learning: Using Experiential Learning and Reflection for Leadership Education", New Directions for Student Services, 2012(140), pp.53~63 (2012), Wiley[DOI]
  18. Hillocks, G., "The interaction of instruction, teacher comment, and revision in teaching the composing process", Research in the Teaching of English, 16(3), pp.261~278 (1982)
  19. Harris, L. R., "Exploring the content of teachers’ feedback: What are teachers actually providing to students?", Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting (2013)
  20. Eleanor M. Hawe, "Building students’ evaluative and productive expertise in the writing classroom", Assessing Writing, 19, pp.66~79 (2014), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  21. Hyland, F., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.206~224 (2006), Cambridge University Press
  22. Ken Hyland, "Student perceptions of hidden messages in teacher written feedback", Studies in Educational Evaluation, 39(3), pp.180~187 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  23. Kalat, J. W., "Introduction to psychology" (2014), Cengage Learning
  24. Kietlinska, K., "Revision: History, theory, and practice", pp.63~87 (2006), Parlor Press
  25. Krosnick, J. A., "Encyclopedia of human behavior" (1994), Academic Press
  26. practice divide, "Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education : Vygotskian praxis and the theory", pp.2014, Lantolf, J. P.
  27. Icy Lee, "Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(3), pp.144~164 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  28. Lichtman, M., "Qualitative research for the social sciences" (2014), Sage
  29. Lipnevich, A. A., "The effects of differential feedback on students’ performance" (2008), Educational Testing Service
  30. McDonald W. U., "The revising process and the marking of student papers", College Composition and Communication, 24, pp.167~180 (1978)[DOI]
  31. Merriam, S. B., "Qualitative research : A guide to design and implementation" (2009), Jossey-Bass
  32. Miles, M. B., "Qualitative data analysis : An expanded sourcebook" (1994), Sage
  33. Hui-Tzu Min, "A case study of an EFL writing teacher's belief and practice about written feedback", System, 41(3), pp.625~638 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  34. Joy Reid, "Responding to ESL Students' Texts: The Myths of Appropriation", TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), pp.273~ (1994), JSTOR[DOI]
  35. Rollinson, P., "Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class", ELT Journal, 59(1), pp.23~30 (2005)[DOI]
  36. Ryoo, Mi., "The effects of teacher feedback on EFL students' writing in a Korean University class", The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 1(1), pp.115~130 (2004)
  37. Strauss, A., "The sage handbook of qualitative research", pp.273~284 (2011), Sage
  38. Swain M., "Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning", pp.112~130 (2010), Oxford University Press
  39. Yasser Teimouri, "L2 SELVES, EMOTIONS, AND MOTIVATED BEHAVIORS", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(04), pp.681~709 (2017), Cambridge University Press (CUP)[DOI]
  40. Vygotsky, L. S., "Thought and language" (1962), The M. I. T. Press
  41. Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind and society : The development of higher mental processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
  42. White, C., "Agency and emotion in narrative accounts of emergent conflict in an L2 classroom", Applied Linguistics, 39(4), pp.579~598 (2018)[DOI]
  43. Huahui Zhao, "Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom", Assessing Writing, 15(1), pp.3~17 (2010), Elsevier BV[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)