본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

가정폭력에 대한 경찰의 개입과 그 한계

Police Power Responding to Domestic Violence

0

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

Domestic violence is no longer a matter confined to households, but has become a serious social problem. The Korean legislature enacted the Act on the Punishment of Domestic Violence and the Act on the Prevention of Domestic Violence in 1997. From that time on domestic violence has been declared as a crime, and the offenders has to encounter sanction and/or punishment by the governmental authority. According to the 2013 Korea National Survey of Domestic Violence the rate of spousal abuse amounts to 45.5%, and 7.3% of respondents reports physical abuse, 37.2% emotional abuse, 5.3% economical abuse, 5.4% sexual abuse, 27.3% neglect. The rate of child abuse is 46.1%, and 10.3% of elders has suffered domestic violence. The domestic violence offender are subjected to either criminal penalty or protective measure by way of dual process, in which the prosecutor has the initiative to select a process leading to final adjudication. But the police takes the most important role to punish offenders and protect victims especially at the early stage of handling domestic violence cases. Police officers are obliged to team up with a professional counselor and rush to the scene whenever they receive calls on domestic violence. The police has a duty to stop violent acts and separate aggressor from victim as emergency measures. And the police may enter domiciles without permission for the purpose of an on-the-spot inspection. Futhermore the police is capable of imposing exigent provisional measures such a an order to remove and exclude the offender from the residence of the victim, an order to enjoin the offender from contacting with the victim around home and office, or an order to prohibit the offender from communicating with the victim electronically. Recently a new proposal to empower the police to detain a domestic violence offender who disobey exigent provisional measures has turned up. It puts emphasis on strengthening police responding against domestic violence, especially to ensure the safety of the victim. Actually breaches of provisional measures by the prosecutor are subject to administrative fine not exceeding 5 million won, and protective measure by the court is considered a criminal crime punishable with imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or fine not exceeding 30 million won. Already on-the-spot inspection / access and exigent provisional measures are available to police officers in relation to responding domestic violence. And the police officer can arrest the offender without warrant in the name of present culprit arrest or urgent arrest. It may be unnecessary and unconstitutional to allow the police to detain the domestic violence offender without the control of the prosecutor as an administrative enforcement only with the post-arrest warrant by the judge.

Abstract

Domestic violence is no longer a matter confined to households, but has become a serious social problem. The Korean legislature enacted the Act on the Punishment of Domestic Violence and the Act on the Prevention of Domestic Violence in 1997. From that time on domestic violence has been declared as a crime, and the offenders has to encounter sanction and/or punishment by the governmental authority. According to the 2013 Korea National Survey of Domestic Violence the rate of spousal abuse amounts to 45.5%, and 7.3% of respondents reports physical abuse, 37.2% emotional abuse, 5.3% economical abuse, 5.4% sexual abuse, 27.3% neglect. The rate of child abuse is 46.1%, and 10.3% of elders has suffered domestic violence. The domestic violence offender are subjected to either criminal penalty or protective measure by way of dual process, in which the prosecutor has the initiative to select a process leading to final adjudication. But the police takes the most important role to punish offenders and protect victims especially at the early stage of handling domestic violence cases. Police officers are obliged to team up with a professional counselor and rush to the scene whenever they receive calls on domestic violence. The police has a duty to stop violent acts and separate aggressor from victim as emergency measures. And the police may enter domiciles without permission for the purpose of an on-the-spot inspection. Futhermore the police is capable of imposing exigent provisional measures such a an order to remove and exclude the offender from the residence of the victim, an order to enjoin the offender from contacting with the victim around home and office, or an order to prohibit the offender from communicating with the victim electronically. Recently a new proposal to empower the police to detain a domestic violence offender who disobey exigent provisional measures has turned up. It puts emphasis on strengthening police responding against domestic violence, especially to ensure the safety of the victim. Actually breaches of provisional measures by the prosecutor are subject to administrative fine not exceeding 5 million won, and protective measure by the court is considered a criminal crime punishable with imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or fine not exceeding 30 million won. Already on-the-spot inspection / access and exigent provisional measures are available to police officers in relation to responding domestic violence. And the police officer can arrest the offender without warrant in the name of present culprit arrest or urgent arrest. It may be unnecessary and unconstitutional to allow the police to detain the domestic violence offender without the control of the prosecutor as an administrative enforcement only with the post-arrest warrant by the judge.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. 김은경, "소송과정에서의 가정폭력 피해자 보호현황과 쟁점들", 형사정책연구, 17(4), pp.255~296 (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
  2. 김은경, "가정폭력범죄의 형사절차상 위기개입방안 연구" (2001), 한국형사정책연구원
  3. 김재민, "가정폭력 피해자 신변안전확보 과정에서의 수사경찰의 위험성 평가에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(2), pp.327~357 (2006), 한국피해자학회
  4. 김재민, "가정폭력에의 효과적 위기개입을 위한 제도적 개선책 연구 - 가정폭력 피해자에 대한 경찰 위기개입을 중심으로", 경찰학연구, 6(3), pp.9~35 (2006), 경찰대학
  5. 김재민, "경찰의 가정폭력 대응과 피해자보호", 경찰법연구, 11(1), pp.33~58 (2013), 한국경찰법학회
  6. 박미숙, "가정폭력관련법률의 효율성 제고방안", 형사정책연구, 12(1) (2001)
  7. 성홍재, "가정폭력 가해자에 대한 경찰의 보호조치권 신설의 입법적 검토", 경찰법연구, 9(2), pp.113~143 (2011), 한국경찰법학회
  8. 성홍재, "경찰의 긴급임시조치권과 검사의 지휘권에 대한 법적 검토 - 가정폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 일부 개정안을 중심으로 -", 경찰학연구, 11(3), pp.3~27 (2011), 경찰대학
  9. 이성용, "가정폭력 법제에 관한 비판적 고찰- 경찰법적 측면에서 -", 경찰법연구, 11(2), pp.41~63 (2013), 한국경찰법학회
  10. 이성용, "가정폭력에 대한 경찰권 발동에 관한 고찰 - 한국과 독일을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 18(1), pp.277~310 (2007), 한국형사정책연구원
  11. 이호중, "가정폭력범죄의 처벌에 관한 특례법 10년의 평가: 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책연구, 19(3), pp.127~170 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
  12. 주명희, "가정폭력 사건에 대한 경찰의 인식에 관한 연구: 체포 강제 제도 도입과 관련하여", 여성연구, 2(71) (2006), 한국여성정책연구원
  13. 최병각, "가정폭력사범 처벌에 관한 비교법적 고찰과 개선방안", 법무부, 형사법 개정 연구 자료집, IV, ~ (2011)
  14. 한인섭, "가정폭력법에 대한 법정책적 검토", 피해자학연구, (7) (1999)
  15. Clark, Paul A., "Mandatory Arrest for Misdemeanor Domestic Violence : Is Alaska’s Arrest Statute Constitutional?", Alaska Law Review, 27(151) (2010)
  16. Dayton, Jessica, "The Silencing of a Woman’s Choice: Mandatory Arrest and No Drop Prosecution Policies in Domestic Violence Cases", Cardozo Women’s Law Journal, 9(281) (2003)
  17. Innenministerium des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen, "Häusliche Gewalt und polizeiliches Handel", ~ (2007)
  18. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, "Model Code on Domestic and Family Violence", ~ (1994)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)