본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일반농산어촌개발사업이 농촌 지역주민 삶의 질에 미치는 영향

Study on the Effect of the Rural Development Projects on the Quality of Life for Residents in Rural Areas

김영하|박준규|김민수
한국농촌계획학회 (Korean Society Of Rural Planning)|2017.11|농촌계획 (Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning)|제23권 제4호|pp. 75-90|DOI Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.7851/Ksrp.2017.23.4.075

2

조회

0

다운로드

13

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Quality of LifeRural DevelopmentPerception Factors
주제분류농학

초록

The study was intended to identify the effect of the rural development projects (comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon and regional unit comprehensive development projects) on the quality of life in rural areas against local residents living in areas subject to those projects by means of structural equation modeling based on covariance structure analysis. The result indicated that perception factors affecting the quality of life for residents in rural areas by the projects included ‘improvement in spatial environment’, ‘increase in vitality of rural areas’, and ‘promotion of community activities.’ It was also suggested that ‘improvement in spatial environment’ and ‘increase in vitality of rural areas’ have significantly positive effect on the quality of life for residents in rural areas while the former has relatively higher correlation. In comparison between comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon and regional unit comprehensive development projects, it was analyzed that all the perception factors of the comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon have effect on the quality of life for residents in rural areas indicating that comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon is more effective than regional unit comprehensive development projects in promoting the community activities. It means that existing rural development projects have been promoted to improve spatial environment rather than improving the quality of life for residents in rural areas. Thus, it is considered that the rural development projects in future should seek for a sense of community so that they can induce voluntary participation by local residents.

Abstract

The study was intended to identify the effect of the rural development projects (comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon and regional unit comprehensive development projects) on the quality of life in rural areas against local residents living in areas subject to those projects by means of structural equation modeling based on covariance structure analysis. The result indicated that perception factors affecting the quality of life for residents in rural areas by the projects included ‘improvement in spatial environment’, ‘increase in vitality of rural areas’, and ‘promotion of community activities.’ It was also suggested that ‘improvement in spatial environment’ and ‘increase in vitality of rural areas’ have significantly positive effect on the quality of life for residents in rural areas while the former has relatively higher correlation. In comparison between comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon and regional unit comprehensive development projects, it was analyzed that all the perception factors of the comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon have effect on the quality of life for residents in rural areas indicating that comprehensive improvement of the seats of Eup and Myeon is more effective than regional unit comprehensive development projects in promoting the community activities. It means that existing rural development projects have been promoted to improve spatial environment rather than improving the quality of life for residents in rural areas. Thus, it is considered that the rural development projects in future should seek for a sense of community so that they can induce voluntary participation by local residents.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. 안상유, "농촌지역 마을만들기의 주민만족도 영향요인에 관한 연구 : 농촌마을종합개발사업 중심으로", 박사, 행정학과, pp.2013
  2. 안중호, "농촌마을 종합개발사업의 주민 만족도 영향 분석", 박사, 도시개발경영학과 도시개발경영전공, pp.2013
  3. Campbell, A. P. E. Converse, "The Quality of American Life:Perceptions, Evaluation, and Satisfaction", pp.217~314 (1976), Russell Sage Eoundation
  4. Center for Agricultural Policy Evaluation of Korea Rural Economic Institute, "2016 Support Business Monitoring : the Rural Development", KREI Scenc Brief, 2, pp.1~13 (2016)
  5. Chae, J. H, "Analysis on the Economic Accomplishment and Spill-Over Effect of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project", Doctor, pp.2010
  6. 조진상, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 성과 및 문제점 분석-구례 방광권역 주민소득사업을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 15(4), pp.109~124 (2009), 한국농촌계획학회
  7. 한경수, "농촌마을종합개발사업 중간 점검을 위한 평가지표 적용 사례", 농촌계획, 13(2), pp.121~132 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
  8. 허주열, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 주민참여 특성에 관한 연구 - 경상북도 농촌마을종합개발사업지구를 중심으로 -", 한국지역개발학회지, 21(3), pp.45~70 (2009), 한국지역개발학회
  9. Ji, K. B, "A Study on the QOL of the Gangwon-do Residents-Based on a Comparative Analysis of the Subjective Consciousness and Objective Index-", Gangwon collection of treatises, 1, pp.139~158 (2010)
  10. Jin, E. J, "An Analysis on the Master Plan of Comprehensive Rural Village Development Project in Gyeongnam Province", Master, pp.2014
  11. Joo, D. J, "Exploring Methodologies for Facilitating Residents' Participation at Comprehensive Rural Village Development Projects in Korea", Journal of Agricultural Extension &Community Development, 11(2), pp.303~320 (2004)
  12. 주신하, "농촌경관의 보전‧형성‧관리를 위한 정책제안 연구", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.77~86 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
  13. 정명희, "농촌마을종합개발사업 권역 주민들의 참여도와 활성화방안 연구 -전남농촌마을을 중심으로-", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 13(3), pp.45~52 (2011), 한국농촌건축학회
  14. 김대식, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 기본계획 사업비 특성분석", 농촌계획, 17(1), pp.13~27 (2011), 한국농촌계획학회
  15. 김은정, "읍·면 소재지 종합정비사업 평가지표 체계의 개선방안 -기존 소도읍 육성 사업의 평가지표 체계 분석을 바탕으로-", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 14(1), pp.45~56 (2012), 한국농촌건축학회
  16. 김혜천, "삶의 질 측면에서 본 우리나라 공공개발사업의 평가", 도시행정학보, 19(3), pp.23~42 (2006), 한국도시행정학회
  17. 김경량, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 효율적 추진을 위한 중간평가체계 개발", 농촌계획, 12(2), pp.65~73 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
  18. 김강섭, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 개선방안 연구", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 11(4), pp.59~66 (2009), 한국농촌건축학회
  19. A Study on Indicators for Kyonggi-Do People's Quality of Life, "Kim, J. G", Gyeonggi Research Institute, ~ (2001)
  20. 김재원, "농촌마을종합개발사업에 있어 주민참여 실태와 성과에 관한 연구 - 전남농촌마을을 중심으로 -", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 19(1), pp.11~22 (2017), 한국농촌건축학회
  21. A Study on the Quality of Life and Its Improvement in Rural Gangwon-do, "Kim, J. W", Gangwon Development Research Institute, ~ (2006)
  22. 김명룡, "농촌전통테마마을의 활성화 방안에 관한 연구: 완주 디지털 산내골을 중심으로", 농촌지도와 개발, 15(3), pp.499~531 (2008), 한국농촌지도학회
  23. Kim, Y. T, "Development of Operation", Management Program for Rural Community Facilities, Graduate School Chonnam National University, 2008
  24. Lai, T. L, "Linear rank statistics in regression analysis with censored or truncated data", Journal Of Multivariate Statistics, pp.13~45 (1992)
  25. 이해진, "농촌지역개발사업 성과의 차이와 농촌사회 발전에 대한 함의", 농촌사회, 22(2), pp.7~48 (2012), 한국농촌사회학회
  26. Lee, J. H, "An Analysis of Comprehensive Rural Clustered Community Development Program about Types of Rural Community", Master, pp.2008
  27. 이재준, "지속가능한 농촌발전을 위한 주민참여 요인분석에 관한 연구", 국토계획, 38(3), pp.39~55 (2003), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  28. Lee, J. Y, "A Study on the Evaluation Indicator for Rural Development Project of Local Government in Korea", Doctor, pp.2011
  29. 이상호, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 성과분석", 동북아관광연구, 7(1), pp.177~195 (2011), 동북아관광학회
  30. 이연택, "국가관광정책에 있어서 지역주민참여에 관한 연구:정책과제 도출", 관광학연구, 28(3), pp.143~160 (2004), 한국관광학회
  31. 이주용, "포괄보조금제도하에서 효율적인 농어촌지역개발을 위한 사업평가지표 연구", 한국농공학회논문집, 53(1), pp.57~62 (2011), 한국농공학회
  32. A Study on the Activation Plan of Complete Region in Rural Development Project, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs", Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 1~21 (2014)
  33. Olsen, Marvin E, "Toward a Methodology for Conducting Social Impact Assessments Using Quality of Life Indicators", ~ (1977)
  34. A Study on the Measurement of Quality of Life in Rural Area, "Park, D. S", Korea Rural Economic Institute, ~ (2002)
  35. 박대식, "도시와 농촌 주민의 삶의 질 지수화 방안 연구", 농촌경제, 30(4), pp.31~55 (2007), 한국농촌경제연구원
  36. 박한식, "농촌마을종합개발사업 내용분석과 시사점- ‘04-‘07년 사업대상지 사업을 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.121~128 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
  37. Park, S. J, "A study on the Problems and Improvement at the Operation and Management Phase of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Projects(CRVDPs)-In Case of 5 CRVDPs in Jeonnam Province", Master, pp.2013
  38. Park, Y. S, "The Influence of Social Capital to Residents' Integration and Quality of Life in Rural Tourism Village", Doctor, pp.2009
  39. Multivariate Statistical Analysis of the Data by SPSS, "Roh, H. J", Hyosan, ~ (2007)
  40. AMOS, "Statistical analysis using the easy-to-understand SPSS", pp.2014, Seong, T. J
  41. Sohn, S. Y, "A Model construction of the quality of life in the rural elderly", Doctor, pp.2005
  42. Woo, J. P, "Structural equation modeling concepts and understanding of woojongpil professor" (2012), hannarae

관련 논문AI추천

읍‧면 소재지 종합정비사업의 성과경로 분석김정태, 정남수한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2019 · 제25권 제2호농촌지역 마을개발 사업에 대한 주민 인식도 조사- 일반 농산어촌개발사업의 읍․면소재지 종합정비를 대상으로 -김윤학, 김정규한국농촌건축학회 · 한국농촌건축학회논문집2014 · 제16권 제4호농촌 삶의 질 영향 요인의 인과구조 분석최강화한국농촌경제연구원 · 농촌경제2012 · 제35권 제1호농촌주민의 중심지활성화 사업에 대한 효과인식김정태한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2017 · 제23권 제4호농촌활성화사업 마을주민의 사업참여도와 마을 환경변화에 대한 만족도박경옥, 이하나한국농촌건축학회 · 한국농촌건축학회논문집2009 · 제11권 제1호농촌개발사업에서 차별화가 갖는 의미와 주민평가에 주는 함의김정태한국농촌계획학회 · 농촌계획2015 · 제21권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

Study on the significant influence of capacity building toward the livelihood assets of ethnic minority Villages in the northern part of VietnamNguyen Thi Minh Hien, 김선호pp. 1-13농촌주민의 중심지활성화 사업에 대한 효과인식김정태pp. 15-26농촌지역 시설원예단지 경관선호도 분석 연구 - 한국, 네덜란드, 일본을 대상으로 -공민재, 신지훈, 신민지, 손진관, 윤성욱, 이시영, 강동현pp. 27-38액비 및 유기농법 적용에 따른 농경지에서의 오염부하 원단위 평가장태일, 홍승길, 소현철pp. 39-48만다라트(Mandal-Art) 기법을 이용한 웹기반 농업용수 정보시스템 평가지표 개발김찬우, 김정대, 박진선, 김솔희, 정찬훈, 서교pp. 49-59
원문 보기