농촌개발사업에서 차별화가 갖는 의미와 주민평가에 주는 함의
The Meaning of Differentiation in Rural Development Projects and Its Implications on Resident Assessment
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In empirical studies on rural development projects, differentiation tends to be considered a strategy aimed at increasing the number of visitors. Rural development projects include the improvement of living environment, and the discussion about project goals and evaluation of project results are often focused on the aspect of rural tourism. Thus, subjective benefits of such projects for residents are omitted. This study examines the meaning of differentiation from the perspective of residents and explores the validity of the number of visitors and the possibility of reflecting residents' subjective score as evaluation indicators for a project. To achieve such an objective, this study uses survey data collected from 153 people in 38 comprehensive development projects in areas of Eup and Myeon, Korea. The results of this study show that differentiation is viewed as a by-product of positive improvement from a rural development project, from the perspective of residents. The effects of rural development are classified into two dimensions: socioeconomic effects and living environmental effects. Landscape improvement is included in the dimension of living environmental effects and an increase in the number of visitors is included in the dimension of socioeconomic effects. As such, they are confirmed to be the factors that determine the level of differentiation. For example, the increase in the number of visitors is confirmed to be a valid indicator of project success, in which two-dimensional characters are reflected. The level of differentiation evaluated by residents is a result of the workings of the above two factors. Unlike in previous studies, the possibility of evaluation based on the perception of residents is confirmed in the evaluation of results. When the level of differentiation is interpreted as the direct result of a project, the number of visitors has an impact on socioeconomic effects, and the project content of landscape improvement has an impact on living environmental effects. The goal of policy and residents is the same in terms of the effort residents may make in maximizing results of a project by themselves; thus, the government's goal is achieved even when a project is carried out under the autonomy of residents. Ultimately, the government should focus on providing conditions in which active citizen participation can not only occur but help to establish a policy direction, which subsequently strengthens the substantial rights of residents.
Abstract
In empirical studies on rural development projects, differentiation tends to be considered a strategy aimed at increasing the number of visitors. Rural development projects include the improvement of living environment, and the discussion about project goals and evaluation of project results are often focused on the aspect of rural tourism. Thus, subjective benefits of such projects for residents are omitted. This study examines the meaning of differentiation from the perspective of residents and explores the validity of the number of visitors and the possibility of reflecting residents' subjective score as evaluation indicators for a project. To achieve such an objective, this study uses survey data collected from 153 people in 38 comprehensive development projects in areas of Eup and Myeon, Korea. The results of this study show that differentiation is viewed as a by-product of positive improvement from a rural development project, from the perspective of residents. The effects of rural development are classified into two dimensions: socioeconomic effects and living environmental effects. Landscape improvement is included in the dimension of living environmental effects and an increase in the number of visitors is included in the dimension of socioeconomic effects. As such, they are confirmed to be the factors that determine the level of differentiation. For example, the increase in the number of visitors is confirmed to be a valid indicator of project success, in which two-dimensional characters are reflected. The level of differentiation evaluated by residents is a result of the workings of the above two factors. Unlike in previous studies, the possibility of evaluation based on the perception of residents is confirmed in the evaluation of results. When the level of differentiation is interpreted as the direct result of a project, the number of visitors has an impact on socioeconomic effects, and the project content of landscape improvement has an impact on living environmental effects. The goal of policy and residents is the same in terms of the effort residents may make in maximizing results of a project by themselves; thus, the government's goal is achieved even when a project is carried out under the autonomy of residents. Ultimately, the government should focus on providing conditions in which active citizen participation can not only occur but help to establish a policy direction, which subsequently strengthens the substantial rights of residents.
참고문헌 (41)
- 안수지, "디자인경영 관점의 강소농 육성 전략에 관한 연구", 디지털디자인학연구, 14(4), pp.947~957 (2014), 한국디지털디자인학회
- An S, "the Factors Analysis about Residential Satisfaction of Rural Village Comprehensive Development Project", the Proceeding in the Korean Association for Local Government Studies (2014)
- 채종훈, "전남지역 농촌마을종합개발사업의 경제적 성과 요인 분석", 한국지역개발학회지, 23(3), pp.107~126 (2011), 한국지역개발학회
- 최은영, "서울의 학력집단별 거주지 분리와 아파트 가격의 차별화", 한국지역지리학회지, 10(3), pp.592~605 (2004), 한국지역지리학회
- 조진상, "권역특화 농촌지역개발전략 수립 연구 - 장성군을 사례로", 한국지역개발학회지, 25(1), pp.79~102 (2013), 한국지역개발학회
- 최영완, "지역유형을 고려한 농촌마을종합개발사업의 주민평가 및 개선방안", 농업생명과학연구, 45(6), pp.227~235 (2011), 농업생명과학연구원
- 조영재, "지방정부의 농촌개발사업 추진체계의 문제점과 개선과제- 충청남도를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 16(1), pp.35~47 (2010), 한국농촌계획학회
- Cummins, R. A, "Objective and subjective quality of life : an interactive model", Social indicators Research, 52, pp.119~131 (2000)
- Heady, B, "Understanding happiness : a theory of subjective well-being" (1992), Longman Cheshire
- Jeong D, "Research about the Effect on the Action by Comparison of Social Reference Group", Korean Journal of Social Theory, 17(1), pp.94~111 (1983)
- Je J, "Local Festivals Differentiation Strategy of the Local Government", the Proceeding in the Korean Association for Local Government Studies (2006)
- Joo K, "Policy Direction of Rural Village Comprehensive Development Project", Rural and Environment, 14(1), pp.3~10 (2004)
- Kang J, "A Study of Reform for Rural Policy and Rural Development in Korea : A Case of New Rural Village Construction Drive", 박사, pp.2004
- KFN, "The Differentiation of Rural Village Development", Seminar in Newspaper Article by KFN in 2013 (2013)
- 김봉태, "어촌종합개발사업의 정량적 효과 분석", 해양정책연구, 26(2), pp.75~104 (2011), 한국해양수산개발원
- Kim C, "Policy Response Measure by Rural typology in Urban-Rural Exchange period", Land Policy Brief, pp.1~8 (2014)
- 김정태, "충청남도 5개 군의 GRDP 변화요인 분석", 농촌지도와 개발, 19(4), pp.1041~1066 (2012), 한국농촌지도학회
- 김정태, "농촌지역 산업별 고용변화요인 분석- 충남 5개 군을 대상으로 -", 농촌계획, 19(1), pp.123~135 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- Kim J, "Measurement of Community Welfare level Considering inter-regional Linkage and Traits", 박사, pp.2005
- 김제안, "농촌마을 종합개발사업이 주민만족도 및 개인소득증가에 미치는 영향 분석", 산업경제연구, 24(5), pp.2671~2691 (2011), 한국산업경제학회
- Kim Y, "Introduction to Sociology for New Generation" (2012), Humanist Publishing Group
- The Synthesis Report about Rural(Myeong) Village Comprehensive Development Project Master Plan, "KRC", KRC, ~ (2010)
- Effectiveness Analysis of The Rural Village Comprehensive Development Project, "KRC", KRC, ~ (2008)
- 이병기, "참여정부 농촌개발정책의 회고", 농촌지도와 개발, 15(1), pp.145~175 (2008), 한국농촌지도학회
- 이성우, "농업․농촌정책평가를 위한 정량적 분석모형 연구", 농촌계획, 14(4), pp.97~108 (2008), 한국농촌계획학회
- 이순배, "기초생활권 지역경제 활성화사업의 효과분석 -소득발생과 고용창출의 관점에서-", 재정정책논집, 13(1), pp.81~112 (2011), 한국재정정책학회
- Lee W, "Improvement Directions of Eup Development Project", Land Policy Brief, 62, pp.1~6 (2004)
- 이충훈, "지역 정체성을 위한 색채개선방안 연구 : 공주를 중심으로", 디자인학연구, 28(1), pp.233~251 (2015), 한국디자인학회[DOI]
- 이소영, "농촌지역개발사업의 장소 마케팅 전략 특성 분석 및 개선방안", 한국지역개발학회지, 21(3), pp.71~102 (2009), 한국지역개발학회
- Development a Competitive Strategy for Community Festivals in Gyeonggi-do, "Lee S", Gyeonggi Research Institute, ~ (2009)
- Lee S, "Differentiated Regional Development Strategy in Chungbuck", Chungbuck Issue & Trend, 8, pp.2~3 (2012)
- 이용학, "브랜드 지위를 고려한 차별화 전략 :속성 정렬성 및 속성 유형의 조절효과", 광고학연구, 24(7), pp.175~193 (2013), 한국광고학회[DOI]
- 이정훈, "지역개발에서 차별화된 장소이미지 설정을 위한 장소분석 방법론 재구축", 국토지리학회지, 38(4), pp.479~496 (2004), 국토지리학회
- MAFRA, "Rural Survives by Comprehensive Rural Village Development" (2010), Press release
- Development of Evaluation Index for Efficient Progress of Integrated Rural Village Development Project, "MAFRA", MAFRA, ~ (2006)
- 심규원, "농촌지역축제의 만족도가 지역경제활성화에 미치는 영향분석 - 아카시아 벌꿀 축제를 중심으로 -", 한국지역개발학회지, 21(4), pp.249~264 (2009), 한국지역개발학회
- 양원식, "농촌마을종합개발사업의 공동소득사업 성과분석", 농촌계획, 19(1), pp.55~70 (2013), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
- MAFRA, "The Enforcement Guidelines of MAFRA Projects in 2006", ~ (2006)
- MAFRA, "The Enforcement Guidelines of MAFRA Projects in 2009", ~ (2009)
- MAFRA, "The Enforcement Guidelines of MAFRA Projects in 2015", ~ (2015)
- "NIKL Standard Korean Dictionary"[URL]