본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

농촌지역 시설원예단지 경관선호도 분석 연구 - 한국, 네덜란드, 일본을 대상으로 -

A Study on the Landscape Preference Analysis of Facility Horticulture Complex in Rural Area- Focus on Korea, Netherlands, Japan -

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

Humans are provided with a wide range of public benefits from ecosystems and agricultural ecosystems. But the establishment of the horticulture complex is a space that hampers the public ecosystem. Therefore, we have evaluated the creating landscape function of the horticulture complex and found improvement. A total of 20 landscape slides were used for the study. Korea-paddy field, Korea-vinyl greenhouse, Korea-glass greenhouse, Japan-vinyl greenhouse and Netherlands-glass greenhouse were selected as 4 slides. The evaluation used the AHP method and 10 adjectives Likert which compares 20 landscape slides. Four Korea-paddy fields were rated highly positive images. All 10 adjectives can be selected as representative images of production scenes. In most adjectives, four scenes of KVG1, KVG2, KVG3 and KVG4, which are the Korea-greenhouse scenes, were evaluated as negative images. Netherlands and Korea-glass greenhouse scenes and Japan-vinyl greenhouse scenes were generally positive images. In conclusion, it is confirmed that glass greenhouse scenery is higher than vinyl greenhouse scenery. And Japan and Netherlands scenery are higher and better than Korea. Therefore, JVG1 in Japan and NGG3 in the Netherlands were proposed to be set as landscape improvement targets.

Abstract

Humans are provided with a wide range of public benefits from ecosystems and agricultural ecosystems. But the establishment of the horticulture complex is a space that hampers the public ecosystem. Therefore, we have evaluated the creating landscape function of the horticulture complex and found improvement. A total of 20 landscape slides were used for the study. Korea-paddy field, Korea-vinyl greenhouse, Korea-glass greenhouse, Japan-vinyl greenhouse and Netherlands-glass greenhouse were selected as 4 slides. The evaluation used the AHP method and 10 adjectives Likert which compares 20 landscape slides. Four Korea-paddy fields were rated highly positive images. All 10 adjectives can be selected as representative images of production scenes. In most adjectives, four scenes of KVG1, KVG2, KVG3 and KVG4, which are the Korea-greenhouse scenes, were evaluated as negative images. Netherlands and Korea-glass greenhouse scenes and Japan-vinyl greenhouse scenes were generally positive images. In conclusion, it is confirmed that glass greenhouse scenery is higher than vinyl greenhouse scenery. And Japan and Netherlands scenery are higher and better than Korea. Therefore, JVG1 in Japan and NGG3 in the Netherlands were proposed to be set as landscape improvement targets.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. 채혜성, "농업생산공간 경관의 효율적 관리를 위한 경관구성요소 분류에 관한 기초 연구", 농촌계획, 11(3) (2005), 한국농촌계획학회
  2. Dale, V.H, "Measures of the effects of agricultural practices onecosystem services", Ecol. Econ, 64, pp.286~296 (2007)
  3. "Factsheet on 2014-2020National Rural Development Programme for Spain" (2015)[URL]
  4. Garcia-Llorente, M, "The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes : an ecosystem service approach", Environ. Sci. Policy, 19-20, pp.136~146 (2012)
  5. 주신하, "국토계획 l 49경관형용사를 이용한 도시하천 경관특성 분석 - 청계천과 양재천을 중심으로 -", 국토계획, 47(4), pp.49~63 (2012), 대한국토·도시계획학회
  6. 강방훈, "올레길 7구간의 이용객 만족도 및 이미지 분석", 농촌계획, 18(3), pp.13~24 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  7. 김상범, "경관관련 제도변화에 따른 농촌경관계획의 발전방안 연구", 농촌계획, 18(4), pp.35~44 (2012), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  8. Kim, SK, "Landscape Evaluation of Rural Stream based on the Factor Analysis of Visual Preference", Journal of Korean Society of rural planning, 5(1), pp.5~44 (1999)
  9. Kim, CI, "Evaluation of the City Residents' Images on the Landscape Elements of the Rural Traditional Theme Village", Journal of The Korean Society of Industrial Application, 13(4), pp.227~233 (2010)
  10. 김상범, "농촌경관계획을 위한 공간별 주요경관요소에 관한 연구 -농촌전통테마마을을 중심으로-", 농촌계획, 12(3), pp.13~18 (2006), 한국농촌계획학회
  11. Kim, YM, "Resident-Participatory Landscape Adjectives for Evaluation about Rural Landscape Status Quo :Focused on Sangye-ri, Okcheon-gun, Chungbuk-do", Urban Design Institute of Korea, pp.45~653 (2009)
  12. 공민재, "농촌지역 시설원예단지의 경관 개선을 위한 이미지평가", 시설원예‧식물공장, 26(2), pp.78~86 (2017), (사) 한국생물환경조절학회
  13. Korea Environment Institute(KEI), "Environmental Impact Rural Land Use Pattern Changes", ~ (2004)
  14. Rural landscape indicators, rural landscape maps, and field applicability of the research landscape conservation the Convention, "Korea Rural Community Corporation(KRCC)", ~ (2007)
  15. Lee, BY, "A Study on the Evaluation Indices for the Visual Analysis of Rural landscape", Master, pp.2004
  16. 이동근, "농촌어메니티 자원에 기초한 농촌경관평가에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 13(1), pp.11~17 (2007), 한국농촌계획학회
  17. 2013 Greenhouse status and vegetable production performance, "Ministry of Agricultural Food and Rural Affairs", Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, ~ (2014)
  18. 2014 Vegetable greenhouse status and vegetable production performance, "Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs", Ministry of Agriculture Food and Rural Affairs, ~ (2014)
  19. Mu.noz, P, "International Conference on Sustainable Greenhouse Systems" (2008), GREENSYS
  20. Quintas-Soriano, C, "Impacts of land use change on ecosystem services and implications for human well-being in Spanish drylands", Land Use Policy, 54, pp.534~548 (2016)
  21. 나정화, "농촌 및 자연지역의 경관 다양성 평가모형 개발 및 적용", 한국조경학회지, 41(6), pp.84~95 (2013), 한국조경학회
  22. Richard T. T. Forman, "Land Mosaics : The ecology of landscapes and regions" (1995), Cambridge University Press
  23. A technical study on the rural planning and computerization, "Rural Research Institute(RRI)", ~ (1996)
  24. Shin, JH, "A Study on psychological preference characteristics of landscape lighting in buildings of cultural properties", Master, pp.2006
  25. 신민지, "조망거리에 따른 농촌경관의 농촌다움 평가에 관한 연구", 농촌계획, 21(2), pp.63~77 (2015), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  26. 손호기, "농촌체험 마을경관의 보전가치평가 연구", 농촌지도와 개발, 17(4), pp.897~918 (2010), 한국농촌지도학회
  27. 손진관, "시설원예단지의 생태계서비스 기능 증진을 위한 개선방안 연구", 농촌계획, 21(4), pp.45~53 (2015), 한국농촌계획학회[DOI]
  28. 손진관, "생육환경에 따른 보호수 이미지 평가 연구- 예산군 느티나무를 중심으로 -", 농촌계획, 17(2), pp.33~41 (2011), 한국농촌계획학회
  29. "Spain Law. 45", 2007. de 13 de Diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad, pp.51339~51349
  30. Suh, JH, "A Study on the Analysis of Landscape Preference in the Rural-Landscape by Indes of Shape", Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation, 6(3), pp.7~14 (2002)
  31. Yoo, NH, "Participatory Selecting Representative Landscape Adjectives Through Factor Analysis: Focused on Sangyeh-li, CheongSeong-Myun, Okcheon-Gun, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea", The Korean Geographic Society, pp.153~155 (2009)
  32. Yoo, SW, "A Study on the Visual Preference of Users according to the Location of Benches at Urban Community Parks", Archives of Design Research, 13(2), pp.95~102 (2000)
  33. Yoon, JO, "A Study on the Aesthetic Preference for Rural Landscapes: urban and rural resident differences", Journal of Korean institute of landscape architecture, 23(2), pp.93~103 (1995)
  34. Zalidis, G, "Impacts of agricultural practices on soil and water quality in the Mediterranean region and proposed assessment methodology", Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 88, pp.137~146 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)