The effects of different lighting conditions on the accuracy of intraoral scanning
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which intraoral scanning are affected by clinical conditions, and whether ambient lighting and different color temperatures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral scanner, as well as to evaluate scanning time. Materials and methods. Twelve different environments were created using various ambient lighting conditions (0, 500, 1000 and 1500 lux) and color temperatures (white, blue and yellow). A partially edentulous mandibular model with two implants and a three-unit bridge was scanned under each environment until 10 digital models were obtained, and scanning times were recorded using a virtual stopwatch. A 3D analysis was performed on the obtained digital models, and the data were analyzed using a software. The generalized linear model analysis and Tukey multiple comparison test were used to analyse the data (P < .05). Results. The effect of lux, color temperature, and scanning times on RMS data was found to be significant (P < .001). The mean RMS value was the highest in the 0 lux group and the lowest in the 500 lux group. Regarding the color temperature, the highest RMS value was in the white color group and the lowest in the yellow color group. Scanning times were similar among the 0, 500 and 1000 lux groups, with a significant increase in the 1500 lux group. Conclusion. Different ambient lighting conditions and color temperatures have significant effect on the accuracy of intraoral scanning.
Abstract
Purpose. This study aimed to investigate the extent to which intraoral scanning are affected by clinical conditions, and whether ambient lighting and different color temperatures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral scanner, as well as to evaluate scanning time. Materials and methods. Twelve different environments were created using various ambient lighting conditions (0, 500, 1000 and 1500 lux) and color temperatures (white, blue and yellow). A partially edentulous mandibular model with two implants and a three-unit bridge was scanned under each environment until 10 digital models were obtained, and scanning times were recorded using a virtual stopwatch. A 3D analysis was performed on the obtained digital models, and the data were analyzed using a software. The generalized linear model analysis and Tukey multiple comparison test were used to analyse the data (P < .05). Results. The effect of lux, color temperature, and scanning times on RMS data was found to be significant (P < .001). The mean RMS value was the highest in the 0 lux group and the lowest in the 500 lux group. Regarding the color temperature, the highest RMS value was in the white color group and the lowest in the yellow color group. Scanning times were similar among the 0, 500 and 1000 lux groups, with a significant increase in the 1500 lux group. Conclusion. Different ambient lighting conditions and color temperatures have significant effect on the accuracy of intraoral scanning.
참고문헌 (33)
- Abduo J, "Accuracy of intraoral scanners : a systematic review of influencing factors", Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent, 26, pp.101~121 (2018)
- Rutkūnas V, "Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review", Eur J Oral Implantol, 10(Suppl 1), pp.101~120 (2017)
- Michelinakis G, "A comparison of accuracy of 3 intraoral scanners : a single-blinded in vitro study", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.581~588 (2020)
- Christensen GJ, "Impressions are changing : deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling", J Am Dent Assoc, 140, pp.1301~1304 (2009)
- Akarslan ZZ, "Influence of gag reflex on dental attendance, dental anxiety, self-reported temporomandibular disorders and prosthetic restorations", J Oral Rehabil, 40, pp.932~939 (2013)
- Grünheid T, "Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner : an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance", Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 146, pp.673~682 (2014)
- Yuzbasioglu E, "Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques : evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes", BMC Oral Health, 14, pp.10~ (2014)
- Schepke U, "Digital versus analog complete-arch impressions for single-unit premolar implant crowns : Operating time and patient preference", J Prosthet Dent, 114, pp.403~406 (2015)
- Joda T, "Patient-centered outcomes comparing digital and conventional implant impression procedures : a randomized crossover trial", Clin Oral Implants Res, 27, pp.e185~e189 (2016)
- Gjelvold B, "Intraoral digital impression technique compared to conventional impression technique. a randomized clinical trial", J Prosthodont, 25, pp.282~287 (2016)
- Chandran DT, "Two-and three-dimensional accuracy of dental impression materials : effects of storage time and moisture contamination", Biomed Mater Eng, 20, pp.243~249 (2010)
- Ziegler M, "Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision", Int J Comput Dent, 12, pp.159~163 (2009)
- Ender A, "In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining fullarch dental impressions", Quintessence Int, 46, pp.9~17 (2015)
- Ender A, "Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions : a new method of measuring trueness and precision", J Prosthet Dent, 109, pp.121~128 (2013)
- Menini M, "Accuracy of multi-unit implant impression : traditional techniques versus a digital procedure", Clin Oral Investig, 22, pp.1253~1262 (2018)
- Kim J, "Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 116, pp.221~230 (2016)
- Lim JH, "Comparison of digital intraoral scanner reproducibility and image trueness considering repetitive experience", J Prosthet Dent, 119, pp.225~232 (2018)
- Richert R, "Intraoral scanner technologies : a review to make a successful impression", J Healthc Eng, 2017, pp.8427595~ (2017)
- Müller P, "Impact of digital intraoral scan strategies on the impression accuracy using the TRIOS pod scanner", Quintessence Int, 47, pp.343~349 (2016)
- Arakida T, "Evaluating the influence of ambient light on scanning trueness, precision, and time of intra oral scanner", J Prosthodont Res, 62, pp.324~329 (2018)
- Cuesta E, "Influence of roughness on surface scanning by means of a laser stripe system", Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 43, pp.1157~1166 (2009)
- Vukašinović N, "Correlation between incident angle, measurement distance, object colour and the number of acquired points at CNC laser scanning", J Mech Eng, 58, pp.23~28 (2012)
- Anh JW, "A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners : effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction", Korean J Orthod, 46, pp.3~12 (2016)
- Park JM, "Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners : sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form", J Adv Prosthodont, 8, pp.354~362 (2016)
- Patzelt SB, "Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws", J Am Dent Assoc, 144, pp.914~920 (2013)
- Revilla-León M, "Intraoral digital scans : part 2-influence of ambient scanning light conditions on the mesh quality of different intraoral scanners", J Prosthet Dent, 124, pp.575~580 (2020)
- Viohl J, "Dental operating lights and illumination of the dental surgery", Int Dent J, 29, pp.148~163 (1979)
- Koseoglu M, "Evaluating the effect of ambient and scanning lights on the trueness of the intraoral scanner", J Prosthodont, 30, pp.811~816 (2021)
- Revilla-León M, "Analysis of different illuminance of the room lighting condition on the accuracy(trueness and precision)of an intraoral scanner", J Prosthodont, 30, pp.157~162 (2021)
- Ochoa-López G, "Influence of ambient light conditions on the accuracy and scanning time of seven intraoral scanners in complete-arch implant scans", J Dent, 121, pp.104138~ (2022)
- Wesemann C, "Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans?", J Prosthet Dent, 125, pp.924~931 (2021)
- Ma Y, "Influence of ambient light conditions on intraoral scanning : a systematic review", J Prosthodont Res, 68, pp.237~245 (2024)
- Blanco D, "Influence of ambient light on the quality of laser digitized surfaces", International Conference of Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems. World Congress on Engineering, 1, pp.32~37 (2008), Conference proceedings