본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

19세기 공동납과 마을자치

Joint Tax Payment and Community Autonomy in 19th century

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타인문학

초록

In the late 19th century, Mosan-dong jointly paid most of the prefecture tax, which is a poll tax. When the village collected goods from the villagers in preparation for various expenses, their economic ability was carefully considered. Just as the government struggled to realize equal taxation, villages also tried to keep villagers from being dissatisfied. As a result, the village was able to collect various goods from villagers without much difficulties. And a high level of community autonomy was realized in the late 19th century. As the joint tax payment system was activated, the force pressing the village became much stronger than before. Before that, it only had to deal with Gunhyeon, middle level of administrative district, but now you have to deal with Myeonjung, small administrative district, in addition to that. Therefore, the joint tax payment system can be said to be a more sophisticated taxation system than the previous ‘individual tax payment’ system. Mosan-dong in the second half of the 19th century was always in tension due to unforeseen external pressures Not only regular taxes, but also lots of unknown miscellaneous charges were suddenly imposed. And various institutions, various officials, and influential people from far and near came from time to time to harass the village. Each time the village appeased them with money and sent them back. As such, when the village was being bullied from the outside, the government [the country] just stood by and did not come up with any solution. Like this, the village was exhausted from enduring external harassment and had no strength to take a look inside. The high level of autonomy realized by the village in the 19th century was only to prepare for external demands. The village did not discuss anything related to production. There was no discussion about when and how much villagers would be put into rice planting or weeding work in a house that lacks manpower. The village considered that such problems were issues that the home and villagers, who lacked manpower, would take care of themselves. The village didn't think deeply about how villagers could get wealthy. The village only cared about collecting enough goods to cover the necessary expenses. To be precise, the village had no power to encourage villagers to increase production. This was because no one from the central government, Gunhyeon, or Myeonjung gave such power to the village. Village autonomy in the 19th century was different from the autonomy of a medieval manor or a Mura in the Edo period. In the 19th century, villages in Joseon only cared about distribution, but manor and Mura discussed distribution and production together. The government also changed accounts so that the joint tax payment system can operate smoothly. The basic prefecture tax ledger related to joint tax payment was the family register. Various prefecture taxes were imposed based on the number of houses registered in the family register. Therefore, the government tried to make 'Ho(house)' registered in the family register homogeneous. It was recommended that all heads of family be called Yuhak, and a family register should be filled out with one slave in every house. In the joint tax payment system, as villagers were jointly responsible for payment, the government needed to make villagers homogeneous. The government continued its ideological campaign to ensure that the joint tax payment system can be operated smoothly. Hyangyak, which appeared and disappeared quickly in the 16th and 17th centuries, spread like an active volcano in the mid to late 19th century. The spread of Hyangyak was directly related to the activation of joint tax payment. The four virtues of Hyangyak are: Good things encourage each other(德業相勸), Rebuke each other for wrongdoing(過失相規), We must be polite when socializing with each other(禮俗相交), Help each other in disasters and difficulties(患難相恤), and it means dividing equally. This sounded like a saying that if a neighbor is struggling with the tax burden, you should help out. On the other hand, there was nothing related to increased production anywhere in the virtues of Hyangyak. Increasing production was a task that the people had to achieve on their own.

Abstract

In the late 19th century, Mosan-dong jointly paid most of the prefecture tax, which is a poll tax. When the village collected goods from the villagers in preparation for various expenses, their economic ability was carefully considered. Just as the government struggled to realize equal taxation, villages also tried to keep villagers from being dissatisfied. As a result, the village was able to collect various goods from villagers without much difficulties. And a high level of community autonomy was realized in the late 19th century. As the joint tax payment system was activated, the force pressing the village became much stronger than before. Before that, it only had to deal with Gunhyeon, middle level of administrative district, but now you have to deal with Myeonjung, small administrative district, in addition to that. Therefore, the joint tax payment system can be said to be a more sophisticated taxation system than the previous ‘individual tax payment’ system. Mosan-dong in the second half of the 19th century was always in tension due to unforeseen external pressures Not only regular taxes, but also lots of unknown miscellaneous charges were suddenly imposed. And various institutions, various officials, and influential people from far and near came from time to time to harass the village. Each time the village appeased them with money and sent them back. As such, when the village was being bullied from the outside, the government [the country] just stood by and did not come up with any solution. Like this, the village was exhausted from enduring external harassment and had no strength to take a look inside. The high level of autonomy realized by the village in the 19th century was only to prepare for external demands. The village did not discuss anything related to production. There was no discussion about when and how much villagers would be put into rice planting or weeding work in a house that lacks manpower. The village considered that such problems were issues that the home and villagers, who lacked manpower, would take care of themselves. The village didn't think deeply about how villagers could get wealthy. The village only cared about collecting enough goods to cover the necessary expenses. To be precise, the village had no power to encourage villagers to increase production. This was because no one from the central government, Gunhyeon, or Myeonjung gave such power to the village. Village autonomy in the 19th century was different from the autonomy of a medieval manor or a Mura in the Edo period. In the 19th century, villages in Joseon only cared about distribution, but manor and Mura discussed distribution and production together. The government also changed accounts so that the joint tax payment system can operate smoothly. The basic prefecture tax ledger related to joint tax payment was the family register. Various prefecture taxes were imposed based on the number of houses registered in the family register. Therefore, the government tried to make 'Ho(house)' registered in the family register homogeneous. It was recommended that all heads of family be called Yuhak, and a family register should be filled out with one slave in every house. In the joint tax payment system, as villagers were jointly responsible for payment, the government needed to make villagers homogeneous. The government continued its ideological campaign to ensure that the joint tax payment system can be operated smoothly. Hyangyak, which appeared and disappeared quickly in the 16th and 17th centuries, spread like an active volcano in the mid to late 19th century. The spread of Hyangyak was directly related to the activation of joint tax payment. The four virtues of Hyangyak are: Good things encourage each other(德業相勸), Rebuke each other for wrongdoing(過失相規), We must be polite when socializing with each other(禮俗相交), Help each other in disasters and difficulties(患難相恤), and it means dividing equally. This sounded like a saying that if a neighbor is struggling with the tax burden, you should help out. On the other hand, there was nothing related to increased production anywhere in the virtues of Hyangyak. Increasing production was a task that the people had to achieve on their own.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 이종범, "19세기 후반 호포법의 운영실태에 대한 검토", 동방학지, 77ㆍ78ㆍ79 (1993)
  2. 송양섭, "균역법 시행 이후 균역제 추이와 동포제의 운영", 군사, 31 (1995)
  3. 전민영, "18세기 말~19세기 海村의 共同納 운영 방식 -巨濟 舊助羅里 고문서를 중심으로-", 古文書硏究, 48, pp.133~164 (2016), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
  4. 전민영, "19세기 巨濟 舊助羅里의 생활 방식에 관한 연구-旅客主人·漁條를 둘러싼 문제를 중심으로-", 古文書硏究, 51, pp.237~262 (2017), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
  5. 송양섭, "19세기~20세기 초 巨濟 舊助羅里의 洞中과 洞錢의 운영", 한국문화, (94), pp.393~439 (2021), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  6. 송양섭, "18~19세기 동래부 동하면의 ‘면중(面中)'과 잡역운영", 역사와 현실, (112), pp.237~274 (2019), 한국역사연구회[DOI]
  7. 이용기, "19세기 후반~20세기 중반 동계와 마을자치 : 전남 장흥군 용산면 어서리 사례를 중심으로", 박사, 국사학, pp.2007
  8. 윤해동, "지배와 자치" (2006), 역사비평사
  9. 이용기, "19세기 동계의 마을자치조직으로전환에 관한 시론", 사학연구, (128), pp.309~358 (2017), 한국사학회
  10. 마르크 블로크, "서양의 장원제" (2002), 까치
  11. 마르크 블로크, "프랑스 농촌사의 기본성격" (2007), 나남
  12. 水本邦彦, "村" (2015), 岩波新書
  13. 하야미 아키라, "근세 일본의 경제발전과 근면혁명" (2006), 혜안
  14. 김건태, "조선후기 마을 사람들의 관계 맺기", 동아문화, 57 (2019)
  15. "洞中年下記", ~
  16. "洞契傳掌記", ~
  17. 김건태, "19세기 집약적 농법의 확산과 작물의 다각화―경상도 예천 맛질 박씨가 가작 사례", 역사비평, (101), pp.280~312 (2012), 역사문제연구소
  18. 豊田重一, "農社農樂に關する", 朝鮮彙報 (1917)
  19. 張基昌, "農社に就て", 朝鮮彙報 (1917)
  20. "亡結契傳掌記", ~
  21. "예천 맛질 朴氏家日記", ~
  22. 鈴木榮太郞, "朝鮮農村社會踏査記" (1944), 大阪屋號書店
  23. 이용기, "일제시기 면 단위 유력자의 구성과 지역정치 ―전남 長興郡 蓉山面 사례를 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (67), pp.37~85 (2009), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  24. "傍村里大同禊", ~ (1865)
  25. "古上面鄕約禊完定節目", ~
  26. "鄕約契錢分給殖利冊", ~ (1901)
  27. "全羅南道長興郡所在庄土龍洞宮所管圖書文績類", 奎 19301, ~
  28. 김건태, "조선 후기 호적대장 호구차정 원리 ― 언양현 가좌책을 중심으로", 대동문화연구, (110), pp.35~70 (2020), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
  29. "還財分排記", ~ (1858)
  30. "別備米分排記", ~ (1869)
  31. 정진영, "19~20세기전반 한 ‘몰락양반’가의 중소지주로의 성장과정 ― 경상도 단성현 김인섭가의 경우", 대동문화연구, (52), pp.347~399 (2005), 대동문화연구원
  32. 김건태, "19세기 어느 성리학자의 家作과 그 지향 - 金興洛家 사례", 한국문화, (55), pp.115~158 (2011), 규장각한국학연구원[DOI]
  33. 김건태, "대한제국의 양전" (2018), 경인문화사
  34. 단성호적대장 연구팀, "단성호적대장연구" (2003), 대동문화연구원
  35. 김종수, "조선후기 중앙군제연구" (2003), 혜안
  36. 배항섭, "19세기 조선의 군사제도 연구" (2002), 국학자료원
  37. "火砲契錢成冊", ~ (1886)
  38. "火砲錢捧上冊", ~ (1886)
  39. 韓國精神文化硏究院, "예천 맛질 朴氏家 日記", ~
  40. 김건태, "19세기 회계자료에 담긴 實像과 虛像 - 1818∼1945년 전라도 장흥군 용산면 상금리 수원백씨 門契 자료 -", 古文書硏究, 43, pp.203~231 (2013), 한국고문서학회[DOI]
  41. "목민심서 兵典, 簽丁", ~
  42. "각사등록 21, 全羅南北道各郡訴狀 6, 光武九年九月□日 <請願書>", ~
  43. 김건태, "조선후기 마을 위상과 전세량의 관계", 한국사론, 65 (2019)
  44. "南面補稧節目", ~
  45. "南面補民稧追節目", ~
  46. "長興府南面補民稧節目", ~ (1834)
  47. "長興府各人等査徵錢出給各面救弊節目", ~
  48. 이철성, "18세기 전세 비총제의 실시와 그 성격", 한국사연구, 81 (1993)
  49. "慶尙北道慶州郡量案", 규장각 소장(古大 4258.5-17a, 17b, 17c), ~
  50. "上下契補上記", ~ (1879)
  51. "備邊司謄錄 159책", ~
  52. "南面補民稧節目", ~
  53. "子美洞 『洞中大同禊冊』 「完文」", ~

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)