강벌주의 형사제재에 대한 비판적 고찰 - 성범죄 처벌과 재범방지정책을 중심으로 -
A Study on Punitivism of the Penalty and Security-Measure - Focus on the Punishment and Second Offense Prevention policy of Sex Offenders -
0
조회
0
다운로드
16
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In order to prevent any sexual assault from occurring again, such criminal restrictions as the probation system, the community service order, the probation office order, the personal information disclosure, the electronic monitoring system for the positioning of sex offenders, and the anti-sexual drug treatment are currently being applied. However, in order to make such restrictions become more effective in our society, it is necessary to ensure the internal stability of such restrictions first of all. Also, it is important to consider the potential disputes which could be caused by the problems related to such factors as legality, the violation of human rights, the application of dual punishments, the prohibition of excessive punishments and the retroactive prohibition. Furthermore, since the preventive custody for sex offenders in terms of medical treatment and protection can also be regarded as the measure for the deprivation of their freedom beyond the limitation given by the responsible criminal law, a pressure for justification is being given in terms of the constitutional aspect. In terms of the institution and the system, many people will definitely believe that it is possible to completely remove all the sexual assaults from our society. However, by closely looking at the process of combining all the institutions, they will become suspicious of the justification of the complicated criminal restrictions in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects based on the absence of clear fundamental solutions to prevent any sexual assault from occurring again. Therefore,it can be said that the problem is not about the addition of any other institution or system, but about the identification of the target for the application of such an institution or system. Since objectives do not justify means, it is important to carefully consider the proper criminal and social policies required for the application of suitable criminal restrictions to the criminals who might commit sexual assaults again through the aspect of a constitutional state within the constitutional limitation.
Abstract
In order to prevent any sexual assault from occurring again, such criminal restrictions as the probation system, the community service order, the probation office order, the personal information disclosure, the electronic monitoring system for the positioning of sex offenders, and the anti-sexual drug treatment are currently being applied. However, in order to make such restrictions become more effective in our society, it is necessary to ensure the internal stability of such restrictions first of all. Also, it is important to consider the potential disputes which could be caused by the problems related to such factors as legality, the violation of human rights, the application of dual punishments, the prohibition of excessive punishments and the retroactive prohibition. Furthermore, since the preventive custody for sex offenders in terms of medical treatment and protection can also be regarded as the measure for the deprivation of their freedom beyond the limitation given by the responsible criminal law, a pressure for justification is being given in terms of the constitutional aspect. In terms of the institution and the system, many people will definitely believe that it is possible to completely remove all the sexual assaults from our society. However, by closely looking at the process of combining all the institutions, they will become suspicious of the justification of the complicated criminal restrictions in terms of the quantitative and qualitative aspects based on the absence of clear fundamental solutions to prevent any sexual assault from occurring again. Therefore,it can be said that the problem is not about the addition of any other institution or system, but about the identification of the target for the application of such an institution or system. Since objectives do not justify means, it is important to carefully consider the proper criminal and social policies required for the application of suitable criminal restrictions to the criminals who might commit sexual assaults again through the aspect of a constitutional state within the constitutional limitation.
참고문헌 (26)
- 상습적 성폭력범죄자 거세법에 관한 연구, "강은영", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- 김성돈, "책임형법의 위기와 예방형법의 한계", 형사법연구, 22(3), pp.3~31 (2010), 한국형사법학회
- 김일수, "보호감호처분의 재도입 및 보안처분제도의 형법 편입", 고려법학, (58), pp.355~394 (2010), 법학연구원
- 김종구, "최근 성범죄 관련 법률의 입법 과정의 문제점", 법학논총, 34(2), pp.429~455 (2010), 법학연구소
- 김호기, "전통적 책임주의에 대한 현대적 도전 - 특정 성범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착제도 도입이 가지는 의미 -", 형사법연구, 21(1), pp.199~222 (2009), 한국형사법학회
- 김혜정, "형사정책적 관점에서 성폭력범죄자의 유형에 따른 형사제재의 재조명", 법조, 59(7), pp.40~75 (2010), 법조협회
- 박상기, "소위 化學的 去勢와 '성폭력범죄자의 성충동 약물치료에 관한 법률'의 문제점", 형사정책연구, 21(3), pp.205~221 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- "범죄백서" (2010), 법무연수원
- 선종수, "성폭력범죄자의 성충동 약물치료에 관한 법률에 대한 비판적 검토", 법학논총, 23(2), pp.59~91 (2011), 법학연구소
- 설민수, "아동 대상 성폭력범죄자에 대한 성충동약물치료의 실효성과 합헌성, 그리고 그 한계", 법조, 59(10), pp.5~66 (2010), 법조협회
- 송문호, "형법개정과 상습누범: 위험한 성범죄인에 대한 보호감호제도의 재도입에 관한 논의", 형사정책연구, 21(1), pp.5~32 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 신양균, "보호감호 재도입 논의에 관한 비판적 검토", 영남법학, (31), pp.423~445 (2010), 법학연구소
- 형사특별법 정비방안(6): 성폭력범죄의처벌및피해자보호등에관한법률, "오영근", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2008)
- 윤영철, "우리나라 전자감시제도에 대한 비판적 소고: 특정 성폭력범죄자에 대한 위치추적 전자장치 부착에 관한 법률을 중심으로", 형사정책연구, 19(3), pp.201~228 (2008), 한국형사정책연구원
- 이경재, "1990년대 이후 형사정책 관련 법률의 특징과 이에 대한 평가", 법학연구, 30, pp.189~218 (2010), 부설법학연구소
- 이정념, "대상자를 위한 친사회적인 보호감호의 도입 필요성 및 그 방향", 형사정책, 22(1), pp.319~344 (2010), 한국형사정책학회
- 한국의 범죄현상과 형사정책(2010), "전영실", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (2010)
- Freiberg, Arie, "Penal Populism, Sentencing Councils and Sentencing Policy" (2008), Hawkins Press
- Friedrich Dencker, "Gefährlichkeitsvermutung statt Tatschuld-Tendenzen der neueren Strafrechtsentwicklung", StV, 6 (1988)
- Günther Jakobs, "Das Selbstverständnis der Strafrechtswissenschaft vor den Herausforderungen der Gegenwart (Kommentar), in Das Deutsche Strafrechtswissenschaft vor der Jahrtausendwende–Rückbesinnung und Ausblick" (2000)
- HansLilie, "Risikogesellschaft und Strafrecht", 비교형사법연구, 5(2-1), pp.3~90 (2003), 한국비교형사법학회
- John Pratt, "Penal Populism" (2007), Taylor & Francis
- Kurt Seelmann, "Risikostrafrecht", ~ (1992)
- Mary Bosworth, "Explaining US imprisonment" (2010), SAGE
- Schram D, "Community notification: a study of offender characteristics and recidivism" (1995), Washington State Institute for Public Policy
- W. Hassemer, "Symbolisches Strafrecht und Rechtsgüterschutz" (1989), NStZ