최근 우리나라의 중벌주의 입법경향에 대한 비판
Critics on the Legislative Trend of Severe Punishment in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
29
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In recent years brutal crimes such as serial killings, sexual violences occurred in succession and became serious problem in Korea. Mass media channels reported the chain of cases and many people began to think that present legal system is not sufficient to control the problem, punishing offenders with lenient sentences. In the face of a series of highly publicized incidents, korean government has kept enhancing its countermeasures to reduce heinous crimes through many special acts. Those include registration and disclosing of personal information of sex offenders, surveillance through electronic system(electronic ankle bracelet), and chemical castration. And korean government is taking steps to reintroduce protective custody, extended detention of convicted criminals, which was abolished because of violation of the Constitution in 2005, which bans punishing people twice for the same crime. Because most of the measures were concocted by the government hastily, probably at the behest of pubic opinion, controversial debate on those measures is crucial topic among policy makers and scholars. Korean government insist that those are necessarily conditions to reduce and manage the risk of repetition of crimes. But some people criticise that those measures are double jeopardy and excess charges, and are not effective to reduce repetition of those crimes. And they insist that psychological therapy and counseling can be more effective and rational than those tough actions. This paper will have a careful look the reasoning that are the grounds of introducing those countermeasures against brutal crimes. And this paper will also evaluate its efficiency based on many studies and data, and check its rightfulness from a standpoint of constitutionalism. Finally this paper will propose some directions to reform them.
Abstract
In recent years brutal crimes such as serial killings, sexual violences occurred in succession and became serious problem in Korea. Mass media channels reported the chain of cases and many people began to think that present legal system is not sufficient to control the problem, punishing offenders with lenient sentences. In the face of a series of highly publicized incidents, korean government has kept enhancing its countermeasures to reduce heinous crimes through many special acts. Those include registration and disclosing of personal information of sex offenders, surveillance through electronic system(electronic ankle bracelet), and chemical castration. And korean government is taking steps to reintroduce protective custody, extended detention of convicted criminals, which was abolished because of violation of the Constitution in 2005, which bans punishing people twice for the same crime. Because most of the measures were concocted by the government hastily, probably at the behest of pubic opinion, controversial debate on those measures is crucial topic among policy makers and scholars. Korean government insist that those are necessarily conditions to reduce and manage the risk of repetition of crimes. But some people criticise that those measures are double jeopardy and excess charges, and are not effective to reduce repetition of those crimes. And they insist that psychological therapy and counseling can be more effective and rational than those tough actions. This paper will have a careful look the reasoning that are the grounds of introducing those countermeasures against brutal crimes. And this paper will also evaluate its efficiency based on many studies and data, and check its rightfulness from a standpoint of constitutionalism. Finally this paper will propose some directions to reform them.
참고문헌 (48)
- 강은영, "상습적 성폭력범죄자 거세법에 관한 연구" (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 강호성, "전자발찌 도입 2년의 성과와 확대발전 방향", 보호관찰, 10(2), pp.39~135 (2010), 한국보호관찰학회
- 경찰청, "2011 경찰백서" (2011)
- 권수진, "2010년 형법개정동향, 중형주의로의 전환", 형사정책 주요동향, (여름) (2010)
- 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2011)
- 국가인권위원회, "정부제출 형법일부개정법률안에 대한 의견표명 결정문", ~ (2011)
- 김봉수, "전자감시장치 부착의 법적 성격과 확대적용에 대한 비판적 고찰", 법학논고, (36), pp.55~78 (2011), 법학연구원
- 김성돈, "형벌제도의 정비", 형법총칙개정공청회 자료집 (2010), 법무부
- 김일수, "보호감호처분의 재도입 및 보안처분제도의 형법 편입", 고려법학, (58), pp.355~394 (2010), 법학연구원
- 2010 연간보고서, "대법원 양형위원회", ~ (2011)
- 박미숙, "형벌제도의 발전과 중형주의", 형사정책연구소식, (56) (1999)
- 박상기, "형사특별법론" (2009), 한국형사정책연구원
- 배종대, "‘특별’형법을 ‘보통’형법으로 만들기", 형사정책, 18(1), pp.9~20 (2006), 한국형사정책학회
- 법무부, "형법개정법률안 제안이유서", ~ (1992)
- 법무연수원, "2010 범죄백서 및 2011 범죄백서" (2011)
- 법무부, "형법(총칙) 일부개정법률안 제안이유서", ~ (2011)
- 사회보호법폐지를 위한 공동대책위원회, "사회보호법 무엇이 문제인가? 토론회 자료집" (2004)
- 송문호, "형법개정과 상습누범: 위험한 성범죄인에 대한 보호감호제도의 재도입에 관한 논의", 형사정책연구, 21(1), pp.5~32 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 송영지, "신상정보 공개·고지명령 제도의 소급효", 형사정책연구, 22(4), pp.1~26 (2011), 한국형사정책연구원[DOI]
- 신양균, "보호감호 재도입 논의에 관한 비판적 검토", 영남법학, (31), pp.423~445 (2010), 법학연구소
- 안경옥, "청소년 성매매를 둘러싼 논의들에 대한 검토", 형사정책연구, 13(1), pp.1~33 (2002), 한국형사정책연구원
- 양정혜, "뉴스 미디어가 재현하는 범죄현실 : 아동대상 성폭력 범죄의 프레이밍", 언론과학연구, 10(2), pp.343~379 (2010), 한국지역언론학회
- 엄상섭, "우리 형법전에 나타난 형법민주화의 조항", 法政, 10(11) (1955)
- 엄상섭, "형법요강해설, 형법제․개정자료집" (1999), 한국형사정책연구원
- 2010년 성폭력실태조사(제1부), "여성가족부", ~ (2010)
- 윤정숙, "성범죄자 재범방지를 위한 치료프로그램개발연구" (2011), 한국형사정책연구원
- 음선필, "국회 입법과정의 분석과 개선방안 - 제18대 국회를 중심으로 -", 홍익법학, 13(2), pp.131~175 (2012), 법학연구소[DOI]
- 이경재, "청소년보호법의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책, 13(2) (2001)
- 이세정, "2008 국민법의식 조사연구" (2008), 한국법제연구원
- 이승호, "우리나라 보안처분의 역사적 전개", 형사정책, (7) (1995)
- 이재석, "형법의 重罰化 입법경향에 관한 비판적 고찰", 법학연구, (44), pp.199~224 (2011), 한국법학회
- 이호중, "보호감호(보호수용) 재도입에 대한 비판, In 형법개정안과 인권", 서울대학교 법학연구소 공익인권법센터
- 임상규, "성범죄자 신상공개의 필요성과 허구성", 형사법연구, (19), pp.372~392 (2003), 한국형사법학회
- 임웅, "법감정에 관한 연구", 법철학연구, 1 (1988)
- 이현지, "아동·청소년 성범죄의 물리적 도시환경 영향요인 분석", 대한건축학회논문집 계획계, 28(01), pp.217~226 (2012), 대한건축학회
- 정신교, "위치추적 전자감시의 소급효", 법학연구, 19(2), pp.387~409 (2011), 법학연구소
- 정웅일, "형법개정안의 보호수용제도에 대한 검토", 성균관법학, 23(2), pp.185~210 (2011), 법학연구소
- 체사레 벡카리아, "범죄와 형벌" (2006)
- 최석림, "성폭력범죄의 처벌 등에 관한 특례법 제정의 의의 및 과제", 의정연구, 16(2), pp.157~165 (2010), 한국의회발전연구회
- 최인섭, "범죄의 두려움에 관한 연구" (1997), 한국형사정책연구원
- 강력범죄에 대한 선고형량이 재범방지에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구, "최인섭", 한국형사정책연구원, ~ (1993)
- 탁희성, "2011년도 형법.형사소송법 및 형사특별법-제개정안 분석과 입법정책 개선방안" (2011), 한국형사정책연구원
- 한국성폭력상담소, "성폭력 뒤집기" (2011), 이매진
- 한인섭, "특별형법의 기본적 문제점", 인권과 정의, (170) (1990)
- 한인섭, "유기징역형의 상한, In 형법개정안과 인권" (2010), 서울대학교 법학연구소 공익인권법센터
- 황지태, "범죄피해율과 공식범죄발생률간의 비교분석: 2008년도 주요범죄 암수추정", 형사정책연구, 21(3), pp.7~51 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 生田勝義, "嚴罰主義と人間の安全, In 民主主義法學·刑事法學の展望(下)" (2005)
- J.J. Prescott, "Do Sex Offender Registration and Notification Laws Affect Criminal Behavior?", The Journal of Law & Economics, 54(1) (2011)