영어 수동구문의 제약기반적 분석과 by-구의 결속
A Constraint-Based Analysis of Passive Constructions and Binding of by-Phrase
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The main purpose of this paper is to recast passive constructions with a constraint-based analysis in which passive constructions are separated from active constructions. In general, a constraint-based analysis within the framework of HPSG explains syntactic and semantic phenomena such as passive constructions with types, constraints, and multiple inheritance hierarchy. To explain passive constructions as a separate phenomenon from active constructions, the type of English passives is regarded as the subtype of ergative, and according to Grimshaw (1990) and Wechsler (1995), PP[by] phrase in English passive constructions is considered as an adjunct, not as an optional complement. But there is still a problem that cannot be explained by the established binding theory, when PP[by] phrase is treated as an adjunct. It is necessary to adopt ‘Adverb Addition Schema' of Sag (2005) and ‘Amalgamation of Argument Structures' of Park Hyo-Myong (2006) to solve this problem within the framework of a constraint-based analysis.
Abstract
The main purpose of this paper is to recast passive constructions with a constraint-based analysis in which passive constructions are separated from active constructions. In general, a constraint-based analysis within the framework of HPSG explains syntactic and semantic phenomena such as passive constructions with types, constraints, and multiple inheritance hierarchy. To explain passive constructions as a separate phenomenon from active constructions, the type of English passives is regarded as the subtype of ergative, and according to Grimshaw (1990) and Wechsler (1995), PP[by] phrase in English passive constructions is considered as an adjunct, not as an optional complement. But there is still a problem that cannot be explained by the established binding theory, when PP[by] phrase is treated as an adjunct. It is necessary to adopt ‘Adverb Addition Schema' of Sag (2005) and ‘Amalgamation of Argument Structures' of Park Hyo-Myong (2006) to solve this problem within the framework of a constraint-based analysis.
참고문헌 (19)
- 박효명, "핵어문법론" (2004), 전남대학교 출판부
- 박효명, "논항구조의 합과 결속", 언어학, 14, pp.243~272 (2006)
- 장동술, "수동구문의 제약기반적 분석", 박사, pp.2007
- Bouma, G., "Satisfying Constraints on Extraction and Adjunction", Language and Linguistic Theory, 19(1), pp.1~65 (2001)
- Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht" (1981), Foris Publications.
- Chomsky, N, "Barriers. Cambridge, Mass" (1986), MIT Press
- Grimshaw,J, "Argument Structure" (1990), MIT Press
- Kathol, Andreas, "Passives without Lexical Rules", CSLI lecture notes series, 46, pp.237-~272 (1994)
- Lakoff, G, "Irregularity in Syntax" (1970), Rinehart and Winston
- Levine, R. D, "Adjuncts, Valents: Cumulative Scoping Adverbial Constructions and Impossible Descriptions", proceedings of the 9th International Conference on HPSG, pp.209~232 (2003), CSLI Publications
- Manning,C., "Argument Structure, Valence, and Binding", Journal of Linguistics, 21, pp.107~144 (1998)
- Pollard, C, "Information-Based Syntactic and Semantics. Vol.1: Fundamentals" (1987), Stanford Univ
- Pollard, C, "Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. CSLI" (1994), The University of Chicago Press
- Safir,K, "The Syntactic Projection of Lexical Thematic Structure", Language and Linguistic Theory, 5, pp.561~601 (1987)
- Sag,I, "English Relative Clause Constructions", Journal of Linguistics, 33, pp.431~484 (1997)
- Sag,I, "Adverb Extraction and Coordination: a Reply to Levine", Proceedings of HPSG05 Conference, pp.335~336 (2005), CSLI Publications
- Sag, I, "Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction" (1999), CSLI Publications
- Sag, I, "Syntactic Theory: A Formal Introduction" (2003), CSLI Publications
- Wechsler, S, "Semantic Basis of Argument Structure" (1995), CSLI Publications